Wednesday, October 24, 2012

Overtired and can't sleep

I have been up for two days, had to take someone to the hospital and drive a long distance to do so. I have passed tired, I am tired and wide awake. I hate that. Everything at the hospital went better than expected, just a long day.Over tired and I have spent the last few hours in deep debate.



Monday, October 22, 2012

International Currency Control

There are some things that I have predicted that I don't really like. One of the things I have talked about is how we will see a new monetary system. I have long believed that it will be tied to eliminating national debt. I have believed that because it is the cookie that will get people to accept the new system. I am sorry to say that I appear to have been right.

The Telegraph - IMF's epic plan to conjure away debt and dethrone bankers

Here is a link to the actual working paper by the IMF. The Chicago Plan Revisited.

Basically, what they are calling for is an end to private credit that is not asset backed. With the government owning 80% of all housing and the Federal Reserve buying the rest of the mortgages, it would now become a government asset and back up our currency.

Many people took advantage of the housing boom, they took out debt with no intention to repay it unless they could sell their house for much more than they paid for it. The banks were happy to lend and the rates were corrupted by LIBOR. Everyone was cheating all the way up and down the chain; but, it was intentional and the end game is to crash all the currencies together and then bring in this new system. They got everyone to hate the bankers and now it is time for whoever has been chosen to come to our rescue and save us from the fate of Greece.

Sunday, October 21, 2012

I forgot today was an anniversary

I have never claimed to love life, I don't care much for this world and never have. Today however is anniversary of something that really made me hate this world, I forgot. It is the one death date that I actually remember and I have so many to choose from, I have lost so many family and friends. I remember this one date with sorrow, the only day that I am willing to attach an emotion to.

Don't attach emotions to dates, it is a mistake, dates are meaningless, merely attempt to remind us of pain. It is the issues that matter.

Child Molesters in Power

I am going to post a lot of information and it will take a lot of time for you to view it all; but, I ask that you take the time if you want to really understand how prevalent pedophilia is and more importantly, how organized and protected it is. I beg my readers to watch the video on "Boys for Sale", if you have ever enjoyed my writing, I beg you to watch the video all the way through. It was made 31 years ago and accurately discussed things that we only know now.

Here are some links to a video about a famous English performer, after 50 years it is has come out that he was most likely a child molester. The man died a couple of years ago; but, why he was able to do what he did for decades with knowledge by others is the real question.

YouTube - JIMMY SAVILLE - EXPOSURE - THE OTHER SIDE OF JIMMY SAVILLE 1 / 5

YouTube - JIMMY SAVILLE - EXPOSURE - THE OTHER SIDE OF JIMMY SAVILLE 2 / 5

YouTube - JIMMY SAVILLE - EXPOSURE - THE OTHER SIDE OF JIMMY SAVILLE 3 / 5

YouTube - JIMMY SAVILLE - EXPOSURE - THE OTHER SIDE OF JIMMY SAVILLE 4 / 5

YouTube - JIMMY SAVILLE - EXPOSURE - THE OTHER SIDE OF JIMMY SAVILLE 5 / 5

Most Americans probably don't know about this man or about the enormous scandal it has caused for the BBC (British State Owned Television). There is a lot of talk in England about what happened and there was another documentary that was to be shown on the BBS that was not released and was cancelled by the BBC. The other documentary was about why the police never acted or investigated the cases (hundreds if the news is to be believed).

MailOnline - Leaked Newsnight emails accuse BBC of issuing misleading statements over cancelled Savile exposé

What I find interesting is the sly way in which the media in England has attempted to hide what happened and minimize it's importance. His nephew was interviewed and goes off asking why this is only being brought up now. A fair question and a lie at the same time, later in the interview this exact same nephew mentions how in 1977 the police investigated Mr. Saville for molesting kids. Here is the interview.

YouTube - Jimmy Savile's nephew 'disgusted' by child abuse claims

Yahoo News - Reuters - Teen says Sandusky chased him in car as he ran away: ABC

Mr. Sandusky was a Penn State Coach who went molesting kids for years and apparently because he was a winning coach, nobody did anything.

YouTube - Corey Feldman exposes the pedophile hollywood elite

YouTube - The Franklin Cover-Up - John DeCamp - Full film

YouTube - Conspiracy of Silence: The Franklin Cover Up - Censored Documentary! This video never aired, it was purchased and destroyed days before it was to air on PBS, sort of in the same way that BBC pulled the documentary of pedophilia and Mr. Saville.

