How do you know a scientist is trying to lie to you, he writes and article. LMAO. It is now being said that we are about to have a mass extinction of species. We will begin by pointing out that this is garbage, their ability to predict mass extinction. That is a complete lie.
Scientists have concluded that there is no way to tell which species will survive regardless of how diverse the number of species are. That is the big lie. Survival is not based on the number of species; but, is instead based on the diversity WITHIN each given species. We have discussed this before, it is called outliers, freaks like me.
I have five times what is considered highly dangerous of triglycerides, I have 50% more red blood cells than is considered normal. Combine it and you get 180/150 blood pressure. My blood is thicker than oil, rofl. I am an outlier. I would survive if the oxygen level in the atmosphere dropped, most would not. Triglycerides are brain food, I would still function, most would not. I am not saying that such a thing will happen, I am discussing freaks and their necessity.
The species that survive the greatest changes have the greatest diversity. That is the answer and always has been. How much diversity can you live with and how much is moral? Remember the idiot that wanted to kill people at the Discovery Channel building, he didn't get it. We are nature too. He wanted to kill a species to save the others, that is to play God, he does not know which is meant to survive by nature. He argued for nature and was unwilling to live by it's rules. Nature is a process, not a place, it takes care of itself, including dealing with the likes of us.
I respect plants and animals including us. Nature will determine the future of us all, we should not attempt to play God and decide for it. How can a scientist disagree with that? How can they attempt to deny that we are part of nature? They would let cows evolve into intelligent beings but not us evolve. Why are they so afraid of us evolving? Because in the next phase we understand. Perhaps, if my audience is nice, I will explain this someday. We do not discover that we are all God, I am not and you are not. We did not create the universe.
Didn't know I would post again tonight. Was thinking of more pleasant things. Oh well, it happens that way sometimes. We let our minds wander and come upon things, I just have to write about them, it is my nature.
Thursday, September 2, 2010
Burquas and Mickey Mouse
Okay, a Disneyland employee who is Muslim wanted to wear a Muslim head scarf. I know that I said before that I was outraged that European countries wanted to outlaw certain clothes that Muslim women wear. If you expect me to take the same position on Disneyland you would be wrong.
I want to remind you that the media is leading to the answers that it wants and this why the reporting is timed the way it is. If you go to work for Disneyland you are told that you are all actors playing a role. If you don't want to wear the costume, don't take the job. Disneyland has costumes, not a dress code, costumes.
If I choose to join a company that has a requirement for my position, I choose to follow the dress code TO A DEGREE. Some jobs require the wearing of uniforms, this can be for many valid reasons. I want to know that the man who is coming to my house works for the gas company before he goes in my backyard. If I go to McDonalds or another place that makes food I want to know that the food is clean and healthy. Uniforms show when they are stained for a reason.
Uniforms should not be required at school because we are FORCED to go there up till a certain age. Private schools are different, it is voluntary (your parents have choice). Most jobs that indoors don't really need you to have a certain look unless you deal with the public.
I am an executive and rarely wear a tie. I don't often meet with the public. I wear a suit and keep ties in my office in case I have to go before elected officials or meet with the public. Clothes can serve many purposes. Sometimes they tell a story.
I know a very wealthy man with whom I do business. When I meet with him it is usually at a restaurant or his office. When I do meet with him I have to drive quite a distance and don't usually go to the office. On those days I wear a Hawaiian shirt, khakis and tennis shoes. He also dresses casually. Our dress signifies that we are being casual and open with one another.
On one occasion he had failed to meet a personal promise, it was a handshake deal that was to be formalized between our organizations at a later date. It did not matter, he broke his word. We had an agreement, not a contract. The agreement was between him and I, the contract was to be between our organizations. He had three choices and I said I would support any of them, no pressure. He picked. Because he picked I began adjusting my organizations position. When he changed his mind he had wasted my time, broke a trust and failed to remember that my word is my bond.
For a series of reasons he concluded that the original agreement was best for all. I believed the original agreement was best for all; but, I had a dilemma, I could not trust his word as much. He asked to meet and for me to consider going back to the original agreement. I told my assistant that I was going to wear a suit on that day and that it would be the first thing that the man would ask about. I explained to my assistant the reason behind my clothing and how it can help to say things without forcing people into taking a position.
My assistant, who reads this, thought I was wrong and was making too much up of something simple. We arrived at the man's office and the first words out of his mouth was to ask about my wearing the suit. Real business deals are made between two people in a casual setting, golf course, tennis court, restaurant, whatever. They are made in a casual setting because it lets the negotiations be casual and not place people in positions that cause animosity or all or nothing thinking.
