Lets be honest, I am no Trump supporter, I wanted Bernie to win (no longer, he is a grand disappointment) I have a decade of posts to show what I believe. I certainly don't want to see Trump removed from office for baloney. You are a complete fool if you think Republicans wont impeach the next Democratic president if they control the house. Democrats are saying at least they will have an asterisk next to Trumps name as being impeached, it means nothing when every future President has one by their name.
Desperation is never a good look. The donor class told the Democrats to impeach Trump, Pelosi said it is not a good political move, they told her to do it anyways. She did. The donors believe they can bribe enough Republicans in the senate to remove Trump. Remember when one of oligarchs offered Trump one billion dollars to leave the Presidential race, I do, I wrote about it.
Nobody is going after Democrats that voted to impeach, people understand politics. A Republican senator that votes to remove Trump from should be very afraid. They will not be seen as partisan, they will be seen as traitors. Trump has a 90% approval with Republicans.
We all know this attack upon Trump is not about the Ukraine call. It is not an attack on Trump, it is an attack on the working class. The working class didn't change to Republican from Democrat, they changed to Trumpians. The working class wanted someone that cared about them and Trump did. He kept his promises to them and that is powerful when nobody else has in 40 years. Bill Clinton gave China favored nation status in trade a year after they slaughtered protestors in Tiananmen Square. Bill Clinton signed NAFTA. Obama pushed for the TPP which would have prevented the United States from having manufacturing at all. The Paris Climate Accord would have made sure that the United States could never manufacture anything again. Trump killed it.
This is about killing the midwest and working class and they have to go through Trump to do it. Each year I post the Bilderberg agendas. Next years will be about Trump, Brexit and globalism, bet me.
Thursday, December 19, 2019
Thursday, December 5, 2019
Purpose of Impeachment
The history of the presidency is important to understand when looking at the purpose of impeachment. Unfortunately, this history was not raised in the Judiciary committee. To begin with George Washington was NOT our first President, most people don't know that.
Our first constitution was called the Articles of Confederation and went into effect in 1781 and lasted until 1789. Under it the President of the United States in Congress Assembled. The office was under the direct control of congress more like a Prime Minister. In the 8 years under the Articles of Confederation they had 10 different Presidents.
The founding fathers decided to create a true executive and upon creating the constitution that we now have they created the independent office of the President. Where the prior position faced votes of no confidence and could be removed based on policy differences, new Presidents could not and could only be removed for "treason, bribery or other high crimes and misdemeanors".
In the case of Trump he is not accused of treason, taking a bribe or any crime. While some have argued that the President can be removed for any reason that is simply not what the constitution said and is not what the constitution intended. FYI, the first President under the Articles of Confederation was Samuel Huntington who held the position for about 5 months.
Our first constitution was called the Articles of Confederation and went into effect in 1781 and lasted until 1789. Under it the President of the United States in Congress Assembled. The office was under the direct control of congress more like a Prime Minister. In the 8 years under the Articles of Confederation they had 10 different Presidents.
The founding fathers decided to create a true executive and upon creating the constitution that we now have they created the independent office of the President. Where the prior position faced votes of no confidence and could be removed based on policy differences, new Presidents could not and could only be removed for "treason, bribery or other high crimes and misdemeanors".
In the case of Trump he is not accused of treason, taking a bribe or any crime. While some have argued that the President can be removed for any reason that is simply not what the constitution said and is not what the constitution intended. FYI, the first President under the Articles of Confederation was Samuel Huntington who held the position for about 5 months.
Saturday, November 23, 2019
Trump's real crime in the minds of elites
Today the Washington Post finally admitted that they don't believe a President should make foreign policy, the civil servants and diplomatic core should.
Washington Post - In Trump's Washington, the rogue actors are the real players - and the experts are increasingly irrelevant
These "experts" are the ones who got us involved in wars in Iraq, Somalia, Libya, Syria and want us to go to war with Iran. These are the same people who got us involved in Vietnam and caused the Bay of Pigs. These are the "career civil servants" that hate the idea of democracy and believe the average person is just some "smelly Walmart shoppers". When they testify before congress you can see them smirk in the self satisfied superiority they feel over us. They attend private meetings of the "elites" where they all agree on how the world should be run and deride democracy as populism. These are the same people that monitor all our online activities while denying it in public.
What do these people believe, they believe that Russia's refusal to give up their sovereignty threatens the world they seek to create. They seek war in the Ukraine will allow them to place gas pipelines into Europe so they no longer need to get their oil from Russia and they are willing to have the average person's children die in war to achieve this goal. They believe that the Venezuelan government should be outed so that nations oil can be privatized and sold to Exxon Mobil.
These "experts" created the laws that allowed American manufacturing to be sent to China and in private they say that they wish the United States was more like China with no democracy and strict control over the citizens. Read the article, it doesn't talk about Trump committing a crime, it says his true crime is thinking that as President, he gets to make foreign policy even when he doesn't agree with them.
