Random Attrocities

Daily Mail - Don't call them robots! Europe's mechanical workers could become 'electronic persons' under controversial draft plan.  Let's see, robots to have rights and people to lose rights.

YouTube - BBC News - Overpopulation: Will we run out of space? BBC News.  So England is saying they are becoming overpopulated; but, they are also promoting open borders and an increase in immigration, is that logical?

Politico - Full transcript: Donald Trump's jobs plan speech.  I have to say that he gave an impressive speech. He talked about globalism's grim effect on America.

Foreign Policy - It's Time for the Elites to Rise Up Against the Ignorant Masses.  Search the title of the article and you will be able to read it once. It is a subscription site. The basic message is that the only opinions that matter are those of your betters.

Politico - Canada to drop Mexican visa restrictions.  Immediately after Britian voted out of the EU, the EU began discussing becoming it's own antion. Oddly enough at the same time, Canada and Mexico and the United States met to discuss the exact same thing and Canada decided to declare open borders with Mexico.

Why Support an Establishment That Believes You Don't Matter?

When white people (I am white) tell me how there is little to no racism anymore, I remind them that in my lifetime blacks had a very hard time voting in America. Kids, I remember the 1960s. I remember John Kennedy being president and Martin Luther King while they were alive. I remember when you had deeds that prohibited you from selling your house to blacks or Asians in the nicer areas. I also witnessed the changes as homosexuality and interracial marriage stopped being crimes. In many states it was even illegal to engage in oral sex with your wife.

This post is not about gays or blacks, it is about democracy and voting being representative. Remember what the founding fathers did say, "Taxation without representation is tyranny". Yet, when they said that women could not vote and blacks could not vote, nor Indians. The people in charge always want to limit voting and democracy to their group.

Well, I have some articles for you so that you can understand this issue better. Lets start with this.

The establishment is scared and the vote bye the UK to leave the European Union has terrified them because it means others might choose self determination and ignore them Now England left the European Union because they lost the ability to write and legislate their own laws, the European Union's response was to immediately call for less democracy and less control over the internal laws by EU nations.

The Express - European SUPERSTATE to be unveiled: EU nations 'to be morphed into one' post-Brexit.  The intent is simple, change the rules of the game before more people vote themselves out of the EU. They do not want you to believe that your vote should matter.

Breitbart - Media Pushes ‘Ban’ On Old People Voting After Brexit.  Yes, both American and British media are saying that baby boomers (older people) should not be allowed to vote, what a shock. Read the links that were provided by Breitbart.

Foreign Policy - It's Time for the Elites to Rise Up Against the Ignorant Masses. You have to searth the phrase and you only get to read the article once before the site locks you out. Didn't know that when I read it.

Yahoo - American politics has been ‘reformed to death’.  The article's basic proposition is that we have enough democracy and that the primaries allow too much of the average American having a say in the government. This is a really important article that once again explains the establishments contempt for the average person having a say in their own life.

Forbes - Of Course U.S. Inequality Is Rising, It Was Meant To.  How nice of Forbes to point out why the middle class should die off and become poorer.

Brexit and Media Propaganda About the Outcome.

I have been writing about Nigel Farage and the wish of many to leave the European Union for a couple of years. Long before Trump ran for President of Americans had even heard of Farage or Brexit. All my posts are time stamped by blogspot and I cannot change the time stamps. Well, Britain voted to leave the European Union on Thursday and the media is all united in saying that the voters were idiots and really didn't want to leave the EU. Why?

This post is not about the Brexit, like many of my posts it is about propaganda and corporate controlled media lies. While the majority of Britain's voted to leave the EU, I cannot find one late night show host who has not insulted them for doing so. Whether Britain had voted to stay or leave the EU I would not have called them idiots. People should vote their conscience not what they are told unless you have a representative government as we are told we have.  Why is it that not one of the late night hosts has congratulated the British on their decision? Could it be because the six companies that own 90%+ of all the mass media are globalists?

Right now, if you follow the news, you will be able to watch the media use the exact same propaganda for globalism that will be used if Trump wins, trust me, it is the exact same storyline.

Here a couple of really simple questions. If Brexit was going to cause the end of the world then why didn't the American media disuses it more prior to the vote? Now here is a really important question that is hard to grasp at first. If California is more important to the world than England's economy (which it is), then why didn't the markets fail more when we experienced riots, drought, earthquakes, floods and everything else you can imagine in the same year? You see, Britain's effect on the world wide economy is minimal compared to China or the United States or even just California.