I cannot go golfing with businessmen, I work for the government. Because of this I have to convey a sense of casualness in other ways, I do it with my clothing. I have given away a secret, oh my. Even though I work for the government, private industry has always appreciated my directness and willingness to stick by my word and be fair. I have been offered many jobs in private industry because of this. Everyone knows I will do what is best for my organization, my home, my City. I have never taken the jobs.
I have a call center under me. I don't care what they wear as long as it is not provocative. They sit in little cubicles answering calls all day, they are not seen by the public. We are looking at when dress codes are appropriate, how about when they have a reasonable purpose? What a thought. How bout not when I am forced to be in a situation? I am not forced to be in jail, that requires some action on my part.
The young boy, that I used to call my son-in-law until he corrected me, has tattoos and piercings. He worked at a bank. He wore clothes that allowed him to hide most, if not all, of his tattoos and removed his piercings during his working hours. I do not like tattoos or piercings; but, believe in his right to have them. I would not hire an assistant who had them.
I was Navy ROTC and Coast Guard certified by 13. I love Polynesia, it has always been special in my heart. I especially have had a love affair with Tahiti. I fell in love with the paintings of Gauguin. I studied Polynesia, my professor wanted me to become "the expert"; but, it was from love not a career. When I had traveled half the world I got a earring in my right ear. It was in recognition of having traveled half the world, no longer a polliwog.
The man I spoke about earlier who is very rich, he is old school and has over a thousand people who owe their jobs to him. He is accustomed to saying what he thinks and discussing with his employees their dress code. I do not work for him. I am very traditional in many ways, personal ways. When I came back from Hawaii, where I got my piercing the old fashioned way, the people who knew me were shocked. It was just a small gold ball; but, they figured I was trying to be younger because they did not understand my background.
Well, I met with the man who I spoke of and while we were talking he just kept turning to look at my left ear (right ear piercings have traditionally meant homosexual, left ear piercings were navy). I eventually removed my earring for religious beliefs. If not for my religious beliefs I would get old school Polynesian tattoos on my legs, that will surprise many people who know me. I would have it done the traditional way in Tahiti, it would take a month and hurt more than you can imagine. You might want to look it up.
You cannot have certain jobs in the military or intelligence if you have tattoos because they identify you. When the police arrest you, they photograph any tattoos for a reason. They also photograph scars. I do not have many scars, I heal very well. I have one and only one that will not go away. It is in the middle of my forehead where your "third eye" should be, where East Indians put the dot, I have had it since I was about four. I split my head open after being pushed down a hill into a brick column, square brick column and hit the corner. It looks like a tiny dimple at 50, it used to look like a five sided star.
We were talking about why I wouldn't hire an assistant who had tattoos or piercings. That is easy, because it gives away what you are thinking. When I meet someone in a business setting, we need time to trust each other, to develop our relationship. In Poker, we look for "tells", little movements that say what you have in your hand. Same thing in negotiations. I have many people that work for me; but, I only ever have one "assistant". It is the person who is allowed to go to negotiations with me. There are rules. Rule one is don't talk until we know we are on the same page. Tattoos are talking. When I wear a Hawaiian shirt to a negotiation, I am talking, when I wear a suit, I am talking.
I began by talking about Disneyland and ended up discussing my assistant, it all goes together. It is okay to have religious beliefs, it is okay to wear all kinds of clothes, it is okay to get tattoos if it is not against your beliefs; but, for all these choices come consequences. Sometimes they are appropriate, other times they are not. We should look beyond the obvious to the reasons. Are the reasons compelling or merely convenience? That is important. Be well, I hope you enjoyed this little post. First time I have felt it flow in a bit. Thanks for the opportunity to be heard.
Sorry, quick UPDATE. I have to thank my ex-wife for something. She was the one who taught me about clothes. She told me that men get angry and get in a fight, women, she said, figure out what they are going to wear and how to set the scene. She was naked and had just come out of the shower when she said she wanted a divorce. She never looked at me, she looked in the mirror, it was as I was leaving for work. Can you figure out what she was attempting to say, she was the one that taught me. She said it right after I kissed the back of her neck to head to work.
I want to remind you that the media is leading to the answers that it wants and this why the reporting is timed the way it is. If you go to work for Disneyland you are told that you are all actors playing a role. If you don't want to wear the costume, don't take the job. Disneyland has costumes, not a dress code, costumes.