Now With An Update:
The Atlantic - Foreign Policy Isn't Just Up To Trump And yet another article arguing that foreign policy is not the purview of the President. Hmmmm. Interesting timing. They attempted to make the impeachment inquiry about foreign affairs and Presidential power even though they claimed it was about Quid Pro Quo. It should be clear by now that that failed miserably.
So, what is with the new media push. Oh yeah, Trump wouldn't pass the Trans Pacific Partnership and is getting us out of the Paris Climate Accord. What do you want to bet that if Trump is re-elected, the congress will attempt to pass them without the President submitting them to them, which is required constitutionally? If you keep seeing articles like the one from the Post and the Atlantic then that is exactly what you can expect.
Washington Post - In Trump's Washington, the rogue actors are the real players - and the experts are increasingly irrelevant
These "experts" are the ones who got us involved in wars in Iraq, Somalia, Libya, Syria and want us to go to war with Iran. These are the same people who got us involved in Vietnam and caused the Bay of Pigs. These are the "career civil servants" that hate the idea of democracy and believe the average person is just some "smelly Walmart shoppers". When they testify before congress you can see them smirk in the self satisfied superiority they feel over us. They attend private meetings of the "elites" where they all agree on how the world should be run and deride democracy as populism. These are the same people that monitor all our online activities while denying it in public.
What do these people believe, they believe that Russia's refusal to give up their sovereignty threatens the world they seek to create. They seek war in the Ukraine will allow them to place gas pipelines into Europe so they no longer need to get their oil from Russia and they are willing to have the average person's children die in war to achieve this goal. They believe that the Venezuelan government should be outed so that nations oil can be privatized and sold to Exxon Mobil.
These "experts" created the laws that allowed American manufacturing to be sent to China and in private they say that they wish the United States was more like China with no democracy and strict control over the citizens. Read the article, it doesn't talk about Trump committing a crime, it says his true crime is thinking that as President, he gets to make foreign policy even when he doesn't agree with them.
Now With An Update:
The Atlantic - Foreign Policy Isn't Just Up To Trump And yet another article arguing that foreign policy is not the purview of the President. Hmmmm. Interesting timing. They attempted to make the impeachment inquiry about foreign affairs and Presidential power even though they claimed it was about Quid Pro Quo. It should be clear by now that that failed miserably.
So, what is with the new media push. Oh yeah, Trump wouldn't pass the Trans Pacific Partnership and is getting us out of the Paris Climate Accord. What do you want to bet that if Trump is re-elected, the congress will attempt to pass them without the President submitting them to them, which is required constitutionally? If you keep seeing articles like the one from the Post and the Atlantic then that is exactly what you can expect.
Friday, November 22, 2019
Final Impeachment Inquiry Hearing
Thursday was pitiful. We have seen a Democratic house of congress embarrass themselves and this nation. When I used to negotiate contracts, it was my job to walk into a room and immediately know who and what I was dealing with, I was very good at it. As a stage manager it was my job to know an audience and read what would work better with them and I was very good at it. If you watch the final words by Adam Schiff, he was frustrated and desperate. He knows he has lost. He has lost more than the impeachment, he has lost his status with the Democratic party, he is the guy that messed up the Trump impeachment.
In politics and entertainment, losers are shunned. Nobody wants it to rub off on them. Mr. Schiff is done in his party. He has twice promised the world to people who hate Trump and delivered nothing. The party will not admit that Trump did nothing wrong anymore than they will admit that Trump is not a Russian asset, they will blame Schiff for not proving it.
My prediction, congress is going into recess, when they return they will do nothing about impeachment and will pivot to the new North American trade agreement. Schiff will be left to make his report to the full house and it will be mentioned and ignored. The Democrats in the House will not have a vote on articles of impeachment based on these hearings and will blame it on the Senate saying that the Senate would not act on it if they did. Put a fork in it, this meal is done.
In politics and entertainment, losers are shunned. Nobody wants it to rub off on them. Mr. Schiff is done in his party. He has twice promised the world to people who hate Trump and delivered nothing. The party will not admit that Trump did nothing wrong anymore than they will admit that Trump is not a Russian asset, they will blame Schiff for not proving it.
My prediction, congress is going into recess, when they return they will do nothing about impeachment and will pivot to the new North American trade agreement. Schiff will be left to make his report to the full house and it will be mentioned and ignored. The Democrats in the House will not have a vote on articles of impeachment based on these hearings and will blame it on the Senate saying that the Senate would not act on it if they did. Put a fork in it, this meal is done.
Saturday, November 16, 2019
Day 2 - Impeachment Inquiry
I stayed awake all night to watch Day 1 of the hearings and then again for Day 2. I witnessed nothing. We are told Trump is being investigated for trying to blackmail (originally we were told it was a tit for tat or Quid pro quo investigation).the Ukrainian President. One would assume we would hear from people who witnessed such a thing, we did not.
