MSN - USA Today - More renters than homeowners in Detroit. The future will be all renters and a landowner class. That is what happens when there is no middle class.
McClatchy DC Bureau - FBI’s Russian-influence probe includes a look at Breitbart, InfoWars news sites. Why are we investigating the free press? It is not an attack on the "alt-right", it is an attack upon free speech.
MSN - Schiff: I have 'grave concerns' over Nunes's surveillance claim. Congressman Schiff is concerned that congressman Nunes pointed out that he had been given intelligence documents that named Americans in the transcripts, which by the way is illegal unless they are the ones being investigated pursuant to a court order or a FISA order. Schiff doesn't care about illegal surveillance, only telling people it is going on.
WTOP - Associated Press - Australia pair are first foreigners to own US radio stations. Communist China is buying up Hollywood studios and our mass media is being purchased by people in foreign countries. How fair do you think the news media will be?
YouTube - Mark Dice - CNN and MSNBC Caught Using Same “LIVE” Guest at Same Time Doing Different Interviews!!
YouTube - The Know - YouTube BOYCOTT By Advertisers! Break out #YouTubeIsOverParty - The Know Tech News. The media hates competition and intends to eliminate anyone other than themselves getting money from advertisers.
Sydney Morning Herald - The real politics of envy isn't about wealth: it's about the city we wish we had. It is about community, not envy.
Sydney Morning Herald - Free trade opportunism? How Chinese Premier Li's visit positions US on the outer. Funny how globalists never complain about China having closed borders or their abuses of the Tibetan people.
YouTube - boogie2988 - #YoutubeAgeGate, Restricted Mode, and LGBTQ+ community. YouTube is beginning to restrict YouTubers, even innocent content creators who talk about videogames.
Saturday, March 25, 2017
Friday, March 24, 2017
Rights, What do You Have a Right To?
When you are born, you are born to an equal right to everything in the world. People are not born entitled to more than anyone else. We are all born as deserving as everyone else is born. There is no moral justification for accepting that men can be born slaves. I think everyone agrees with this in principal; but, then it gets political.
How do you justify saying that you have a right to be born into being your slave? The kings and queens actually believe that the gods or god has found them specially deserving of owning others and countries. Let me put it another way, what do you the right to inherit? What advantage are you entitled to over others because of whose vagina you came out of?
As a society, what do new members have a right to once allowed here? If one only has a right to what they "earn" then you don't have a right to inherit ANYTHING. You didn't earn your parents stuff.
If you tell children that they have a right to NOTHING, then they have no reason to respect your right to anything either. If you tell them they are born into debt, then they have moral right to take anything they can from you because if they can be born into debt and you are born into wealth, they are born slaves and don't have to respect anything you have.
Let me put this is a historical perspective, consider Polynesia. Children were born on islands where there we only 2,000 people. If one person or even two could own everything on that island and you were just born, what moral reason would you have for accepting that. When one person owns and controls everything you are living in a despot controlled totalitarian world. That is how it was in England. You could not hunt in the Kings woodlands.
Look beyond all the social training you have had and ask the most fundamental questions outlined above. When less than .01% of all the people born on earth are automatically entitled to own 90% of all that is, you live in a despot controlled, totalitarian oligarchy. For there to be a social contract, nobody can come into this world entitled to nothing or in debt or in slavery while another is born owning everything.
Rights do not exist unless they come from God and that applies to Atheists too. Sometimes it is just easier for them to see. Funny, I am not talking to the atheists, I am talking to the Christians. Some will say that God has chosen our leaders, that may have been chosen at one time, does it apply today. God spoke to Solomon, do you think he spoke to Bill Clinton? How bout George Bush? What about Stalin, Hitler or Pol Pot?
What you are seeing right now in politics internationally is the wealthy moving to establish a world where you own nothing and are born having a right to nothing and will be unable to earn anything. That is what happens when human labor is no longer needed and you are not born wealthy.
I do not know why so many are suddenly reading this blog, I almost wrote about the relationship between men and women today and may finish that post yet; but, I was watching a video with Kristen Bell at some sort of women's conference and she said something that made me think of this and I don't remember what it was. Still, this is what it made me consider.