If I choose to join a company that has a requirement for my position, I choose to follow the dress code TO A DEGREE. Some jobs require the wearing of uniforms, this can be for many valid reasons. I want to know that the man who is coming to my house works for the gas company before he goes in my backyard. If I go to McDonalds or another place that makes food I want to know that the food is clean and healthy. Uniforms show when they are stained for a reason.
Uniforms should not be required at school because we are FORCED to go there up till a certain age. Private schools are different, it is voluntary (your parents have choice). Most jobs that indoors don't really need you to have a certain look unless you deal with the public.
I am an executive and rarely wear a tie. I don't often meet with the public. I wear a suit and keep ties in my office in case I have to go before elected officials or meet with the public. Clothes can serve many purposes. Sometimes they tell a story.
I know a very wealthy man with whom I do business. When I meet with him it is usually at a restaurant or his office. When I do meet with him I have to drive quite a distance and don't usually go to the office. On those days I wear a Hawaiian shirt, khakis and tennis shoes. He also dresses casually. Our dress signifies that we are being casual and open with one another.
On one occasion he had failed to meet a personal promise, it was a handshake deal that was to be formalized between our organizations at a later date. It did not matter, he broke his word. We had an agreement, not a contract. The agreement was between him and I, the contract was to be between our organizations. He had three choices and I said I would support any of them, no pressure. He picked. Because he picked I began adjusting my organizations position. When he changed his mind he had wasted my time, broke a trust and failed to remember that my word is my bond.
For a series of reasons he concluded that the original agreement was best for all. I believed the original agreement was best for all; but, I had a dilemma, I could not trust his word as much. He asked to meet and for me to consider going back to the original agreement. I told my assistant that I was going to wear a suit on that day and that it would be the first thing that the man would ask about. I explained to my assistant the reason behind my clothing and how it can help to say things without forcing people into taking a position.
My assistant, who reads this, thought I was wrong and was making too much up of something simple. We arrived at the man's office and the first words out of his mouth was to ask about my wearing the suit. Real business deals are made between two people in a casual setting, golf course, tennis court, restaurant, whatever. They are made in a casual setting because it lets the negotiations be casual and not place people in positions that cause animosity or all or nothing thinking.
I cannot go golfing with businessmen, I work for the government. Because of this I have to convey a sense of casualness in other ways, I do it with my clothing. I have given away a secret, oh my. Even though I work for the government, private industry has always appreciated my directness and willingness to stick by my word and be fair. I have been offered many jobs in private industry because of this. Everyone knows I will do what is best for my organization, my home, my City. I have never taken the jobs.
I have a call center under me. I don't care what they wear as long as it is not provocative. They sit in little cubicles answering calls all day, they are not seen by the public. We are looking at when dress codes are appropriate, how about when they have a reasonable purpose? What a thought. How bout not when I am forced to be in a situation? I am not forced to be in jail, that requires some action on my part.
The young boy, that I used to call my son-in-law until he corrected me, has tattoos and piercings. He worked at a bank. He wore clothes that allowed him to hide most, if not all, of his tattoos and removed his piercings during his working hours. I do not like tattoos or piercings; but, believe in his right to have them. I would not hire an assistant who had them.
I was Navy ROTC and Coast Guard certified by 13. I love Polynesia, it has always been special in my heart. I especially have had a love affair with Tahiti. I fell in love with the paintings of Gauguin. I studied Polynesia, my professor wanted me to become "the expert"; but, it was from love not a career. When I had traveled half the world I got a earring in my right ear. It was in recognition of having traveled half the world, no longer a polliwog.
The man I spoke about earlier who is very rich, he is old school and has over a thousand people who owe their jobs to him. He is accustomed to saying what he thinks and discussing with his employees their dress code. I do not work for him. I am very traditional in many ways, personal ways. When I came back from Hawaii, where I got my piercing the old fashioned way, the people who knew me were shocked. It was just a small gold ball; but, they figured I was trying to be younger because they did not understand my background.
Well, I met with the man who I spoke of and while we were talking he just kept turning to look at my left ear (right ear piercings have traditionally meant homosexual, left ear piercings were navy). I eventually removed my earring for religious beliefs. If not for my religious beliefs I would get old school Polynesian tattoos on my legs, that will surprise many people who know me. I would have it done the traditional way in Tahiti, it would take a month and hurt more than you can imagine. You might want to look it up.