Day 1, we heard from a disgruntled employee that Trump didn't do what they told him to do regarding the Ukraine. He stated that he was not in on the call Trump had with the Ukrainian President and got all his information from someone who heard someone who had a guess. He witnessed nothing and had no evidence, at all. His co-witness knew even less; but, did say he thought that the company that Biden's son worked for should be investigated. The point that both made was that they thought the Ukraine was important to the United States. This is all fine and good; but, has nothing to do with impeaching the President. In fact both witnesses said they didn't know of anything the President should be impeached for. The general assumption was that these were the star witnesses, both of whom had previously been witnesses in closed door meetings.
To me Day 1 was a joke. My brother wanted to give them a benefit of a doubt and see if Day 2 would be the real inside dirt. Day 2 was a bigger joke. The witness had left service months before the call and knew nothing about it. Her complaint was that she was replaced by another Ambassador to the Ukraine. She claimed nothing about crimes by Trump.
The process of the hearings itself was a complete disgrace where the Chairman, Mr. Schiff, refused to allow questions by one congresswoman, a Republican. This is a kangaroo court and a disgrace of congress. This has nothing to do with what people think of Trump and everything to do with what people believe is fair and just.
I have made it clear over the years that I hate the "Patriot Act" which says people don't always get to have a trial and can be detained indefinitely without one, it is an abomination to the constitution and Bush signed it. We have no justice when we allow the process to change based on attitudes towards the accused personally.
Pimpernel has a law degree with honors and multiple American Jurisprudence Awards. I consider the United States Constitution the second greatest written document next to the Bible. The short sightedness of this by the Democrats shows their desperation over removing Trump before he gets re-elected. The techniques they are using will be used against the next Democratic president. That is how politics works and I know because I was in the game for half my life.
I remember when Kennedy was killed and even more so when his brother was. I remember Watergate and personally knew people who interacted with John Dean at the time. In fact, a friend was asked to represent Nixon before the impeachment hearing on some tax thing, he declined. He was a famous attorney and when I was in law school took me to dinner one night, he even let me stay at his beach house and was incredibly kind to allow me to have my graduation party at the same house. He met me when I was in sixth grade; but, my mom and dad had helped him. While we were dining together, prior to my graduation, he asked me if I would represent someone I knew was guilty of a crime. I told him I wasn't sure. He asked me if the system could work if the accused could not have people who understood the law refuse to represent people. He asked if Doctors should refuse medical assistance to people they didn't like. What about the fire department? I fear a society where we only make sure that the people we like get fairness in process.
You can only have a totalitarian society when you care more about personality than policy. Remember these words, they were learned by someone who live through the Nazi regimn.
FIRST THEY CAME
First they came for the socialists, and I did not speak out
Because I was not a socialist
Then they came for the trade unionists, and I did not speak out
Because I was not a trade uinionist
Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out
Because I was not a Jew
Then they came for me and there was no one left to speak for me.
Only fools think they are denying Trump and Roger Stone their rights, nope, they are establishing a system where those rights don't exist anymore for anyone.
News Sites
I read dozens of news sites each day. I read sites from both the left and right, I also watch dozens of YouTube political channels. For links to conservative sites I usually go to The Drudge Report, I find I no longer wish to use that site so I am creating this link list to give me quick access to the conservative sites I follow and I through in some conspiracy discussion sites as they always link to unusual news sources. This is in no way an endorsement of any site. It is also not exhaustive. On rare occasions I will read extremist sites of the left and the right; but, I choose not to list any of them. I also read multiple foreign sites, such as English newspapers, I look them up depending on the issue of the day. Perhaps down the road I will add some of them to this list.
News sites
Breitbart
Daily Caller
Daily Wire
Hill
Infowars
Intercept
LA Daily News
LA Times
National Review
New York Post
Real Clear Politics
Washington Examiner
WND
Zerohedge
Above Top Secret
The Daily Grail
Coast to Coast AM
Matt Taibbi - Substack.
News sites
Breitbart
Daily Caller
Daily Wire
Hill
Infowars
Intercept
LA Daily News
LA Times
National Review
New York Post
Real Clear Politics
Washington Examiner
WND
Zerohedge
Above Top Secret
The Daily Grail
Coast to Coast AM
Matt Taibbi - Substack.
The Daily Mail - UK
Thursday, November 7, 2019
Monday, October 14, 2019
The Death of Fairness Under the Law.
“We want to make sure that we meet the needs of the investigation and not give the president or his legal minions the opportunity to tailor their testimony and in some cases fabricate testimony to suit their interests,” the California Democrat said Sunday on CBS’s “Face the Nation.”
Wow. The above quote came from Adam Schiff. They don't believe the President should be allowed to know what he is being accused of or by whom. Think about that. Only totalitarians treat the accused that way.
Yahoo - Bloomberg - Schiff says secret testimony aimed at keeping Trump in the dark.
Wow. The above quote came from Adam Schiff. They don't believe the President should be allowed to know what he is being accused of or by whom. Think about that. Only totalitarians treat the accused that way.
Yahoo - Bloomberg - Schiff says secret testimony aimed at keeping Trump in the dark.