How do you justify saying that you have a right to be born into being your slave? The kings and queens actually believe that the gods or god has found them specially deserving of owning others and countries. Let me put it another way, what do you the right to inherit? What advantage are you entitled to over others because of whose vagina you came out of?
As a society, what do new members have a right to once allowed here? If one only has a right to what they "earn" then you don't have a right to inherit ANYTHING. You didn't earn your parents stuff.
If you tell children that they have a right to NOTHING, then they have no reason to respect your right to anything either. If you tell them they are born into debt, then they have moral right to take anything they can from you because if they can be born into debt and you are born into wealth, they are born slaves and don't have to respect anything you have.
Let me put this is a historical perspective, consider Polynesia. Children were born on islands where there we only 2,000 people. If one person or even two could own everything on that island and you were just born, what moral reason would you have for accepting that. When one person owns and controls everything you are living in a despot controlled totalitarian world. That is how it was in England. You could not hunt in the Kings woodlands.
Look beyond all the social training you have had and ask the most fundamental questions outlined above. When less than .01% of all the people born on earth are automatically entitled to own 90% of all that is, you live in a despot controlled, totalitarian oligarchy. For there to be a social contract, nobody can come into this world entitled to nothing or in debt or in slavery while another is born owning everything.
Rights do not exist unless they come from God and that applies to Atheists too. Sometimes it is just easier for them to see. Funny, I am not talking to the atheists, I am talking to the Christians. Some will say that God has chosen our leaders, that may have been chosen at one time, does it apply today. God spoke to Solomon, do you think he spoke to Bill Clinton? How bout George Bush? What about Stalin, Hitler or Pol Pot?
What you are seeing right now in politics internationally is the wealthy moving to establish a world where you own nothing and are born having a right to nothing and will be unable to earn anything. That is what happens when human labor is no longer needed and you are not born wealthy.
I do not know why so many are suddenly reading this blog, I almost wrote about the relationship between men and women today and may finish that post yet; but, I was watching a video with Kristen Bell at some sort of women's conference and she said something that made me think of this and I don't remember what it was. Still, this is what it made me consider.
Wednesday, March 22, 2017
Some Clarity on Reality the Media Intentionally Confuses
The mass media is basically propaganda. It is a tool of global corporations and the interests of their owners to influence public policy and elections. Currently the corporate media is just involved in spin and propaganda. How dishonest is the media, well we know that Donna Brazile, the head of the DNC, gave debate questions to Hillary Clinton while working for CNN. and that other reporters asked Clinton's people if they wanted to edit or change their stories. While that is not illegal, it is certainly dishonest and is a form of election tampering; but, nobody seems to care.
The Trump Russia Connection - Corporatists Politicians on the left are attempting to claim that there was improper collusion between Trump and Putin. The media claims that if Trump's team ever spoke to anyone to Russia some law was violated. This is simply not true. The truth is that politicians regularly meet with foreign officials. I personally have met with government representatives from China, Israel, Singapore and other nations while working for the government. The media often discusses how "Russia hacked the election without ever defining hacking. Lets talk about that for a minute.
The term hacking is when you go online and "hack" into someone else's account. To hack an election would therefore be to hack the voting machines and according to the 50 states involved and our intelligence agencies, NO voting machines were hacked. This was further evidenced by the recounts which found no hacking. What does this mean, it means the election was NOT hacked. Now some have claimed that because RT (Russia's version of BBC America) spoke positively about Trump as compared to Clinton that this somehow was illegal or improper. IT IS NOT. In fact the BBC did the opposite, disparaging Trump and praising Clinton. Foreign countries have concerns over American policies.
Another approach the media has taken is to claim that Trump has a Russia connection because he sold units in his building to Russians. What a shock. People from all over the world bought properties in Trump's properties. That is how developers make their money, by selling properties and that is also not illegal or suspicious. The truth is that Trump has NO properties in Russia.
The whole narrative is garbage. As for claims that Russia hacked the DNC servers, also garbage. Lets start with the fact that the DNC has refused to turn over their servers to the FBI to even be examined. This is an important point, how can the media make claims without any proof only the self serving statements by a company that worked for the DNC?
