Thursday, October 4, 2012

You want to use your phone as your identification

So a few months ago I read this article about some woman in New York who wanted to use her phones picture of her license to prove that she was old enough to drink. Basically, she was thought a picture of her drivers license on her phone should allow her to buy drinks at some bar. At the time I thought it was suspicious because it made the international news. I may or may not have written on it at the time. In either case I saw this article today and it all sort of made sense.

The Independent - National 'virtual ID card' scheme set for launch (Is there anything that could possibly go wrong?

Now for the first time since I have begun this blog I am going to use rough language, "Read the fxxking link, read the article. It is about what is coming into your life, what you will be required to do and how you will be tracked." I hope I put sufficient emphasis on the issue.

Here is what is going on. England is about to authorize social media sites to authenticate who you are for governmental and banking transactions. Here is a line from the article, "Indeed, it is hoped the Identity Assurance Programme, which is being led by the Cabinet Office, will mean the end to any prospect of a physical national ID card being introduced in the UK." Do you understand the little word game that they are playing? They are saying that there will not be a "PHYSICAL" national id, no, there will not, it will be a virtual national identification system. Adding the word physical does not change it from being an international id.

I have written on how you are going to use your biometrics as your international verification of your international IP (internet presence). It really isn't that complicated, if something is illegal for the government to do, they create private companies to do the same thing and you agree to go along with it because it is convenient. Do you really believe that the government cannot check all of your purchases on your "Rewards Card", heck, they have the right to tap your cell phone without a warrant.

IN the future you will not need a wallet, nor cash, nor identification, it will all be virtual and carried on your phone. After that, it will be enough just to have your face. Things are moving very swiftly, quicker than I anticipated. My hope is that none of my readers ask me when it has all gone down, why I didn't say anything because I did. I do not speak of FEMA camps or nonsense, I speak the truth and provide links. It only helps you if your read the links, not my words, I try and use "reputable" sources. I only analyze what they say, commentary with no monetary, emotional or other reimbursement.

I read the comments on the "debates", they were a joke. All they wanted to discuss was who won, not what their plan was to make things better. I personally do not care who is a better speaker, Romney or Obama, they are both liars. If the choice is between a socialist and a fascist, why vote? Who cares who wins, we lose. I do not care about personalities, I care about policies.

You cannot have a "nation" without being able to identify who is part of it. Think the Arizona law on immigration, totally wrong because it ignored the idea of probable cause. The people in Arizona want proof that hispanics are from their state. They are attempting to trade their freedom (probable cause) to prove identity (national identification). Why trade? Why can't we have both a freedom and a restriction on government?

Both Obama and Romney are asking you the same question, which type of tyranny do you wish. It is like asking if you stopped beating your wife, both answers are wrong. The true answer is that you never did and you never will. Have a great weekend and try not listening to the spin of the news.

Wednesday, October 3, 2012

Perhaps I had a thought

My ex-wife and others have been taking up all my thoughts. I apologize for not having posted more. I went to many alternative news sites to find something; but, interesting to write about and found nothing. The "debate" was not worthy of discussion, at least it wasn't to the mainstream media, they were more worried about who "won" than anything that the candidates had to say. The "debates" are as meaningless as anything. Here are my question for all candidates:

1. Will you get us out of the wars and when? I want dates that are within a year of your being elected.

2. Will you reverse the Patriot Act, the NDAA and ALL executive orders that have not been approved by congress?

3. Will you agree that we all benefit equally from the nation we have created, will you agree to being taxed equally, all income regardless of source at a percentage with no deductions? Can we all contribute as we receive?

4. Torture is wrong and we will never engage in it. Let us ensure that our military is the highest of our morals and not the worst of us.

5. We will support people making their own decisions rather than dictating morality.

Lets start with those rather than who seemed more Presidential, lets focus on what they will do rather than hope, faith or other forms of stupidity that are not backed up by the truth.

Monday, October 1, 2012

Sex Talk with Your Kids - Careful what you say in California

Now personally I really don't care if someone is gay, it is none of my business. I have gay friends and it just isn't an issue for me. If one of my kids told me they were gay when they were younger, I would have talked to them about it and stated that I believe that we are two sexes for a reason, we are meant to be with members of the opposite sex. I would give them my honest opinion.

A couple of weeks ago a very rich man in Asia offered about $60 million for someone to marry his daughter. His daughter is gay and very accomplished. I saw her interviewed, she said she knew he did it out of love. She was much more generous than I would have been. I think what he did was immoral, disrespectful and wrong. By the way, she was also cute. We won't even get into how many idiots wanted to take him up on the offer. What sort of moron would even begin to think he had a chance?

So, now we come to the news. California has passed a law prohibiting people from taking their children to “sexual orientation change efforts.” Really? Now, my readers know that there must be more to this and there is. But, first I want to say something about my regular readers. You don't come here for the news, you come here because you know the news is just propaganda. I may not have a lot of readers; but, I don't have any dumb ones that visit regularly. Neither the issues or my take on them is for morons, it requires going into the stories.