Friday, October 11, 2019
It is not media bias, it is propaganda.
There are countries where you are presumed guilty until proven innocent. Our government is based upon the principal that you are innocent unless proven guilty "beyond a reasonable doubt". This is to prevent the government from prosecuting people based on their political beliefs. This is why we require "probable cause" to even investigate someone. The heart of our criminal justice system is built on the need to ensure a fair trial. A fair trial means the accused: A- Gets the right to confront their accuser; B - Has the right to question witnesses: C - Has the right to have an attorney represent with them: D - Has the right to show additional information: E - Has the right to see all the evidence to be used against them in advance of the trial: F - Has the right to know what they are being charged with once the accusations are charged. This is why you are given a reading of "your rights" (Miranda rights) upon arrest. For the first time in our history, NONE of these rights are being provided to President Trump and the media and the neo-liberals and the neo-cons are all okay with that. Fundamental to making these rights have meaning is the right to talk to you attorney in privacy.
The media and the establishment scream on a daily basis that Trump asking for the same rights is "obstruction of congressional oversight" except, they are not doing oversight, they say they are conducting an "Official Impeachment Inquiry"; but they do not use the word "Formal" because that means you have to follow the rules, the form and that requires that you give due process. The inquiry being done is not official as it has not been sanctioned by the House by vote. By the way, this is still not my post on the Ukraine "scandal". This post is also not just about the impeachment witch hunt. It is about what rules we will all live under.
The second the courts say the President does not have rights to due process, it means you don't either. Many people don't care and that is scary. We are seeing the perversion of fairness. Consider the French revolution, a commoner would point to someone they disliked and say, "I accuse of helping the royals" and they would be hung as guilty, no proof needed. The Soviet Union had a presumption until proven guilty so did the Nazi's. For the past few decades the establishment has been pushing us in that direction. The "#MeToo" movement has clearly said that we should believe all women, something clearly ludicrous to anyone who has lived in a house of women where they constantly call each liars. They don't really believe we should believe all women, they believe we shouldn't believe anything men say.
The same establishment saying Trump is guilty till proven innocent doesn't accept Mueller's finding that Trump did not collude with Russia in the 2016 election. Just a small offside point, the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) which has fought for the rights of Nazi's and Communists has remained completely silent on the Trump inquiry. I have supported those clowns for 50 years and now find them cowards and partisans, rather than protectors of civil rights. I should also mention that in court you cannot use second hand account (someone told me garbage), you have to have heard or witnessed something first hand to testify on it.
You might wish to believe that the denial of basic rights to Trump is one time thing; but, it would be precedent and means it can happen to everyone at anytime. I will tell you this, the Supreme Court will NOT enforce these so called congressional "subpoenas" if they do not comport to and allow for due process. The Democrats in congress know this, that is why they are trying to say "Obstruction of Congressional Oversight" is their charge against Trump without having an underlying crime. The truth is denying someone due process is an obstruction of justice.
For new readers, I did not and don't intend to vote for Trump. I have not voted for a Bush or Clinton. The Nazi's were given more rights during the Nuremberg trials where they were accused of the holocaust.
The media and the establishment scream on a daily basis that Trump asking for the same rights is "obstruction of congressional oversight" except, they are not doing oversight, they say they are conducting an "Official Impeachment Inquiry"; but they do not use the word "Formal" because that means you have to follow the rules, the form and that requires that you give due process. The inquiry being done is not official as it has not been sanctioned by the House by vote. By the way, this is still not my post on the Ukraine "scandal". This post is also not just about the impeachment witch hunt. It is about what rules we will all live under.
The second the courts say the President does not have rights to due process, it means you don't either. Many people don't care and that is scary. We are seeing the perversion of fairness. Consider the French revolution, a commoner would point to someone they disliked and say, "I accuse of helping the royals" and they would be hung as guilty, no proof needed. The Soviet Union had a presumption until proven guilty so did the Nazi's. For the past few decades the establishment has been pushing us in that direction. The "#MeToo" movement has clearly said that we should believe all women, something clearly ludicrous to anyone who has lived in a house of women where they constantly call each liars. They don't really believe we should believe all women, they believe we shouldn't believe anything men say.
The same establishment saying Trump is guilty till proven innocent doesn't accept Mueller's finding that Trump did not collude with Russia in the 2016 election. Just a small offside point, the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) which has fought for the rights of Nazi's and Communists has remained completely silent on the Trump inquiry. I have supported those clowns for 50 years and now find them cowards and partisans, rather than protectors of civil rights. I should also mention that in court you cannot use second hand account (someone told me garbage), you have to have heard or witnessed something first hand to testify on it.
You might wish to believe that the denial of basic rights to Trump is one time thing; but, it would be precedent and means it can happen to everyone at anytime. I will tell you this, the Supreme Court will NOT enforce these so called congressional "subpoenas" if they do not comport to and allow for due process. The Democrats in congress know this, that is why they are trying to say "Obstruction of Congressional Oversight" is their charge against Trump without having an underlying crime. The truth is denying someone due process is an obstruction of justice.