Did Obama Wiretap Trump Tower? - So President Trump tweeted that Obama had Trump tower wiretapped. The media prefers to play verbiage games rather than address the issue. Lets start with this point, after the election President Obama came out and instructed the intelligence agencies to investigate any Trump Russia connections and any Russian influence on the election. He also stated he wanted the report prior to his leaving office.
Many in the media have claimed that Trump was not "wiretapped" and while this is technically true it is also insincere. Phones are not technically "wiretapped" this is because cell phones are instead intercepted as they are transmitted over the airwaves and are not carried over physical telephone lines anymore.
So what do we now know. We know that conversations inside Trump Tower were recorded by the government under Obama. We know that there are transcripts and recordings of some of those conversations and we know that it is illegal to record said conversations without a warrant or permission from a FISA court. The defense used by the media to this is to say that the recordings were "incidental" to other investigations. Huh? We committed surveillance illegally on Americans in America; but, it was an accident. That is patently stupid. It also came out today that Trump himself was recorded during this surveillance; but, again that seems to have been another accident. Who buys this garbage?
Whether you like Trump or hate him, we should not accept what the media spins. I will say it again. Six companies own 90% of all the mas media in the United States. We do not have an independent media, we have a corporate controlled media that is globalist and represents globalist rather than American interests. We need to break up the big media giants using anti-trust laws so that a variety of voices can be heard.
The Trump Russia Connection - Corporatists Politicians on the left are attempting to claim that there was improper collusion between Trump and Putin. The media claims that if Trump's team ever spoke to anyone to Russia some law was violated. This is simply not true. The truth is that politicians regularly meet with foreign officials. I personally have met with government representatives from China, Israel, Singapore and other nations while working for the government. The media often discusses how "Russia hacked the election without ever defining hacking. Lets talk about that for a minute.
The term hacking is when you go online and "hack" into someone else's account. To hack an election would therefore be to hack the voting machines and according to the 50 states involved and our intelligence agencies, NO voting machines were hacked. This was further evidenced by the recounts which found no hacking. What does this mean, it means the election was NOT hacked. Now some have claimed that because RT (Russia's version of BBC America) spoke positively about Trump as compared to Clinton that this somehow was illegal or improper. IT IS NOT. In fact the BBC did the opposite, disparaging Trump and praising Clinton. Foreign countries have concerns over American policies.
Another approach the media has taken is to claim that Trump has a Russia connection because he sold units in his building to Russians. What a shock. People from all over the world bought properties in Trump's properties. That is how developers make their money, by selling properties and that is also not illegal or suspicious. The truth is that Trump has NO properties in Russia.
The whole narrative is garbage. As for claims that Russia hacked the DNC servers, also garbage. Lets start with the fact that the DNC has refused to turn over their servers to the FBI to even be examined. This is an important point, how can the media make claims without any proof only the self serving statements by a company that worked for the DNC?
Did Obama Wiretap Trump Tower? - So President Trump tweeted that Obama had Trump tower wiretapped. The media prefers to play verbiage games rather than address the issue. Lets start with this point, after the election President Obama came out and instructed the intelligence agencies to investigate any Trump Russia connections and any Russian influence on the election. He also stated he wanted the report prior to his leaving office.
Many in the media have claimed that Trump was not "wiretapped" and while this is technically true it is also insincere. Phones are not technically "wiretapped" this is because cell phones are instead intercepted as they are transmitted over the airwaves and are not carried over physical telephone lines anymore.
So what do we now know. We know that conversations inside Trump Tower were recorded by the government under Obama. We know that there are transcripts and recordings of some of those conversations and we know that it is illegal to record said conversations without a warrant or permission from a FISA court. The defense used by the media to this is to say that the recordings were "incidental" to other investigations. Huh? We committed surveillance illegally on Americans in America; but, it was an accident. That is patently stupid. It also came out today that Trump himself was recorded during this surveillance; but, again that seems to have been another accident. Who buys this garbage?
Whether you like Trump or hate him, we should not accept what the media spins. I will say it again. Six companies own 90% of all the mas media in the United States. We do not have an independent media, we have a corporate controlled media that is globalist and represents globalist rather than American interests. We need to break up the big media giants using anti-trust laws so that a variety of voices can be heard.
