Why Europe Wanted Unfettered Migration.

Have you ever met wealthy people who feel they are superior to you? I have. I have seen the face of those who feel the world owes them. I knew a billionaire; but, he was not that way and neither was his family. Most self made people believe in meritocracy. The wealthy in England used to look down on new money, self made people. Self made people do not run this world.

We tax just about every form of income except one, inheritance. When we attempt to tax that it is referred to as a death tax. You cannot tax the dead, they are dead and own nothing. Why don't we tax inherited income as we tax earned income? We tax lottery winnings as income. Why? If I inherit money isn't it still income to me?

"Old money", people whose family have a history of running the world, feel entitled and look down on the rest of us. They send their children to special schools to learn how to manage the world and the rest of us. They don't learn the same things in school, not even the dumb ones.

I want you to see what young rich children learn, lets look at one of the schools they attend. Phillip's Academy, Andover.

Course of Study.

They can learn Latin, Chinese, Arabic, Russian or a bunch of others. They take classes in all of the arts. Read the course of study by clicking the link above. That is what their high schools are like. Do I have to explain what public high schools teach? The playing field has never been level and probably never will be. We make the situation even worse by not giving all children a free education equal to the education that those they compete with will have.

I had a friend in college, he was born to wealth. He lived in a penthouse in Boston and would piss away $25,000 on a weekend in Vegas in the 1980s. Very few people make it into grad school and most of them come from money because they can afford it and could afford to have gone to one of the better schools. I used to beat those people to a pulp academically; but, I have a over 155 IQ. All the education in the world cannot beat an idiot savant like me. Why shouldn't everyone get the same level of education? Because they don't want a fair race or meritocracy, they believe this is their world and we are parasites on it.

The non-populists elitists don't want a fair fight. They avoid a fair fight by keeping the vast majority ignorant and uneducated, only smart enough to read comics. Read that course of study, read the class outlines, read the whole darn thing to understand who your children are competing with. Imagine what the world would be like if all children were taught that well.

Imagine how kids that grew up with the superior education look at their contemporaries. I know how they look at us. In my first year of law school they didn't bother with me. After I got my first American Jurisprudence Award, they all wanted to be my friend and study partner. What none of them knew as that unlike everyone else, I was asked to apply to the school. I didn't seek them out, they sought me out. I didn't know the school until they invited me to attend. Did you know that we were not allowed to work the first year of law school? That was to keep out the poor. I lived on $25 a week and that included my cigarettes. This is not a meritocracy.

There is a term, it is offensive. House Nigger. A house nigger was a slave that didn't have to toil in the field, they ate better than the other slaves, they dressed better than the other slaves and were treated better. You had to treat them better because they could kill you with a knife as you slept because they were often your personal valet. Yet, they were still called niggers. I hope you find that offensive because I do and that is how old money looks at everyone else regardless of sex, race, color or sexual orientation or religion. We argue over which is worse, white, black, gay. straight, Muslim, Jew, whatever. They just question who is annoying them the most at the moment. I said it before, there are three guys on crosses, a Jew, a black and a white guy and they start arguing over who has it worse.

If you understood what I just wrote than maybe you can understand this. A document from the United Nations written in about 2000 has just come to light. It shows what I have written about for years, that the population curve n Europe is below sustainable levels. A nation or culture needs to have 2.11 children for every couple and we ain't making that in the west or Japan. We are not looking at overpopulation, we are looking at under population. We are looking at not having a replacement society in Europe.

If you wish to know why Europe is taking in so many "refugees", it is simple, they need people to replace their native populations that have chosen not to have children. If your slaves don't have children you buy new slaves. You move sheep by herding them. We don't even teach civics in school anymore. We don't teach the average person's kids how to manage societies.

Replacement Migration: Is It a Solution to Declining and Ageing Populations?

Yep, the United Nations was talking about the need for large numbers of people to migrate to Europe to replace their existing people in 2000. Were you told about that? Did you know that conversation was going on? What makes you think you live in a democracy, you live in an oligarchy.

Just some quick news

MSN - CNBC - This is your captain retiring...world faces pilot shortage. This article is a lie. We could easily train enough people to be pilots which is a good paying job.

CBS - Boeing To Test Self-Flying Planes.  It is cheaper to build self flying planes.

VICE - The Mayor Who Loved China. This is the same mayor who wants to build a 10 story tall Buddha in the middle of the Mojave desert.

I Will Write Again

Sorry guys but I haven't seen anything worth writing about. I have however watched some really interesting YouTube videos and thought I might post one of them.

Hypocrites and Donald Trump Jr.

So the new line of garbage is that Donald Trump Jr. met with a Russian and that the Russian offered to give information about how Hillary was getting money from Russians or some such garbage. Well, Hillary did get money from Russian bankers, they paid Bill a half million dollars to give in speech in Russia after she approved the deal where 20% of U.S, Uranium is now owned by Russia. The Huffington Post posted this.