For new readers, I did not and don't intend to vote for Trump. I have not voted for a Bush or Clinton. The Nazi's were given more rights during the Nuremberg trials where they were accused of the holocaust.
Thursday, October 10, 2019
Syria and the Kurds
The Kurds are a distinct ethnic group that used to have a nation; but, lost it. It was broken up after World War I. The Kurds ended up in Turkey, Syria and Iran. There are about 50 million of them and they do not have their own nation. ISIS was an enemy of both the Kurds and the Syrian government. The Kurds fought the members of ISIS and we helped them. ISIS was ended and the Kurds wanted independence from Syria and Turkey, basically, they want to create their own country and are willing to have a civil war to do so.
After ISIS was defeated we reduced troops working with the Kurds until we had only 50 left in the area and Trump removed them too. The media has been claiming that we "abandoned" the Kurds; but, we only worked with them to fight ISIS, not to participate in their civil wars in Syria and Turkey. The Kurds and the Turkish were involved in the genocide of Armenians in the past.
Trump removed 50 soldiers from the area and other countries questioned the move. Hmmm, Australia could send 50 more soldiers there, the EU countries could too. I have never discussed why I distrust Trump on this blog, I have merely said I didn't vote for him and wouldn't. I like the fact he is anti-globalism and did not approve the TPP. I do believe that the elites hate Trump because he is against globalism and that is their main problem with him. Bernie Sanders was against those thing too, which is why the DNC cheated him.
Here is what matter, we don't have a treaty with the Kurds, we do with Turkey, in fact they are our partners in NATO. The Kurds have attacked Turkey from inside and outside the country. Technically, as a member of NATO, an attack upon one is an attack upon all. If we stayed in northern Syria and fought with the Kurds against Turkey, we would be guilty of attacking a NATO country, think about that. The reality is, Turkey wants to take over the northern part of Syria where the Kurds are. Supposedly we want to have a regime change in Syria, so what is the problem? Unless we are going to fight for an independent Kurdish nation and take away part of Turkey, why were we still there? Does anyone really want to go to war with Turkey over creating a new country for the Kurds?
I have been patiently saving articles and preparing to write about the "Ukrainian Call Scandal" but I am not ready to post yet. I am waiting on a couple of more shoes to drop. I will say this, Trump committed no crime and none has been specified by his opponents which is why they are not prepared to write articles of impeachment.
After ISIS was defeated we reduced troops working with the Kurds until we had only 50 left in the area and Trump removed them too. The media has been claiming that we "abandoned" the Kurds; but, we only worked with them to fight ISIS, not to participate in their civil wars in Syria and Turkey. The Kurds and the Turkish were involved in the genocide of Armenians in the past.
Trump removed 50 soldiers from the area and other countries questioned the move. Hmmm, Australia could send 50 more soldiers there, the EU countries could too. I have never discussed why I distrust Trump on this blog, I have merely said I didn't vote for him and wouldn't. I like the fact he is anti-globalism and did not approve the TPP. I do believe that the elites hate Trump because he is against globalism and that is their main problem with him. Bernie Sanders was against those thing too, which is why the DNC cheated him.
Here is what matter, we don't have a treaty with the Kurds, we do with Turkey, in fact they are our partners in NATO. The Kurds have attacked Turkey from inside and outside the country. Technically, as a member of NATO, an attack upon one is an attack upon all. If we stayed in northern Syria and fought with the Kurds against Turkey, we would be guilty of attacking a NATO country, think about that. The reality is, Turkey wants to take over the northern part of Syria where the Kurds are. Supposedly we want to have a regime change in Syria, so what is the problem? Unless we are going to fight for an independent Kurdish nation and take away part of Turkey, why were we still there? Does anyone really want to go to war with Turkey over creating a new country for the Kurds?
I have been patiently saving articles and preparing to write about the "Ukrainian Call Scandal" but I am not ready to post yet. I am waiting on a couple of more shoes to drop. I will say this, Trump committed no crime and none has been specified by his opponents which is why they are not prepared to write articles of impeachment.
Tuesday, September 24, 2019
What is a "Formal Impeachment Inquiry"
Nancy Pelosi has announced that the House will begin a "Formal Impeachment Inquiry". The only problem is that there is no such thing. The constitution allows only for Impeachment and for that the House must pass "Articles of Impeachment" outlying the alleged crimes. As for House investigations they could investigate crimes; but, they must state what crime they are investigating and they still haven't done so.
This is all a perverse and cynical abuse of process. If the House is convinced that a crime was committed then they should request a special prosecutor be appointed to investigate a specific crime, as was done with Mueller. They don't want to do that because this is just a show for the cameras to appease the Democrats base.
This is all a perverse and cynical abuse of process. If the House is convinced that a crime was committed then they should request a special prosecutor be appointed to investigate a specific crime, as was done with Mueller. They don't want to do that because this is just a show for the cameras to appease the Democrats base.