Britains vote to leave the EU will have zero effect for the next two years because that is how long it will take to cease living under EU regulations, if they choose not to follow them. Britain does not produce much anymore, Jaguars will continue to be sold in Europe and America and China, their vote to leave the EU will not effect how many products they sell overseas or how many Chinese televisions they but, this has no long term. real economic effect, the market volatility was going to happen anyways, as I had previously written about prior to the vote, and is only meant to punish the British for not being total globalists willing to give up their choice over their laws.

Something Is Bothering Me

Okay, this is not a political or scientific post, it is merely a personal post. Something is bothering me. I know I said that I recently got kicked out of my apartment by the new owners, everyone in the building was kicked out, 60 days notice the day escrow cleared. LOL. I was gone in 33 days and bought a place, something I never wanted to do again but am happy with now. I don't have to care for the outside, just my space.

Well, the owners of the building I lived in want to cheat me in a small way. Mind you there was no rent control where I lived, they can do what they want; but, they want to keep more of my security deposit than is right. Here I the truth the new owners said and did things that I could really make cost them a lot of money. They even broke some postal laws by removing the mailboxes.

It doesn't really matter how many things I could charge them for or how stupid they have been, it is meaningless to me on a level. Let's say that they could try and cheat me out of $250, how much effort of mine is that worth and how much pain would be right to inflict on them unless they give it all back? One of the nicest people I know in the world told me I should rip their throats out. I believe she was being protective of me and I appreciate that; but, I can ignore a lot of things anymore and do not seek fights.

Let us just assume that for very little money and less effort I could cost them ten thousand to me and whatever attorney's fees would be involved over a $250 disagreement. Is that really worth it? They will never read this blog and have even violated the laws in California over when you must give back last months rent and security deposit.

Kids, look, the Pimpernel is more than capable of taking care of bad guys. If I explain to them everything they have messed up, they won't stop being them, they will only learn new tricks. I can afford to take a loss, their next loss will be worse than what I would do, they will make the same mistakes again; but, against someone who actually cares.

What is bothering me is not the few hundred dollars at stake, it is my friends thinking I am not protecting myself. I am protecting myself as is needed and rational. Don't fight because you are in the right or because you can win, fight because your opponent will learn something or others will, fight when it makes things better. Peace.

Britain Has Left the E.U.

Well, start by reading my previous post and the others I wrote about Brexit. Britain has left the European Union and is it's own nation again. Don't think this is over, it is not. It will take Britain two years to finalize their leaving. Expect a second vote in that time.

Here is what you can expect. Britain will see great losses in their stock market and their currency lose trading value. Prime Minster David Cameron will negotiate Britain's exit by promising to follow all E.U. rules so that it can have a free trade agreement with the E.U.  In other words. he will negotiate an exit with no change in the status quo.

I guess my professor and I were right 36 years ago.

Brexit Was Discussed 36 Years Ago

As always, you get a little bit of this and a little bit of that here. Right now, as I am writing this, people in the United Kingdom are voting on whether or not they should remain in the European Union. I think it is in there best interest to leave; but, it is a decision that should be left to them. The funny thing is that this question was raised to me 36 years ago while in college.

I attended a university in Boston to get my Bachelor's degree, I lived in the state at the time. My professor for international affairs was also an advisor to the Soviet Union and Ireland. He advised me to get my doctorate in Political Science and become the world's expert on politics in Polynesia. He said that would be a perfect niche for me because I knew so much about it at the timey and he couldn't think of anyone who was the expert in it. Polynesia tended to be more of an interest to anthropologists (who lied about it). I appreciated his concern and kind direction. In fact, all of my professors wanted me to become a professor of political science; but, I wanted to write laws, so I went to law school instead.

There is an answer to the question of what we do with people whose physical efforts are not needed in Polynesia. As long as they could be provided for, they were kept around and given new jobs with dignity even if it was playing with the children. There answer changed when there wasn't enough for the tribe to survive. The funny thing about the Polynesians, they viewed all their tribe as relatives. A very Christian thing to do.

Anyways, that professor predicted that the world would turn to regionalism and that nations would bind together based on the region they were in. He was right and that is what the European Union is and what he predicted would happen. It also exactly matches how he saw NAFTA or our region. There was a question he did not answer, which way England would go, with Europe or North America and Australia. I bet that England would unite with North America, New Zealand and Australia. Tomorrow we will know if I was right and if he was right, because we both thought England would be part of America's region.

UPDATE:

Well, as I woke up and read the news it turned out that England voted to remain in the European Union. In a very narrow vote England voted away their right to self determination.