You Have To Keep an Eye on Politicians Making Investing Decisions
We are continuing to see a couple hundred views per day. I do hope that those who enjoy my ramblings would be kind enough to send others here to check out the site. I am currently considering posting on YouTube. I would probably make videos with no pictures of me, just illustrative pictures and a voice recording.
I don't have a problem with public speaking, I am just not sure if I want my face on the internet. The truth is that blogging began dying out just as I started this blog. The chance of getting heard is greater on YouTube than it is on blogger. Two things I do not like about vlogging are the facts that it forces one to act faster and it's focus on images. I prefer the written word; but, if the words are not heard it does not matter and format determines distribution. I don't monetize this site, it pays nothing; but, being more widely distributed would be nice. I seek to cause conversation, not agreement.
Let's talk about pensions, how you are played and how money is stolen from others because of you. That is a head scratcher isn't it. Here is an article, you have to read it to get the joke.
The Mercury News - U.S.-Mexico border wall fight: California considers divesting from companies involved in the project. The Mercury News is the newspaper for San Jose, a very liberal tech area. People in that area are really in favor of immigration, especially tech people, it keeps wages down. The article talks about how the state legislature wants to make a law telling the pension funds that they cannot invest in any company that helps build the wall between the United States and Canada.
While you ponder how you feel about the wall, you miss the point. While you ponder whether people should or should not buy stock in companies that you think should change their policies or who they contract with. While you ponder these things that are irrelevant, you miss the point. You miss the trick, start by knowing politicians are fraudsters and everything they say is for another reason, their priorities are not what you think, their priorities are them.
The pension fund in question is not owned by the state, it is owned by the people that have paid into the pension, the pensioners. The state does NOT own the pension, it is not their money. A pension is like a bank account, it is forced savings by you and for you in lieu of getting paid more money now. Politicians in California want to tell the pension fund where they can and cannot invest; but, are the willing to pay the pension fund if it loses money because of these investments? NO, they are not. Remember how we have been told every public pension in the country is bankrupt, they are not, now the politicians want to force investment decisions that might hurt the pensions even more with the state being responsible. If the state dictates how the pensions invest, the state takes on legal responsibility for the pensions wins and losses.
The game you are witnessing is not about border walls, it is not about Trump, it is about stealing pension money, directing where it goes and being paid for such help. I have not written about pensions in a while and some of my newer readers may not understand what I am talking about. For them, find the tag at the bottom of this post which says "pension fraud", if you click it you should see all the other posts about this subject. Basically, everything you believe about the state of public pensions is a lie, they are in a great place. I know that is hard to believe; but, remember the media lies to take care of corporate interests. Read the posts.
Pension are being robbed because that is where the money is in the eyes of Wall Street. Thieves do not rob Fort Know, they rob the local bank that is not as savvy or well protected. That is the reason the biggest crooks in the past 20 years are stealing from pensions and 401k's. Read the posts about Elliot Broidy and the CIM Group, read the posts and understand that all the politicians involved benefited from helping developers in their cities.
I have noticed that the new readers are focused on politics. the pension fraud threads are politics and money and propaganda.
I don't have a problem with public speaking, I am just not sure if I want my face on the internet. The truth is that blogging began dying out just as I started this blog. The chance of getting heard is greater on YouTube than it is on blogger. Two things I do not like about vlogging are the facts that it forces one to act faster and it's focus on images. I prefer the written word; but, if the words are not heard it does not matter and format determines distribution. I don't monetize this site, it pays nothing; but, being more widely distributed would be nice. I seek to cause conversation, not agreement.
Let's talk about pensions, how you are played and how money is stolen from others because of you. That is a head scratcher isn't it. Here is an article, you have to read it to get the joke.
The Mercury News - U.S.-Mexico border wall fight: California considers divesting from companies involved in the project. The Mercury News is the newspaper for San Jose, a very liberal tech area. People in that area are really in favor of immigration, especially tech people, it keeps wages down. The article talks about how the state legislature wants to make a law telling the pension funds that they cannot invest in any company that helps build the wall between the United States and Canada.