This a video from the early 80s. YouTube - Boys for Sale, 1/2

YouTube - Boys for Sale, 2/2

I need to point out something, this is not about homosexuality, this is about molesting children as a power trip. They do it because they can and they can get away with it because they are organized, someone even mentions that in Part I. The man states that these boys are being used by straight men who get violent with them.

Hope you have a great week. That last video really got to me. I had never seen it before.

Thursday, October 18, 2012

Lets smile and listen to unique things

I wish to be lighthearted; therefore I shall post some less known songs, original things by unique individuals.

YouTube - Klaus Nomi - You Don't Own Me

YouTube - Buffalo Gals - Malcolm McLaren (Original Video) Hip Hop Classic

YouTube - Lene Lovich Bird Song

YouTube - Falco - Der Kommissar

YouTube - X - The New World (Original Music Video)

YouTube - "Get Dancin'" by Disco-Tex and the Sex-O-Lettes

YouTube - David Bowie - Suffragette city

YouTube - Good Girls Don't - The Knack

YouTube - Devo Mongoloid

YouTube - Jackson Browne - Lawyers in Love

YouTube - Sousa - The Washington Post March

YouTube - patti smith,because the night

YouTube - Siouxsie And The Banshees Spellbound

YouTube - Siouxsie And The Banshees Spellbound

YouTube - Alice Cooper - Generation Landslide

YouTube - RICKY NELSON-GARDEN PARTY

YouTube - Beach Boys - Good Vibrations

I think now I will post some remakes that truly brought something new to the songs.

YouTube - Jose Feliciano - Light my fire

YouTube - Devo - [I Can't Get No] Satisfaction (Video)

YouTube - Money (That's What I Want) The Flying Lizards

YouTube - Mad World - Gary Jules

YouTube - fear and loathing in las vegas music video - dead kennedys

YouTube - The Beach Boys - Sloop John B


YouTube - The True Lyrics to Louie Louie

YouTube - soulja boy crank that remix by Travis Barker

YouTube - Frank Sinatra - My Way (1969). Yep, it was a remake, Paula Anka wrote it and sang it.

YouTube - Three Dog Night Never Been To Spain

YouTube - Taco - Puttin' on the Ritz (Original Uncensored Version). You may remember the song was also sung in Mel Brooks film, "Young Frankenstein". Some odd tidbit that I remember is that the song was a top ten hit and was remade every decade for 60 years as a top ten hit. Someone should do a rap version.

YouTube - Gun's N' Roses - Knockin On Heavens Door (a particular favorite).

How about some that I just pick because I like them.

YouTube - Guns N' Roses - November Rain

YouTube - Jefferson Starship: With Your Love

YouTube - West Side Story 1961 - "I feel pretty"

You get no more from me tonight. Have a great weekend.

Visited with a friend

I needed sometime to myself and took it today, I didn't have anything important at work and just wanted to think about some things, so, I took a vacation day and laid in bed thinking until around 2. A friend called and wanted to go to dinner as we had previously discussed and we did. Later we drove by his new place and just sat outside and talked. It was nice to visit with him and later his wife.

His wife commented on how much better I looked, I had not seen her in a fair amount of time. As raggedy as I may be now, it is a vast improvement over the last five years. I think I am finally seeing the light at the end of the tunnel. That sure was a long tunnel, lol.

Another friend of mine often reminds me of an old Chinese saying that the person who finishes a journey is never the same as the one who started it. My friend and I have both changed on our journeys, still us; but, with new perspectives. I don't know that I would have liked the younger me, I was very determined and very decisive, okay, I could be very harsh.

My friend and I talked about the world, careers and personal matters. I forgot all about needing time to myself, what I really needed was time with a friend, time with someone who just wanted to be with me, no pressure, just peace. I like peace and hate drama, I am not afraid of a fight, I just prefer cooperation.

I have been reading about how the biggest internet troll (a person who goes on websites in order to create drama) has been identified and how he promptly was fired from his job. There was also a lot of discussion about how the government asked to remove the YouTube video that supposedly upset Muslims and then there was the story about the young girl who committed suicide a week ago because of "cyber-bullying". Lots of stories regarding what should and should not be allowed on the internet.

There is a difference between private speech and public speech. There is a difference between what you say to a child and what you say to an adult. The internet is totally unregulated and people post child pornography, nobody is for that, well, very few are in favor of it. Yet, the internet is our form of communication and the question becomes will there be private areas, like e-mail or chat?