UPDATE 2:

Well, the update is not correct. When I got up I went and looked at the headlines and it said that Farage had conceded defeat, turns out that was a lie the English media put out. In fact, Farage said that he knew it was close and the vote might be for remain; but, he specifically said he was not conceding loss. Turns out that there are NO official polls on the vote and as I write this the leave vote is leading by a slight margin. The vote is in the air and we will not know the outcome for hours. I will update.

Brexit and U.S. Media Propaganda

There is a show on HBO with a man named John Oliver called "Last Week Tonight". It plays on Sundays late at night and then posts clips. They posted one tonight about the "Brexit" and I wrote about this issue weeks ago. Mr. Oliver is English and not known in his home country; but, he is very funny.

Here is the essence of the issue and Brexit. England joined a trading union, a free trade agreement with other European countries after World War II. It is that simple. Well, later unelected people who worked in the European Union decided to make more rules and eventually the free trade agreement became a political union, one in which the European Union wrote most of the laws for all the EU nations, the only problem was that the people never got to vote on it. Because of this, the presence of  England in this political union was undemocratic. The second problem is that no matter who you vote for, it cannot determine what your EU representatives vote on, like half of their laws. All the things Americans have feared about the United Nations is being done in Europe by the EU. A small group of non-elected people deciding the laws that everyone must live by, the description of an oligarchy.

Well, the people of Britain have decided that they want to vote on the matter of whether or not they remain in the European Union and that happens this week. The essence of nationhood is the ability to protect your group from others. In fact, Libertarians would say that is the only duty of government. The constitution says that one of the fundamental rights of the people is to assemble, to choose with whom you live. Up until the late 1960's there were many deed for property in America that said who and who you could not sell to. Many said that you could not sell to blacks or Asians. Those deeds were voided by the courts who said that you cannot require others to limit their right to sell to whoever they wanted once you sold your property to them.

Let me try and simplify my description of the issue. Should someone be able to legally determine what everyone else born in history is and is not allowed to do? Should anyone ever be born with no chance to make a difference in their life's outcome, should their be no place for merit? If todays people can sell their children's future opportunities then you sell your offspring into slavery. You cannot sell what you do not own and you cannot own others; therefore, you cannot deny people in the future to decide what the law should be for themselves. That is what Brexit is about.

The Precariat and Your Future

Recently I was reading about the Bilderburg Group's meeting this year and I ended up going too their website to verify something. I was reading their agenda for this years meeting and it mentioned the precariat and the middle class. The Bidlerberg Group - Press Release - Bilderberg Meetings.  That link go right to their website, the Precariat and the Middle Class is item 9 on their agenda. The agenda itself is very vague and predictable, they will discuss Trump and the Brexit; but, also other things, most of which are too vaguely listed. Yet, the word precariat was new to me so I looked it up.

Wikipedia - The Precariat.

The precariat are the people who we do not have jobs for and because of that they are useless to society as a whole in any material manner. While you may have an emotional response to that issue, it is the truth that we no longer need as many people because machines and computers can replace manual laborers and not everybody is smart enough to be a brain surgeon.

I have been writing about this for years; but, now the establishment is openly discussing the issue. Apparently the term was first used in 2014 in a book titled "Precariat, The New Dangerous Class".  You see, the machines are coming and the establishment is asking the question of what is to be done with those who cannot contribute, those who cannot outperform the machines.

The real question of this earth is quite simple and the people in charge know the question, should the rest of us at least ask it of ourselves?  God said "Go forth and procreate".  We have and he never said there would be to many of us and there is not, there are enough of us where all could live quite well; but, we don't need everyone to give back. We no longer need manual labor, we don't need the most basic workers anymore or at least very few of them. We won't even need trashmen, that can be automated.

Remember this, we need very few painters, movie makers, writers, singers, or CEOs. What do we do with those who we do not need and how many of those who do not contribute do we wish to take care of?

If not today then by tomorrow you will be the precariat and if not you, your children. Be well.

Random Stuff and Propaganda

MSN - Judd Apatow: ‘Ghostbusters’ Haters Are Donald Trump Supporters.  So, there is a reboot (remake with slight differences) of the film and cartoon series "Ghostbusters" and all the heroes and main characters are female replacing the original cast that included Dan Akroyd and Bill Murray. Well, some people think it is a bad idea and won't be funny. There are those who believe that it is being done to make a statement rather than be funny. I don't really care why it is being done. Well, the producer of the film is claiming that the people questioning his choice are probably Trump supporters. Wow, take responsibility for your choices and accept the fact that people vote with their dollars and if the film fails it is because it is not good enough. Trump has never held elected office, neither wrote nor passed any of our laws, has no interest in the new Ghostbusters movie and is not responsible for everything that has gone on wrong. The sort of demonization that I see can only be describes as propaganda and that we should study.