You cannot have certain jobs in the military or intelligence if you have tattoos because they identify you. When the police arrest you, they photograph any tattoos for a reason. They also photograph scars. I do not have many scars, I heal very well. I have one and only one that will not go away. It is in the middle of my forehead where your "third eye" should be, where East Indians put the dot, I have had it since I was about four. I split my head open after being pushed down a hill into a brick column, square brick column and hit the corner. It looks like a tiny dimple at 50, it used to look like a five sided star.
We were talking about why I wouldn't hire an assistant who had tattoos or piercings. That is easy, because it gives away what you are thinking. When I meet someone in a business setting, we need time to trust each other, to develop our relationship. In Poker, we look for "tells", little movements that say what you have in your hand. Same thing in negotiations. I have many people that work for me; but, I only ever have one "assistant". It is the person who is allowed to go to negotiations with me. There are rules. Rule one is don't talk until we know we are on the same page. Tattoos are talking. When I wear a Hawaiian shirt to a negotiation, I am talking, when I wear a suit, I am talking.
I began by talking about Disneyland and ended up discussing my assistant, it all goes together. It is okay to have religious beliefs, it is okay to wear all kinds of clothes, it is okay to get tattoos if it is not against your beliefs; but, for all these choices come consequences. Sometimes they are appropriate, other times they are not. We should look beyond the obvious to the reasons. Are the reasons compelling or merely convenience? That is important. Be well, I hope you enjoyed this little post. First time I have felt it flow in a bit. Thanks for the opportunity to be heard.
Sorry, quick UPDATE. I have to thank my ex-wife for something. She was the one who taught me about clothes. She told me that men get angry and get in a fight, women, she said, figure out what they are going to wear and how to set the scene. She was naked and had just come out of the shower when she said she wanted a divorce. She never looked at me, she looked in the mirror, it was as I was leaving for work. Can you figure out what she was attempting to say, she was the one that taught me. She said it right after I kissed the back of her neck to head to work.
On Why Stephen Hawking is a Douche bag
The renowned scientist Stephen Hawking has written a new book. In it he explains that he can explain how the universe was created and that God is unnecessary. He is a douche bag. As my readers know, I do not cuss on this blog. The term douche bag is not cussing. I could have just as well called him a dirty diaper as my youngest once called my ex-wife. The youngest was about two years old and was upset about something and did not know any cuss words so she made up her own.
Back to the bag. DB Hawking has added nothing new in decades. His latest book is merely a restatement of the old string theory and multi-universe baloney. His theory requires that we believe there are 11 space-time dimensions, "vibrating strings, ... point particles, two-dimensional membranes, three-dimensional blobs and other objects that are more difficult to picture and occupy even more dimensions of space."
Nothing has changed, the fact that DB Hawking says it doesn't make it true, it is the baloney that still cannot be substantiated. His statement that spontaneous creation was inevitable is simply not true. The fact that the universe exists does not prove that it must exist, merely that it does.
If you have been reading my previous posts on quantum physics and the links you will see that his "new" theory is old and not supported by the findings of the current quantum physicists. Heck, he basis his theory on gravity and that cannot even be explained.
It appears to me that DB Hawking is just looking to sell his book and remain relevant. The question is why did he feel the need to bring God into his discussion at all, that is the questionable action. I have no problem with people telling me that they do not believe in God. If they ask me why I believe in him I will tell them, if they do not I will not push the issue. I do however have a problem with people attempting to push their belief that is no God on me and then try and use science to prove it.
This is my personal blog and I have the right to express my beliefs and opinions, nobody is forced to read it and everyone is free to read only the parts that interest them. Much of what I write here, if not most, I do not discuss with people unless they have an interest in it. My blog is not placed in the mass media, no news articles are written regarding what I say. Public figures need to choose their words more carefully.
I do not attack atheists or agnostics or other religions, I will discuss them. I will expose what others like the Rosicrucian's believe. I will debate what they believe; but, I do not attack them. I am Christian and I don't even attack Satanists, I have written about them. So the question is, why do so many scientists feel threatened by the possibility of the existence of God?
Let me simplify, science can never disprove that God exists. It is a logical impossibility, this is Philosophy 101. Science can only "prove" what does exist. That is it's limit. Beyond that, why bother trying to prove that God does not exist, to what end. It does not achieve the desired goal. All I need to prove is that I exist. I have already done that. It is enough proof that spirit exists, I have sentience. You can prove to yourself that you exist.