Britain's New Supreme courts mistake
The English Supreme Court has just made a terrible mistake. It has decided that the Prime Minister had illegally suspended their Parliament because he had not proven that he did not do it for a bad reason. This decision will come back to haunt them and shows they have not learned from other countries. One must understand that England did not even have a Supreme Court until recently and that it is trying to determine what its place should be.
Here are the facts. Britain does not have a constitution. They say they do; but, it is not written down, so they don't. The Prime Minister has the right to request the Monarch"prorogate" (suspend) Parliament. In fact, as recently as 2012 the Queen suspended Canada's Parliament for purely political reasons. In fact, this ruling means that the Queen has no independent authority to make any decisions. This is and of itself is a major shift in the law in England. The decision also says that the Prime Minister must prove he did not have a "Wrong intent" in exercising his decisions, this is simply unprovable and opens up ever decision to judicial review.
The worst part of this decision is that it says if you have multiple reasons to do something as Prime Minister, you must prove none of them were political. This is stupid and has been rejected by the United States Supreme Court because nothing is done for one reason. I could go on and on; but, the reality is, the UK Supreme Court has made the worst decision possible for them in the long term and the reality is that they have done so over Brexit.
Here are the facts. Britain does not have a constitution. They say they do; but, it is not written down, so they don't. The Prime Minister has the right to request the Monarch"prorogate" (suspend) Parliament. In fact, as recently as 2012 the Queen suspended Canada's Parliament for purely political reasons. In fact, this ruling means that the Queen has no independent authority to make any decisions. This is and of itself is a major shift in the law in England. The decision also says that the Prime Minister must prove he did not have a "Wrong intent" in exercising his decisions, this is simply unprovable and opens up ever decision to judicial review.
The worst part of this decision is that it says if you have multiple reasons to do something as Prime Minister, you must prove none of them were political. This is stupid and has been rejected by the United States Supreme Court because nothing is done for one reason. I could go on and on; but, the reality is, the UK Supreme Court has made the worst decision possible for them in the long term and the reality is that they have done so over Brexit.
Sunday, September 22, 2019
Tuesday, September 10, 2019
How the establishment tries to prevent democracy.
I often talk about the wealthy's hate of democracy, the establishment is now showing and saying so in public.
True Median - The Shocking Paper Predicts the End of Democracy. An article about an elite professor who believes there should not be democracy because people are too stupid to control their own lives.
Another example is what is going on in Britain. The people of Britain voted to leave the European Union THREE years ago. It actually pre-dated Trump getting elected. The government chose to negotiate with the European Union for three years. The deal for leaving they were offered was worse than being in the EU. It was a vengeance agreement and it was voted down by their Parliament three times. This same parliament resulted in their prime minister (May) and about a week ago they put in Boris Johnson. Johnson said he would get out of the EU on October 31, 2019; but, would seek to get a new deal with the EU if possible and that if necessary he would leave the EU with no deal. The Parliament commanded him to seek a deal and that they would not accept a no deal. He asked to have a general election (people voting for their representatives in Parliament) as is common and they voted against that too. The English voted to leave the EU and all the politicians that said they would follow the will of the voters have shown they don't want to hear from the people or do what the people voted for.
Another example is impeaching Trump. Our establishment is globalist and Trump is not. He was constitutionally elected and is the lawful President. I don't trust Trump, am a Tulsi supporter and had previously been a Sanders supporter. I do not want Trump impeached for NO reason. We spent three years talking about and investigate Russiagate and found nothing. When Mueller came out and said there was NO Russia-Trump collusion they decided it was time to impeach Trump. They have so far offered NO firm reason for impeachment, so they want to investigate everything that Trump ever did in his life. The vast majority of Americans are AGAINST impeachment. Many in the Democratic political machine just don't care what people think because they are globalists.
Here is a good video that talks about this all.
True Median - The Shocking Paper Predicts the End of Democracy. An article about an elite professor who believes there should not be democracy because people are too stupid to control their own lives.
Another example is what is going on in Britain. The people of Britain voted to leave the European Union THREE years ago. It actually pre-dated Trump getting elected. The government chose to negotiate with the European Union for three years. The deal for leaving they were offered was worse than being in the EU. It was a vengeance agreement and it was voted down by their Parliament three times. This same parliament resulted in their prime minister (May) and about a week ago they put in Boris Johnson. Johnson said he would get out of the EU on October 31, 2019; but, would seek to get a new deal with the EU if possible and that if necessary he would leave the EU with no deal. The Parliament commanded him to seek a deal and that they would not accept a no deal. He asked to have a general election (people voting for their representatives in Parliament) as is common and they voted against that too. The English voted to leave the EU and all the politicians that said they would follow the will of the voters have shown they don't want to hear from the people or do what the people voted for.