Mohammed Ali

I was a big boxing fan and grew up during the Ali period, he dominated the sport for years and changed it. He was a great man and a flawed man; but, one of the greatest in the history of boxing.

The Orlando Mass Murder

I want to begin with two things that have saddened me. First and foremost I want to express my sincere concern over the people who were killed at a gay club in Orlando by a Muslim terrorist. I am disgusted by how the mass media is playing out the story by either blaming Obama (Fox) or blaming Trump (Hillary Clinton). I understand politics and I understand that politicians and the media are opportunists who attempt to push their propaganda whenever something happens. I personally attempt to wait a few days after something like this before I comment out of respect and in order to think rather than react.

Neither Trump nor Obama are responsible for what happened in Orlando. The shooter is responsible. The truth is that non-Muslims have done mass shootings in the United States and there has been bombings in the United States by people who claim to be Christian. Let's face facts, sick people do sick things. Not everyone is allowed to drive a car, you need a license. In fact, after serving their sentence felons are allowed to drive; but, not buy a gun. We do restrict who can own guns. We also restrict which weapons people can own, you cannot own an atomic bomb or a ballistic missile and need special licensing to own explosives like dynamite.

Here is something interesting, Donald Trump said maybe we should think about keeping people on terrorist watch lists from owning guns. Even after that, he was attacked on the left and right, by gun right activists and by anti-gun people. Neither side wants rationality or common sense, they fight for all or nothing and we get more mass shootings. More people have been killed by assault rifles in the last five years than deer.

Back in the Saddle

My apologies for not writing sooner, I moved. I only today found my computer and the many, many plugs and cords needed to turn it on. I shall write something more meaningful tonight. Be well.

Cesar Chavez, Trump and Illegal Immigration.

I remember Cesar Chavez, heck we hold a holiday for him in California. I also remember Edward R. Murrow, the best journalist ever. Decades ago, Mr. Murrow did an investigative report about how Mexicans were treated on the farms in California. The wealthy use illegal immigrants to keep costs down by not paying them what legal Americans get for the same work. Nothing has changed.

Let me ask you a question, why are wealthy Americans paying to fight Trump on illegal immigration, because they care so much about them or because they make so much off of them. Follow the money every time and you will get the answers you seek 99% of the time.

Let's be clear, if I was poor and lived in Mexico, I would find a way to get her. Heck, My great-grandfather came here from Ireland to avoid being killed by the British because he had killed a English soldier and was part of the original Irish Republican Army. Having said that, who in their mind would be promoting more illegal immigration and who would benefit from it? It is because they are illegal immigrants that the people who employ them can pay them less. It is simple math, oh, and the employers don't have to pay Social Security, Workers Compensation or make sure that they have healthcare.

Firstly, I believe in community and nation. God, family and country. I am an American of Irish decent, I am an American first because this country took my family in. Secondly, if it were not for Mexican immigration, we would not have enough people to do our jobs and certainly not enough who we could live with without extreme problems. I don't shy from issues, would you rather have 12 million illegal Mexican immigrants or 12 million illegal Arab Muslim immigrants? Don't shy from the question, say it doesn't matter and let others judge whether you are right or wrong. Look to Brussels of England for your answer. Mexicans don't have their own version of the law, Muslims have Sharia law and enforce it on people in countries that do not and are democratic rather than theistic. They create their own laws within countries without a vote or any agreement.

So, what is the impact if we allow illegal immigrants to stay in this country on them? They will continue to get less than everyone else and not be made citizens, they will not even be second class citizens. Now, what would benefit illegal immigrants, only two things, either they get kicked out or are given the chance to be legal citizens. Trump has said that he will kick them all out and then allow them back in the country if they had not committed crimes. Is that better or worse for illegal immigrants? How come the people who are against Trump over this issue don't just want to give them all citizenship? Not a tough question, they want them here; but, they don't want to give them the same rights as citizens and want to be able to kick them out if they fight the system. That is the money and that is the truth.

Now lets talk about Cesar Chavez again, what would he say? Hmmmm, he wanted everyone that worked on the farms to have the same rights, he wanted all that worked on the farms to be treated fairly and paid fairly. Remember what Kasich wanted for his state that was mainly agricultural, he wanted work visas with no benefits for the illegals, he represents the establishment view of immigrants, cheap labor with no rights. Think about it.

More Media Propaganda Exposed.