Quite awhile back I wrote about the fallacy of believing that the planet matters and you do not. Sentience, self awareness, is the single thing that anyone can prove and it proves that we matter. Rocks cannot feel pain, people can. A planet without people or a universe without sentient beings would be irrelevant. If we were not here then there would be nobody to make the universe have meaning. There would be nobody to enjoy it or experience it.
Yesterday a man strapped bombs to himself and took a number of people hostage at the Discovery Channel. He issued a Manifesto. It is the link. In it he says we must stop breeding disgusting human babies. Now I don't know about you; but, I looooove me some babies. I am a baby sniffer, love to smell them when they are just born, I love the feel of them and their little tiny toes. It takes a lot of lies for someone to hate babies. It takes a lot of abuse.
It is our nature to love babies, all animals love their own babies. Babies are life and life is everything. Life is hope, without life there is no hope, just rocks. The man that held the hostages said he was changed by watching Al Gore's "An Inconvenient Truth". He was fed garbage and this is what we get. The belief that you and I do not matter is the filth.
Rocks and rabbits do not matter more than you. You and I matter more than anything else because we give meaning to everything else. The evil in this world is continually telling us how little we matter, how temporary we are, how evil we are. It says that Satan accuses us night and day before God. We give him a lot to charge us with; but, even he would say we matter.
DB Hawking, lets get back to him. Rather than prove his theories, he brings up God. I do not need to bring up God to prove gravity. I do not need to bring up God to prove that I have sentience. So why bring up something you do not believe in?
I believe DB Hawking will later come out and say that he was attempting to disprove God, merely saying he could prove that the universe could exist without their being a need for their to be a God. You see his real problem is that quantum physics says nothing makes sense, nothing should exist. Read the previous posts and their links. He needs to prove that God does not need to exist in order to "save" quantum physics from proving that God does exist. He has failed. He had to fall back on a intellectual wedgie.
Alternate universes are a logical wedgie, they cannot be proven or dis-proven. Because alternate universes cannot be dis-proven, their acceptance is un-scientific. They violate the rules of science just like traveling backwards in time does. These are fundamental scientific rules. They also violate the number rule of science, can you duplicate it. The big bang cannot be duplicated, so to accept it is to accept something that violates sciences rules, it is just a theory, at best.
YOU MATTER. I don't care who you are or what sins you have committed, you matter. You must experience this existence, that is pretty powerful, a rock does not have to watch it's parents die, it's children be born, the pains and trials of life, a rock does not grow. Growth is painful, yet, so rewarding.
All of this garbage that is currently being promoted is not really aimed at eliminating people. It's true purpose is to limit growth. It's true purpose is to limit growth to those that the people on top believe are deserving. It is funded by those people who run this place. You do matter; but, not to them. That is the truth.
Back to the bag. DB Hawking has added nothing new in decades. His latest book is merely a restatement of the old string theory and multi-universe baloney. His theory requires that we believe there are 11 space-time dimensions, "vibrating strings, ... point particles, two-dimensional membranes, three-dimensional blobs and other objects that are more difficult to picture and occupy even more dimensions of space."
Nothing has changed, the fact that DB Hawking says it doesn't make it true, it is the baloney that still cannot be substantiated. His statement that spontaneous creation was inevitable is simply not true. The fact that the universe exists does not prove that it must exist, merely that it does.
If you have been reading my previous posts on quantum physics and the links you will see that his "new" theory is old and not supported by the findings of the current quantum physicists. Heck, he basis his theory on gravity and that cannot even be explained.
It appears to me that DB Hawking is just looking to sell his book and remain relevant. The question is why did he feel the need to bring God into his discussion at all, that is the questionable action. I have no problem with people telling me that they do not believe in God. If they ask me why I believe in him I will tell them, if they do not I will not push the issue. I do however have a problem with people attempting to push their belief that is no God on me and then try and use science to prove it.
This is my personal blog and I have the right to express my beliefs and opinions, nobody is forced to read it and everyone is free to read only the parts that interest them. Much of what I write here, if not most, I do not discuss with people unless they have an interest in it. My blog is not placed in the mass media, no news articles are written regarding what I say. Public figures need to choose their words more carefully.
I do not attack atheists or agnostics or other religions, I will discuss them. I will expose what others like the Rosicrucian's believe. I will debate what they believe; but, I do not attack them. I am Christian and I don't even attack Satanists, I have written about them. So the question is, why do so many scientists feel threatened by the possibility of the existence of God?
