Ambiguity over Ambiguity

Not long ago there was a story about a little boy who had two lesbian parents. The parents decided to put him on hormone therapy and dress him femininely. A lot of people were really angry about this including many in the homosexual community and many lesbians were outraged. It gives the appearance of choosing the child's sex against nature and heavy handedness in pushing him to choose other than his natural sex.

Recently, it has been discovered that some doctors were giving pills to women that would decrease the likelihood that their children would be born lesbian or with ambiguous genitalia. In other words, parents deciding that they would use hormones to promote their child's sex to be different than it would be naturally. A pill to change a little boys sex is wrong and a pill to change a little girls sex is wrong. I am pretty sure that two wrongs do not make a right; but, lets discuss this a little deeper.

Is it right to change your child's natural sex? If you are the most gay hating idiot in the world, would you have your spouse take a pill that would change the gender of your baby? That would be unnatural. I have a problem with sex change and I have a big problem with them being performed on minors or prenatally. I have a problem with transhumanism; but, I am consistent on it.

Maybe some that will read this do not have a problem with giving their unborn child steroids to make sure that they are born straight; but, where does it end? I do not have one doubt in my mind that if they could have given my mother a pill that would have prevented me from being autistic, they would have and I don't think she would have taken it knowing that. Many women would have taken the pill and you would not have the Pimpernel that you know and love, I would have been "normal". You would not have my writings and I would not have had the achievements that I did. I would not have liked that, I like being me.

The transhumanist agenda is basically you selling your soul to be like everyone else, less than you. To take these pills in exchange for some increased ability and give up a piece of being you. So what other "defects" would you eliminate, blindness, deafness, bi-polar, committed, dogmatic, religious? So many to choose from based upon whatever.

I fear I am going to easy on my readers and they will feel that I am just not trying, so lets try this. Lets say you knew your baby would be born with an 80 IQ, would you take hormones or gene therapy so that the child would be born with an IQ of 130? What if you could take these therapies to change a midget into a six foot adult?

In England there was a guy who fathered hundreds of children through a sperm bank. The women and men liked his picture and intelligence. He was very popular. The point is people would quite often pick the same traits and our biodiversity will be eliminated. For the non-religious, it is anti-Darwinism, it is not natural selection, it is unnatural selection. God and Darwin agreed that selection should be natural.

HuffPost - The Sad Lengths Some Go to Avoid Having a Lesbian Daughter

Fox News - Controversial Therapy for Pre-Teen Transgender Patient Raises Questions

I think I should mention something else. The lesbian couple say that the child claimed to be female at a age three and they tried to convince him he was a boy. The pills he is being given will not change what he becomes, it delays puberty so that he will have more time to understand what he is asking. Most gay men have absolutely no interest in becoming women and most lesbians have absolutely no interest in becoming men. His parents are trying to buy him time and not feel the pressure of all the hormones during puberty. The parents who would choose to take hormones to prevent their child from becoming gay before it was even born, the child would have no say in the matter. A morality question.