Another example is impeaching Trump. Our establishment is globalist and Trump is not. He was constitutionally elected and is the lawful President. I don't trust Trump, am a Tulsi supporter and had previously been a Sanders supporter. I do not want Trump impeached for NO reason. We spent three years talking about and investigate Russiagate and found nothing. When Mueller came out and said there was NO Russia-Trump collusion they decided it was time to impeach Trump. They have so far offered NO firm reason for impeachment, so they want to investigate everything that Trump ever did in his life. The vast majority of Americans are AGAINST impeachment. Many in the Democratic political machine just don't care what people think because they are globalists.
Here is a good video that talks about this all.
Friday, August 23, 2019
August 23, 2009 Pastor Carol Daniels Died.
August 23, 2009 Pastor Carol Daniels was killed in her church during Sunday service. In July of 2010, I became aware of her murder. before; but, expected someone to be caught. I sort of loosely followed it as I do many things. On July 10, 2010 I decided to write about it. I may have written prior; but, I destroyed all my prior blogs. This is the third generation of this blog. The other two are long gone
As this blog had served it's original purpose I intended to end it forever. One day I prepared to delete all posts and write no more; but, there was a problem. Turned out that people came to this blog, not my regular readers; but, people came specifically to read my few posts about Pastor Daniels. It messed my head up, not the intent of this blog to discuss crime.
I have only ever driven through or flown over Oklahoma. The people were nice enough at the restaurant I ate at. I just didn't like the place and tornadoes scare me, I don't mind earthquakes. I don't understand tornadoes. Somewhere in the early 2000s we drove my dad back from the east to California after my mother had died. We drove through Oklahoma and I saw a tornado, we drove till we were out of the state. I didn't know anything about Pastor Daniels church or denomination. The only thing I knew was that the police were clueless and not thinking about the most obvious clues. The Oklahoma media was worse, they sensationalized the more gruesome aspects and ignored the facts. I had seen this before with the BTK killer. He killed in Kansas and they originally sought a Hispanic man, turned out they were looking for his first victim and not him. They were convinced BTK was not one of them, just like the Oklahoma police. Cops are people and few are trained investigators.
Because so many people seemed interested, I gave updates. That may have been a mistake on my part. I became one of the most referenced people in regards to the murder. Read the last year of my blog, it is mostly politics and has been for over four years. I was going to finally end my blogging and two things happened. The people that read only about Pastor Daniels contacted me, not knowing I was going to end the blog and the people that read everything else asked to me to keep about everything else. I decided to delete everything except the stuff about Pastor Daniels and leave it a dead site. If you don't kill a thing completely it comes back and this blog did. I kept writing. My posts about Pastor Daniels don't make up 1% of my posts. This blog is not monetized nor advertised so I have never made a penny from it, not one, not ever a free meal or cup of coffee.
My life has changed a lot since I started following this case. When a member of her family contacted me I had a meltdown. It fried my brain, I didn't understand why they would bother contacting me. The sad truth is, nobody else was following after the initial reports other than me and eventually Websleuths. I have received more comments from people than anyone else regarding this case. I personally told the OSBI they were free to monitor my site for anything related to the case including comments. I have never been personally contacted by the OSBI or the FBI or the local Oklahoma police about anything.
This post is not so much about Pastor Daniels yet. It is only August 9th and I will not post until the 23rd. I am hoping I will have an update, I am hoping the Oklahoma media will post about her death's anniversary. Whether they do or don't I will post this to remind people that a good woman died to the hands of a butcher who has yet to be identified.
To Pastor Daniels family, I say I am sorry that I couldn't do more. Here is what we know. The police knowingly lied when they blamed it on a dead junkie. The video they used from in front of the church contradicts their accusations. Think about it, you will get it. The murderer never entered or left through the front door, the videotape proves that. This means the killer exited by the backdoor. Now, if the killer had a car then it was videotaped if it left via the front street to the church. The videotape would also show when the front door was closed after Pastor Daniels entered as she usually kept it open. Who closed the front door, the killer of Pastor Daniels? We know who locked the front door and it wasn't Pastor Daniels. There are only two possibilities. Either the murderer waited for her to enter and then locked the front door so she couldn't leave or she entered the church for Sunday services and locked the front door behind her. There is a remote third possibility and that is that the killer killed her and then locked the door.
How many people in all of that town knew her rituals? How many people would know to not come in through or leave through the front door? How many people within a one block radius didn't go to church that Sunday? How many people knew her screams would not be heard a block away at the police station or the gas station? What truly disgusts me is that the OSBI have given up on this case and declared it a dead file rather than a cold case. The Kansas police did a poor job with BTK; but, they kept it open. The OSBI isn't even that good. I don't know what the motive was; but, it wasn't robbery. Only a complete idiot would believe that. I don't think the motive was racial or we would have seen more and not just in churches. Someone knew she would be alone and the church would be empty. This was planned well in advance. This was personal at least on the killer's part even if she didn't know them.