While you ponder how you feel about the wall, you miss the point. While you ponder whether people should or should not buy stock in companies that you think should change their policies or who they contract with. While you ponder these things that are irrelevant, you miss the point. You miss the trick, start by knowing politicians are fraudsters and everything they say is for another reason, their priorities are not what you think, their priorities are them.
The pension fund in question is not owned by the state, it is owned by the people that have paid into the pension, the pensioners. The state does NOT own the pension, it is not their money. A pension is like a bank account, it is forced savings by you and for you in lieu of getting paid more money now. Politicians in California want to tell the pension fund where they can and cannot invest; but, are the willing to pay the pension fund if it loses money because of these investments? NO, they are not. Remember how we have been told every public pension in the country is bankrupt, they are not, now the politicians want to force investment decisions that might hurt the pensions even more with the state being responsible. If the state dictates how the pensions invest, the state takes on legal responsibility for the pensions wins and losses.
The game you are witnessing is not about border walls, it is not about Trump, it is about stealing pension money, directing where it goes and being paid for such help. I have not written about pensions in a while and some of my newer readers may not understand what I am talking about. For them, find the tag at the bottom of this post which says "pension fraud", if you click it you should see all the other posts about this subject. Basically, everything you believe about the state of public pensions is a lie, they are in a great place. I know that is hard to believe; but, remember the media lies to take care of corporate interests. Read the posts.
Pension are being robbed because that is where the money is in the eyes of Wall Street. Thieves do not rob Fort Know, they rob the local bank that is not as savvy or well protected. That is the reason the biggest crooks in the past 20 years are stealing from pensions and 401k's. Read the posts about Elliot Broidy and the CIM Group, read the posts and understand that all the politicians involved benefited from helping developers in their cities.
I have noticed that the new readers are focused on politics. the pension fraud threads are politics and money and propaganda.
Sunday, March 19, 2017
I Have Passed 100,000 Hits
Blogs have come and gone; but, this one has the rare honor of having received over 100,000 hits. The first post may have received only 2 hits. Bloggers are not the thing anymore, now people post videos. I am considering doing the same and switching over to vlogging. If you have an opinion on the matter, let me know your thoughts. Thank you and be well.
Smart Objects and Dumb Politicians
MSN - In the future, devices will think for you. In the future we will see the "internet of things" where every object has it's own internet address. I told you about this years ago when the internet increased it's number of available individual IP addresses. Think about it this way, think about how everything you buy has an individual barcode. Well, now everything will be connected to the internet that has a barcode, so that it can be tracked and monitored, just like you are.
MSN - Pirelli's smart and stylish connected tires are here. Even your tires can tattletale on you now.
The Gazette - New technology, $10,000 reward aimed at finding Fort Carson soldier's killer from 1987. We can even tell what you look like from your DNA, past, present and future.
WND - Pat Buchanan - Is McCain hijacking Trump's foreign policy? To start with, I don't like the source of this article; but, I don't like the Washington Post either. Pat however was in government and was important in decision making so it is worth knowing what he has to say. The takeaway from this article is that John McCain called Rand Paul a Russian agent for disagreeing with him on a policy, you can find the video on YouTube. It seems the only response that politicians who have sold themselves out to the moneyed interests can do is call people Russian agents.
MSN - Pirelli's smart and stylish connected tires are here. Even your tires can tattletale on you now.
The Gazette - New technology, $10,000 reward aimed at finding Fort Carson soldier's killer from 1987. We can even tell what you look like from your DNA, past, present and future.
WND - Pat Buchanan - Is McCain hijacking Trump's foreign policy? To start with, I don't like the source of this article; but, I don't like the Washington Post either. Pat however was in government and was important in decision making so it is worth knowing what he has to say. The takeaway from this article is that John McCain called Rand Paul a Russian agent for disagreeing with him on a policy, you can find the video on YouTube. It seems the only response that politicians who have sold themselves out to the moneyed interests can do is call people Russian agents.
Saturday, March 18, 2017
Thank You Twitterer
This blog is now getting about 200 hits a day. Still small in the scheme of things; but, ten times as many as five years ago. After noticing the increase I began looking at traffic sources and it seems that someone linked to it on twitter. Now, I do not use twitter; but, obviously someone read something and linked to my blog that does. If anyone comes here from twitter, please direct me to the account that linked to me.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)