Quite awhile back I wrote about a lesbian couple in California. They were portrayed in the mainstream media as evil because their adopted son said he was a girl. Everyone was told how he was getting hormone treatments and it sounded as if they were trying to pressure him into being a girl; but, the truth was a little different. In fact, they were giving him treatments to delay the onset of puberty and did not know how to deal with him. He told them he was a girl and they told him that he was not. They gave him treatments to delay puberty so that he would understand better that he was a boy. I disagree with them, let him have puberty when his body says so; but, I know what they did was out of love and they were in a tough spot, they tried to be good parents. I say being a parent means that you can never be right again.

I guess under this new law, those lesbians would be in trouble for trying to be good parents. We have two choices, sexuality is either a decision or genetics. If it is genetic than would it be okay to find the gay gene and refuse to have a child born that had it? We can have all the abortions we want, no reason is needed. Now, if homosexuality is a choice, why can't we discuss it with our kids and have help from trained professionals?

I have a friend and she has the most marvelous son, he is just amazing. He had a very, very, very rare disorder. I am so glad that I got to meet him, he just made me smile and laugh and feel affection for him and his girl friend. He was not supposed to live like past 10; but, he is much older than that.

A side note, how much money has been spent trying to find the "gay" gene and how much has been spent trying to decode autism? I can tell you right now that more effort has been spent to eradicate autism than homosexuality. To my autistic brothers and sisters, we are hated more than gays. In California it is now illegal to attempt to influence someones gender identification; however, it is legal to have you unborn child's dna scanned to see if they might be autistic so that you can kill us before we are born.

Not long ago some people attempted to get a law passed that prohibited people from having abortions in order to determine the sex of the baby. You can kill a baby for any reason apparently. The law was not passed. Here is the question, if we could determine if our child was going to be gay, it would be legal to have an abortion of that child. You can kill them before they are born; but, once born you are not supposed to try influence their decisions.

We did not outlaw telling your children that homosexuality was wrong, we did not outlaw telling your children that being gay is a sin, we did not outlaw mentally abusing children and we couldn't define it well enough to prevent it. I know many gay people and tell them I love them, because their parents did not. You cannot outlaw that, you cannot enforce love.

What we have is a stupid law. We have a law that tells parents they cannot have professionals help them if they believe their children are headed down the wrong road. That is what this law establishes, it is called precedent in the courts. The law is not about homosexuality, it is about government control over what parents try and teach their children.

Not a thought in my pretty little head

I got nothing. I don't have any news to tell that is meaningful.

Friday, September 28, 2012

An International Tax on Smoking

Sorry; but, still under the weather. I post this article that should amuse you.

The Washington Free Beacon - Taxes Without Borders

Once you accept an international tax, you accept it on everything. Many will applaud this as being good for the world; but, it is just picking an unpopular group to bring in international taxes.

On a side not, here is a great article from St Louis. CBS - St Louis - Virtual House Arrest Ordered for Minors in East St. Louis

Who says that we cannot make everyone a prisoner?

Wednesday, September 26, 2012

Okay not all better; but, better

The Pimpernel is better and is drinking fluids and eating soup. I actually took a day off to heal, not as young as I was. I slept a lot and tried to read the news. I read where Romney said that he wanted to get rid of some deductions; but, he didn't say which ones. I know which ones, the middle class ones and the one for homeowners. It is already being discussed. Romney's plan is to get rid of deductions for the middle class and keep them for the wealthy.

Richard Nixon was a working class guy, he did some bad things, things that other Presidents had done; but, still wrong. He also proposed a flat tax, 20% or so across the board on income. It is the simplest tax in the world. He also got us off of the gold standard and that was a good thing. There used to be a joke, the golden rule that the person who had the gold made the rules. What is gold, it is simply a metal that has limited uses beyond jewelry.

The moment you buy into gold, you buy into being used. You make a useless metal your God and you can be bought. I would rather have a sandwich than gold. I can live without gold, I cannot live without food. It is said that in heaven the streets are paved with gold, it is that meaningless and would make for lousy streets.

Still kind of out of it in my head. Sorry the post is not better. I did have a point; but, I lost it. Have a great night.

Pimpernel is all better

Just woke up it is 12:00 in the morning. The fever has broken and I slept a lot, lol. I wont say I am normal because I don't know what normal is. I am kind of fuzzy; but, not sweaty and freezy. My dreams were odd and confused. I actually don't hate fevers, just the being cold or hot, the dream part is okay.

I am not fully awake and not asleep. I am still in that in between space, my mind is not oppressed by the world yet, merely confused by it and having it's own thoughts. I have emotional memories, memories of things that mattered to me at the time, things that have passed and people that have moved on. I shall drink lots of water tomorrow.

I had a dream once, I dreamed that I was in an amusement park and it was my home. The little cart went round and round and fell out and tried to get back on. Nonsense; but, emotional to me at the time. Dreams are an escape from the harshness of here, heaven is much better than either. I will not remember this post tomorrow, don't ask me about it, merely ramblings because I slept too much and have not awoken yet.

Is there such a thing as sleep writing? My nose keeps running; but, I keep toilet paper near me. I don't think I am all better; but, better enough to go in tomorrow. I don't want to lay in bed for another day. I think as we age we have less energy; but, we still think we can do the same things, muscle memory or something like it.

Shout outs to two women in the north, my Robbie and another. LOL. I might just have to go north again next year. I will play a song and go back to my fevered sleep, rofl.

YouTube - Dido - Thank You

Completely out of it, back to bed.