Let me simplify, science can never disprove that God exists. It is a logical impossibility, this is Philosophy 101. Science can only "prove" what does exist. That is it's limit. Beyond that, why bother trying to prove that God does not exist, to what end. It does not achieve the desired goal. All I need to prove is that I exist. I have already done that. It is enough proof that spirit exists, I have sentience. You can prove to yourself that you exist.
Quite awhile back I wrote about the fallacy of believing that the planet matters and you do not. Sentience, self awareness, is the single thing that anyone can prove and it proves that we matter. Rocks cannot feel pain, people can. A planet without people or a universe without sentient beings would be irrelevant. If we were not here then there would be nobody to make the universe have meaning. There would be nobody to enjoy it or experience it.
Yesterday a man strapped bombs to himself and took a number of people hostage at the Discovery Channel. He issued a Manifesto. It is the link. In it he says we must stop breeding disgusting human babies. Now I don't know about you; but, I looooove me some babies. I am a baby sniffer, love to smell them when they are just born, I love the feel of them and their little tiny toes. It takes a lot of lies for someone to hate babies. It takes a lot of abuse.
It is our nature to love babies, all animals love their own babies. Babies are life and life is everything. Life is hope, without life there is no hope, just rocks. The man that held the hostages said he was changed by watching Al Gore's "An Inconvenient Truth". He was fed garbage and this is what we get. The belief that you and I do not matter is the filth.
Rocks and rabbits do not matter more than you. You and I matter more than anything else because we give meaning to everything else. The evil in this world is continually telling us how little we matter, how temporary we are, how evil we are. It says that Satan accuses us night and day before God. We give him a lot to charge us with; but, even he would say we matter.
DB Hawking, lets get back to him. Rather than prove his theories, he brings up God. I do not need to bring up God to prove gravity. I do not need to bring up God to prove that I have sentience. So why bring up something you do not believe in?
I believe DB Hawking will later come out and say that he was attempting to disprove God, merely saying he could prove that the universe could exist without their being a need for their to be a God. You see his real problem is that quantum physics says nothing makes sense, nothing should exist. Read the previous posts and their links. He needs to prove that God does not need to exist in order to "save" quantum physics from proving that God does exist. He has failed. He had to fall back on a intellectual wedgie.
Alternate universes are a logical wedgie, they cannot be proven or dis-proven. Because alternate universes cannot be dis-proven, their acceptance is un-scientific. They violate the rules of science just like traveling backwards in time does. These are fundamental scientific rules. They also violate the number rule of science, can you duplicate it. The big bang cannot be duplicated, so to accept it is to accept something that violates sciences rules, it is just a theory, at best.
YOU MATTER. I don't care who you are or what sins you have committed, you matter. You must experience this existence, that is pretty powerful, a rock does not have to watch it's parents die, it's children be born, the pains and trials of life, a rock does not grow. Growth is painful, yet, so rewarding.
All of this garbage that is currently being promoted is not really aimed at eliminating people. It's true purpose is to limit growth. It's true purpose is to limit growth to those that the people on top believe are deserving. It is funded by those people who run this place. You do matter; but, not to them. That is the truth.
The Greatest Pain
I have felt many pains, the ex cheated on me. I know having your heart ripped out and stepped on. Pain is nothing to me. The worst pain was when my not-ex-soninlaw told me that the girl I had raised since she was two was not my daughter. That is worst pain I have ever had. He is fxxxing a-hole. That was the worst pain.
He wanted to hurt me and he did. She failed to heal the pain. She failed, to try and allowed it to linger. I spent my life trying to make her life better and she left me to twist in the wind. How sad. I always get up. How sad that she did not help when I gave my life for her. Where were you when they thought I was dying? You said nothing.
My friends stood by me, you did not. You hid. Shame on you all. Sean, open your mouth up and you will hear the rest, you ungrateful bastard. Show you have some sencwe you ungrateful basxard. You no longer get a pass, ready to play?
He wanted to hurt me and he did. She failed to heal the pain. She failed, to try and allowed it to linger. I spent my life trying to make her life better and she left me to twist in the wind. How sad. I always get up. How sad that she did not help when I gave my life for her. Where were you when they thought I was dying? You said nothing.
My friends stood by me, you did not. You hid. Shame on you all. Sean, open your mouth up and you will hear the rest, you ungrateful bastard. Show you have some sencwe you ungrateful basxard. You no longer get a pass, ready to play?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)