Huffington Post - Exactly Why Donald Trump Jr.’s Meeting With A Russian Lawyer Could Be Illegal.

The article claims that it is illegal for anyone to get anything from a foreigner that might be useful to a candidate. It claims that a Russian offered Donald Trump Jr information about Hillary and that could be a crime. Lets break this down. Firstly, they misstate the law, information is not a brief. The law is about money or promises of money or something else of similar nature. Secondly, you can refuse to take money but not hear someone. Thirdly, there is no claim that Donald Jr used anything was told, in fact, the campaign for his father never claimed Hillary was doing what the Russian who spoke to Donald Jr claimed she was. Finally, and the real point of this post, the DNC hired an English ex spy to write a dossier to hurt Trump, you know the one that claimed Trump had prostitutes piss on a bed that the Obamas had slept in. That is the hypocritical part.

CNN and Abuse of Power

"CNN is not publishing “HanA**holeSolo’s” name because he is a private citizen who has issued an extensive statement of apology, showed his remorse by saying he has taken down all his offending posts, and because he said he is not going to repeat this ugly behavior on social media again. In addition, he said his statement could serve as an example to others not to do the same."

"CNN reserves the right to publish his identity should any of that change."

Someone of Reddit modified a video of Trump at a wrestling match smacking the owner of the wrestling channel and put "CNN" over Vince McMahan's face. Trump retweeted it and hilarity ensued as the corporate media flipped out and claimed it could endanger reporters lives. CNN tracked down the person who made the video and he apologized. CNN said he sounded nervous. CNN then discussed exposing his identity to the world and the quote from above is what CNN wrote and posted.

CNN and the others in corporate media do not understand social media, they are only compounding their arrogance and lies for all to see. It is funny that the corporate media decries attacks on free speech while at the same time threatening and attacking people for exercising free speech on social media. If what CNN did was meant to threaten others, it backfired and the anti-CNN memes are now flowing at lightening speed. They may not like it; but, the corporate media no longer controls the narrative.

Trump, CNN and a Wrestling Video

Someone on Reddit made the video above and President Trump posted a copy of it on Twitter. The corporate media's response was to say that Trump is calling for violence on reporters. Wait, this is the same media that called for Trump's impeachment prior to the election actually being held. This is the same media that defended Kathy Griffin showing Trump's decapitated head as a bad joke. This is the same media that said the voters were stupid and the same media that supported a play about Ceaser which ends with Trump being stabbed to death. Nobody cares what the media thinks anymore.

This is how the media reacted to Trump's winning the presidency. Why would we expect them to ever be honest or reasonable about Trump.

Here is the bottom line issue. If you continually attack someone, expect them to respond. Pretty simple. Between May and June the mainstream corporate media spent 353 minutes attacking Trump for a false Russia collusion claim that they have zero evidence of. This same media spent only 1 minute discussing tax reform, 3 minutes discussing infrastructure, 5 minutes discussing the economy and jobs and 17 minutes discussing healthcare. We have all seen Trump be attacked for just stupid stuff like how many scoops of ice cream he has at dinner or that he likes his steaks well done and the media is offended that he fights back and expects you to be upset by it too. Look at the comments online, real people are not upset, real people think it is hilarious.

Not Writing, Just Thinking

Sorry kids, the Pimpernel hasn't felt something worthy of writing about for a few days. I will say this much, I am still thinking about making YouTube videos. I feel more people might hear what I have to say and feel I don't get enough comments here. I spoke to my brother about that tonight. He said that he didn't think my blog seemed to invite comments. He seems to believe that my posts don't really ask questions; but, rather answer them. I don't know what I think about that.

I guess it is like when I was preaching. If someone had asked me why they should believe in God, I would have told them that I don't care what you believe in. It is not my job to tell you what to believe in, it is my job to tell you what I believe in. I want you to think about that for a second.

I write to tell others what I see. I am totally fine with people not seeing the same thing and ignoring me or even questioning me. It is not my job to convince anyone of anything, the bible says that we should have an answer for the hope that lies within us. I have answer for why I believe what I believe.

I don't make money from this and have decided if I would monetize a YouTube video, if I choose to make them; but, I am not monetizing this blog and never have. I have written thousands of posts for almost a decade and have never made a penny. I deeply feel for the Daniels family; but, I have made it very clear I never thought they would ever read my stuff and did not write about the case for any personal reason, I just thought there was too many garbage answers being given. I absolutely wish someone with more attention and viewership would talk about the case. I actually reached out to a YouTuber, who has many more views than I, about the case, someone that talks about such things and asked them to do a video about the case. They have not and did not respond to me, I will not mention who it was.

I want to know my readers opinions. Should I start doing YouTube videos? I would have more viewers; but, would video of me talking about these things detract from the written word? Would the people that read my writing like to hear my voice, I won't show my face, I'm just not that pretty. I have been told that I write the way I sound in person. I can't judge that. You decide. NO, you give your opinion, I decide what I do. Peace and thanks for caring enough to keep reading my nonsense.