Do we believe in innocent until proven guilty? Now, do you believe that the government should be allowed to read every e-mail you write when they are the ones destroying the post office? How much do you want them to know about everyone? Would you let them monitor everyone 24 hours a day to make sure that nobody is a child molester? I want you to think about that.

It is not an all or nothing question. Where should the line be between internet "freedom" and internet restrictions. It is one thing for me to send a personal e-mail to a friend where I tell him that I have just shot up heroin and quite another thing to post it on my Facebook page. One is a private communication and the other is a public admission.

The current method, at least one of them, is that the government does keyword searches on both public and private communications, anything that used the internet. Now lets say that I sent an e-mail to a friend saying that I wanted to rape someone, would you be comfortable with the government reading my private conversation because they could investigate whether or not I was really going to rape someone? While I would never joke about rape, there are people who do and have no intention of raping anyone. I am not agreeing with such jokes, I have daughters. Still, at what point in time should the government be allowed to read my mail?

If the government had read every piece of mail since the post office was started, they could have arrested a lot of child molesters; but, we wanted to be able to discuss things with family members that the government did not read, things like when a child died or when a spouse cheated or when we made a mistake. We won't have those conversations when we all understand just how not private the internet is.

Tuesday, October 16, 2012

A Community Activist in L.A., a Movie and Libya

There is a community activist in Los Angeles, his name is John Walsh and he has a website, here is the link. HollywoodHighland.org is the site. Now we are going to follow a little trail, I hope you enjoy the ride.

The movie trailer called "The Innocence of the Muslims" was original a full length film titled "The Innocence of Bin Laden". There is only claimed to be one showing of the film ever and that was in Hollywood at a theater on Vine Street. Prior to the film being shown, Mr. Walsh had complained to the Los Angeles City Council and had sent an e-mail to all of the press in town about the film.

According to the Los Angeles Times, nobody saw the film. Anti-Muslim film: ‘Nobody showed up’ for Hollywood screening. Then we have this article from The Daily Beast - Anti-Muslim Movie Maker a Meth Cooker. The article states that at two policemen had been at the theater the night of the first screening and spoke to a man claiming to be the producer who had a western accent. We are now told that he has a foreign accent.

I guess we are not supposed to look into the history of the film. Los Angeles has a very large Jewish community and a large Muslim community. Both of the communities are sensitive about being attacked. Neither made a big deal about the film and the only media it got was by Mr. Walsh, even though the articles state that he had notified all of the media. It seems the only people that may have seen the movie may have been people involved in it; but, I doubt that was true. We know that police were on the scene and it is highly likely that if anyone did watch the movie, at least one of them was working for the police, FBI, Homeland Security or a Jewish or Muslim organization.

I have a problem believing that Muslims attacked the Libyan embassy because of this film as was originally claimed. In fact, we now know that the attack was planned prior to the movie trailer. So, what is going on here. Why did the media attempt to blame the film when it so glaringly ignored it when it was shown in Hollywood?

Just so my readers know, the LAPD has a section that works directly with Homeland Security on a daily basis, what do you want to bet that the officers that were sent to the theater were with that group? If someone is showing a movie in Hollywood that claims to be pro-Bin Laden, you send the anti-terrorist police, you don't send the ones that work on movie reviews.

The only known screening of the film was on June 23rd. On September 11th there is an attack on the U.S. Embassy and our Ambassador who is considered a hero in Libya is killed. Libyans protest his killing and track down the party believed responsible.

Now if you go back to the Los Angeles Times article, we are told that on September 10th, some crackpot idiot preacher said he was going to show the film on his Anti-Muslim day, but, it also points out that the new films trailer had already been translated into Arabic and posted on YouTube for months with no response. There is a report of one Muslim cleric denouncing the film and that occurs BEFORE the wacko pastor said he was going to show it and in the end we do not have any report of the wacko pastor ever showing it. Think about that. The Muslim baiting pastor who has burned the Koran in the past said he would show it and then didn't. The media didn't even pick up on his saying he would show it because the movie did not exist and still does not.

If you are confused it is not surprising. The original film was titled "Desert Warriors" and that is how it was pitched to the production crew. The film was made and was originally called, "The Innocence of Bin Laden" and was promoted as a pro-terrorist movie. The "movie" that was posted on YouTube was a trailer for a movie called "The Innocence of the Muslims"; but, that movie did not exist.

When the movie was shown in Hollywood nobody other than the cops even showed up. Here is a link to the video. YouTube - Muhammad Movie Trailer. It is just about the worse piece of film making I have ever witnessed. If you can bare to watch it you will agree. Even the actors said they just thought they were getting paid to be in a horrible movie and that what was shown was not the movie they thought they were going to be in.