Yahoo - Trump moneyman’s shady history.  So the Republican National Committee and the Trump for President organization have joined together for joint fundraising. This is pretty common, when someone gets their party's nomination they work with their parties national committee to coordinate their actions. Joint committee means that Trump and the RNC chose members of the committee, that is sort of what joint means. In fact during a dinner in Los Angeles, Trump said he was glad to be raising funds to help the party keep Hillary from being elected. That is an odd thing to say, isn't it? He is the nominee, why didn't he say he was thrilled to be raising money for his general campaign. Hmmmm.

Well, it turns out that one of the members on that committee is a man from Los Angeles who I have written about many times over the years, Mr. Elliot Broidy. Mr. Broidy sat on the pension boards for the City of Los Angeles and the state of California, he also pled guilty to felony charges over his bribing government officials in New York. In fact, one of the people who he bribed was the Comptroller for the State of New York. As for Mr. Broidy, I am on record for having called for him to be questioned regarding his actions on the pension boards of California and Los Angeles. I have dozens and dozens of posts calling the man a crook and they go back seven years. I am not afraid of either Mr. Broidy or CIM Group suing me because I never post what I cannot back up and always identify my sources and provide links to them. While I suspect both of them of more than I will write about at the moment, I will not make accusations I cannot document. This is the same reason that I will not post accusations that I have received regarding the death of Pastor Carol Daniels, for that my answer remains constant, if you have proof take it to the police not the Pimpernel. If either CIM or Mr. Broidy chose to sue me, I would get answers to my questions to them and they would settle with me out of court in my favor rather than answer them. I have studied them for seven years or so and know exactly who I would drag into depositions. What is the point of all this, I know a lot about Mr. Broidy; but, what I do not know is whether he is working for the RNC or the Vote Trump faction; but, I have an idea. I know that Mr. Broidy has worked fundraisers for Republicans for decades, in fact Mr. Broidy has worked for awhile on the Republican Jewish Coalition.

I bring this up because, well, surprise, the media is intentionally making false innuendos about Trump without backing it up. I want you to do a internet search for "Donald Trump" "Elliot Broidy", you will not find anything linking them in the past and don't forget, Broidy was busted in New York where Trump is big news. In fact, five of the 20 members of the coalition sat on the Republican Jewish Coalition, many of whom worked on those groups during the Bush administration. Here is an article from the Times of Israel - Five Jewish donors on joint GOP-Trump fundraising team. You see, Mr. Broidy has been a big Israel supporter and many of his companies investments were in Israel companies, in fact, he has said that he created one of the funds specifically to promote investment in Israel. The article from the Israeli press says that many American Jews are leery of Trump because he has not given 100% of his support to anything that Israel might do and wants Israel to negotiate with the Palestinians.

Now, here is what is amazing, if you search for Trump and Broidy, you will find dozens and dozens of articles saying that Broidy is Trump's "shady" moneyman. Firstly, Mr. Broidy is not "shady", he is a convicted criminal. Secondly, there is nobody who has written that Trump hired or chose Mr. Broidy or even if Broidy is on the committee representing the RNC or Trump, why not? If Trump and Broidy have a past, why not doesn't the media disclose it, I would. Here is another question, why are there more articles about Broidy working on this joint committee than there were outside of New York when he pled guilty to bribing the New York State Comptroller?

How many people are going to pick up on this fact?  How many reading these articles about "Trump moneyman" are going to know anything about Mr. Broidy's history? How many are going to question the article or look at what it doesn't say, how it uses misdirection to imply things that are misleading? Look, the reality is that nobody cares about this article or the implications, nobody trusts the media when it comes to Trump. There is a thing called overplaying your hand and the media has done it; but, doesn't know what else to do.

Over the last couple of days there has been a lot of talk about how establishment Republicans are considering supporting the Libertarian candidate as a third party candidate so that Trump will not win. LOL. This is the dumbest idea I have read in a long time and lets face it, there have been many dumb ideas by the establishment to stop Trump that have failed miserably. If you are a liberal then you probably always believed Republicans are racists, so why are their "leaders" fighting Trump. Some say the Republicans created Trump; but, were only kidding. The Republican establishment is only concerned with tax breaks for the wealthy, they don't care about Americans, the middle class, illegal immigrants, gays, abortion or anything else, just their pocketbook and that fits in perfectly with the Libertarian PARTY, not the Libertarian philosophy. True middle class and working class Republicans will not vote for the Libertarian Party, not gonna happen. I should also point out that the vast majority of Republicans are more concerned about Hillary winning than believe a vote for a Libertarian Party candidate will stop her. That is just a fact. If you get confused, remember, 6 companies own 90% of all the media and all six are globalists, not American nationalists.