Russian Spies and Presidential Lies

After ten years the FBI arrested 10 Russian spies. The Russians claimed that Obama did not have control over his police. The arrests occurred two days after Obama had hamburgers with the Russian President and claimed that our relationship was "reset" (watch for the phrase in the news). Now only days later the United States is preparing for a exchange of spies with Russia. Something is not quite right.

Historically we have traded spies with the Russians. The spy business is just that, a business. We spy on them, they spy on us. Every nation has spies. Spies are usually quite professional and they understand each other. They trade information. After the fall of the Soviet Union many of their spies moved here and even became friends with their old opponents.

The thing of it is, you don't trade spies until after you have put on the show. You make grand statements about how the other side is spying on you, you whip up public opinion, you have a lengthy trial showing all the things the spies did and then jail them is a very secure place. You put in a lot of effort to get them to tell you who they worked with. That is the nature of the game.

This time things are different. Something smells. One of the spies immediately admitted to being a spy. Spies don't do that without a reason. The Obama administration has said NOTHING about the spies and now is looking to immediately trade them. One of the people we are trading him for is a Russian who is claimed to have been a spy and doesn't wish to leave Russia.

The FBI wants to arrest spies and the President wants to get them out of here as quick as possible. That is very questionable. But, lets remember that the timing of the arrests was also political. Someone wants us to see something. Can you see it?

Also go back and read the American newspaper reports. They talk about how Anna Chapman seems to have been put in the industry by her father, how she was soooo pretty, how the children of the spies will suffer and flood us with pictures of only Anna Chapman looking young, urban and pretty. One London paper even posted a picture of Ms. Chapman naked, her husband had taken the picture. She is the daughter of retired (you cannot retire) KGB official. By the way, spies usually run in families, it is safer.

The papers have also been reporting how most of the things the spies told their handlers could have easily been obtained off the internet. That is complete and utter nonsense. Why has the media intentionally downplayed this even and played up on sympathies in favor of the spies? The media talks about how we had an exchange with Francis Gary Powers and that it is nothing new, Powers spent two years in a Russian prison, not two weeks.

The article linked to Anna Chapman at the top of this post is just too amusing. It talks about how she had scoliosis as a kid, how her es-husband thought she was a loving and intelligent girl. It is all about how she was so nifty as a person. It sure sounds like garbage to me. Once arrested these spies were put under someone's control (the FBI does not hold prisoners as a rule - they don't run jails). Now, common practice is that the prisoners would have been put in the hands of the United States Marshal Service. That is protocol. If they were put in any other organizations hands, lets say the CIA or NSA or Homeland Security, then a breach of protocol has occurred. One that should make you ask questions.

If these spies are traded without a full trial bringing out all that was done, then friends we have a problem in the White House. If these spies were collecting such harmless information then it is all the more reason to not just let them go. If they are that unimportant to Russia then the Russians have no reason to let go of our spies. It is a game you see. Francis Gary Powers was very important to us, we traded him for a Russian Colonel and another person. It is a ratio and value thing.

Another point. Anna Chapman had also spied in England, how come the English aren't asking for her? She had even associated with the Royal family. This girl got in doors that not many do, how did she get such access?

One more thing. An eleventh spy was caught in Greece (lol), somehow he managed to get bail and escape. One of the spies we arrested was going to be given bail and a home detection bracelet just like Linsey Lohan. WTF? These are spies, you don't put them on home detection footwear.

I want you to go to the following link and watch the video. ABC report. Do they not act as if this is all one big joke? Her friends said she was just a party girl. IF THESE PEOPLE WERE NOT SPIES THE RUSSIANS WOULDN'T TRADE FOR THEM. One of them was trying to recruit and ex-military man who runs a website that predicts how people will act for advertisers.

I have added to this post five times now. I just keep reading more blatent baloney. The latest is an article from England where her ex-father in law and mother-in-law talk about how she was so naive and unsophisticated. Wait a second, her IQ was 162 and she is the daughter of a KGB agent, she was not unsophisticated. She also managed to mingle with Saudi princes, the royals and the jet set in New York. This is after her ex-husband, the son of the people saying how sweet she was, talked about how secretive and intelligent she was.

Now I will tell you a little secret that should be obvious. Every Russian diplomat and known agent is profiles and indexed and investigated by our government and the Russians do the same about ours. Both the English and the Americans knew this was the daughter of a KGB agent. I promise. They knew it before she arrived in our countries, these people are flagged on lists.

One of the things you do is attempt to compromise their people if their children commit certain acts. It is called leverage. Now, you cannot compromise the children intentionally, it must be their getting themselves in trouble. This may sound strange; but, non-players are not gone after. If you do then your non-players are at risk. It is not the mafia, it is the spy game, it is a profession of honor and risk.

Only the best play in the field. Most intelligence operatives are researchers working out of an office. They analyze the information more than they collect information. I cannot remember the numbers; but, fewer than 10% of intelligence operatives work in the field. To be a field operative means that you give up your life, you live for years in foreign countries, lie about who you are to everyone and are willing to die or kill to complete your mission. Naive and loving, neither applies.

True spies have no true self, they are playing a role and living in their heads. Anna's IQ was 162 and they keep talking about how she was pretty and naive. Give me a big darn break. She went into the family business for a reason, she fit it. She was the most dangerous type of operative, capable of living a complete lie to achieve a goal for her state, to give up her own life.

Remember, Miss Anna Chapman was the daughter of a spy and was given an award in college for writing about the great soviet union. She talked to friends in Russia about how she hated Americans. I am not going to provide links to all the articles, run her name in Yahoo under the section for news. She had a IQ of 162 and ran with the jet set. Oh, her ex said how she liked to hold a whip before sex and use sex toys. Poor, innocent, naive, manipulated girl. Baloney.

What do you think intelligence operatives teach their children, to be naive? They are taught to shoot, how to use a weapon, how to observe a situation, how to read the news, how to control a situation, how to manage themselves with complete dispassion. Most importantly, they are taught immediately not to talk about the industry. The first rule of fight club is that you don't talk about fight club. It has to be that way.

If you are a spy and have a four year old you must teach them from day one not to talk about what you do. Kids talk, they have to know what they cannot discuss. You cannot just be the child of a spy or intelligence officer. You teach your children that every phone call is tapped, you have to, they may be. This girl was the daughter of a spy, knew what it meant and became one. How dare they imply she was naive, that is propaganda from our own media. It is a lie.