Now, the clown that claims to be the film maker also claims that he was given $5 million dollars to make the film which looks like it cost about $50,000 to make. We are also being told that he used to make meth and went to jail multiple times. Are we to believe that an ex-con was paid to make a film such as this?

Why did the mainstream media and the government blame what happened in Libya on the film when in fact they knew the film had nothing to do with it, it had been planned well in advance of the September statements by both the cleric and the pastor and nobody to this day has seen the film because it was never made, the video is merely small cuts that have been re-edited with words being dubbed over the original actors words.

After the embassy attack, the supposed movie maker, who now has an accent, is arrested for a parole violation and goes to court in a manner that you cannot make out his face. We are told that they had to figure out who he was, that the federal government did not know who the real Sam Bacile was; but, my friends and dear readers, that is a bald face lie. Remember the article that said that a minimum of two police officers spoke to him at the screening back in June. I want you to sit back and let that sink in.

Here is what we are supposed to believe. We are supposed to believe that some ex-con scammed some anti-Muslims to make a film that attacked the Muslim faith. I guess we are then supposed to believe that this modern day Ed Wood made the film, showed it in Hollywood once and pocketed most of the money. A failed film and the conman keeps the money, oh, they haven't told us that story quite yet. Instead he was put back in jail for causing problems by his free speech; but, is he?

Lets say for a minute that the film maker was a con artist that bilked some Muslim haters out of enough money to make the film and lets even say that he kept most of the money and put out a garbage film that he thought nobody would ever see and they didn't when it was shown in Hollywood. WHY WOULD HE THEN TRANSLATE IT AND PUT IT ON YOUTUBE AND DRAW ATTENTION TO HIMSELF? You do not publicize ripping people off and anyone that had paid him to make the movie would have been outraged when nobody paid to see it, it had no effect and brought on a police investigation. The film maker knew the police were investigating him because they spoke to him in June.

I feel like screaming, "WAKE UP, WAKE UP, WAKE UP". This is some of the shoddiest work I have ever seen in the press. The press talked about how the movie maker was a shady character, heck, the whole thing doesn't make and sense and stinks. They say that reporters are supposed to follow the money and nobody has followed the bank trail that funded the film. We are told that they think anti-Muslim groups funded it; but, the movie that was pitched and financed and made was not anti-Muhammad or anti-Islam, at least not according to the actors and people involved.

Now here is my final word. If it were not for a community activist, none of the rest of the story would have come out. I know that now and again another community activist, Zuma Dogg, reads my blog and I also know that he knows Mr. Walsh because he also attends the L.A. City Council meetings and has done so for years. Mr. Zuma Dogg has a much greater following than do I; but, if he reads this I do hope that he asks Mr. Walsh about what I have said and about what happened.

The question I ask is who benefited from all of this? The only known effect was that the media claimed that the film was what caused riots and a disturbance in the middle east. I should point out something that most people forget, the largest group of Muslims are not Arab, they are Asian. They don't talk about that in the media often. We didn't have riots in the Asian countries that have lots of Muslims, we had it in the oil owning nations in Arabia. The same ones that have either removed or are in the process of removing their governments.

You might want to believe that I am just reading into the tea leafs, okay. You might want to believe the garbage we are being told in the media. You might hate Muslims and think that this stupid movie caused riots and killings in Arabia. Believe all of that if you will; but, what we do know is that the police did talk to the film maker and knew exactly who he was months before there were any problems, three months before and then we are to believe that they didn't. Which is it, did the police go to the screening in June as they stated to the newspaper or did they not? If they did and they are to be believed, then they knew who he was. If they did then they made a report, that is a requirement. If they made a report then Homeland Security knew because they work directly on a daily basis with the LAPD. We are being deceived by the media and the government. The question, is why?

The mainstream media originally told us that the Libya attack was because of the retarded video on YouTube, then the media began investigating who made the film and found out that he was not a real person, then we are told that the attack had been pre-planned and had nothing to do with the movie and finally we are being told that Hillary Clinton takes all responsibility for what happened and not having provided the embassy with more security as had been requested. Do you know what the government does when it is caught in a lie, it muddies the water, it changes the subject and it looks for a new person to blame in muddy waters.

I do not anticipate that my lone post on this will make a difference; but, Mr. Walsh and his post did and I have time to write so I should say things that are of interest to someone. I hope every reader found it of some interest, I write for you.