UPDATE:
I didn't find any 10 year anniversary news articles and it is now the 23rd. I know people were looking the past couple of weeks to see if I would update the story from the searches that brought people here. I couldn't find any. My apologies to the Daniels family for not having anything more to offer. To them I say, be at peace. Pastor Daniels would want you to enjoy your lives and not be bitter. I have watched the news videos, I have seen and heard your words and faces. I know she taught you love and forgiveness. I send you my love and prayers, all I got. I don't believe I will be around another ten years, I am okay with that. I wont delete this blog again because of Pastor Daniels and the fact that people still come here to find out about her. You cannot ever understand me by just reading the posts about Pastor Daniels, I am a burnt out old political operative. I shall leave you with this.
A number of years ago I was asked to preach and did so for five years, never made a penny and it cost me money, never deducted it off my taxes. I worked a full time job while preaching. I thought I gave some decent sermons, people came with questions afterwards, I seemed to have reached them. The one sermon I gave that was the hardest for people to hear was about forgiveness. I asked the congregation, if they believed that we had to forgive to be forgiven and they all said yes. I then asked if we should start by forgiving the person who cheated getting in line first, should they start with the easy ones. That confused them, they knew me. I then said that to be a Christian means forgiving the one you least want to forgive first, the one person you don't feel you should ever forgive must be the first. Forgiveness saves you, God judges people and it is the rejection of forgiveness that hurts us. I told my adulteress ex, that I forgave her and she told me she didn't want any of my forgiveness. I hope she takes it someday because to refuse forgiveness is to pour hot coals on your own head.
Be well.
As this blog had served it's original purpose I intended to end it forever. One day I prepared to delete all posts and write no more; but, there was a problem. Turned out that people came to this blog, not my regular readers; but, people came specifically to read my few posts about Pastor Daniels. It messed my head up, not the intent of this blog to discuss crime.
I have only ever driven through or flown over Oklahoma. The people were nice enough at the restaurant I ate at. I just didn't like the place and tornadoes scare me, I don't mind earthquakes. I don't understand tornadoes. Somewhere in the early 2000s we drove my dad back from the east to California after my mother had died. We drove through Oklahoma and I saw a tornado, we drove till we were out of the state. I didn't know anything about Pastor Daniels church or denomination. The only thing I knew was that the police were clueless and not thinking about the most obvious clues. The Oklahoma media was worse, they sensationalized the more gruesome aspects and ignored the facts. I had seen this before with the BTK killer. He killed in Kansas and they originally sought a Hispanic man, turned out they were looking for his first victim and not him. They were convinced BTK was not one of them, just like the Oklahoma police. Cops are people and few are trained investigators.
Because so many people seemed interested, I gave updates. That may have been a mistake on my part. I became one of the most referenced people in regards to the murder. Read the last year of my blog, it is mostly politics and has been for over four years. I was going to finally end my blogging and two things happened. The people that read only about Pastor Daniels contacted me, not knowing I was going to end the blog and the people that read everything else asked to me to keep about everything else. I decided to delete everything except the stuff about Pastor Daniels and leave it a dead site. If you don't kill a thing completely it comes back and this blog did. I kept writing. My posts about Pastor Daniels don't make up 1% of my posts. This blog is not monetized nor advertised so I have never made a penny from it, not one, not ever a free meal or cup of coffee.
My life has changed a lot since I started following this case. When a member of her family contacted me I had a meltdown. It fried my brain, I didn't understand why they would bother contacting me. The sad truth is, nobody else was following after the initial reports other than me and eventually Websleuths. I have received more comments from people than anyone else regarding this case. I personally told the OSBI they were free to monitor my site for anything related to the case including comments. I have never been personally contacted by the OSBI or the FBI or the local Oklahoma police about anything.
This post is not so much about Pastor Daniels yet. It is only August 9th and I will not post until the 23rd. I am hoping I will have an update, I am hoping the Oklahoma media will post about her death's anniversary. Whether they do or don't I will post this to remind people that a good woman died to the hands of a butcher who has yet to be identified.
To Pastor Daniels family, I say I am sorry that I couldn't do more. Here is what we know. The police knowingly lied when they blamed it on a dead junkie. The video they used from in front of the church contradicts their accusations. Think about it, you will get it. The murderer never entered or left through the front door, the videotape proves that. This means the killer exited by the backdoor. Now, if the killer had a car then it was videotaped if it left via the front street to the church. The videotape would also show when the front door was closed after Pastor Daniels entered as she usually kept it open. Who closed the front door, the killer of Pastor Daniels? We know who locked the front door and it wasn't Pastor Daniels. There are only two possibilities. Either the murderer waited for her to enter and then locked the front door so she couldn't leave or she entered the church for Sunday services and locked the front door behind her. There is a remote third possibility and that is that the killer killed her and then locked the door.
How many people in all of that town knew her rituals? How many people would know to not come in through or leave through the front door? How many people within a one block radius didn't go to church that Sunday? How many people knew her screams would not be heard a block away at the police station or the gas station? What truly disgusts me is that the OSBI have given up on this case and declared it a dead file rather than a cold case. The Kansas police did a poor job with BTK; but, they kept it open. The OSBI isn't even that good. I don't know what the motive was; but, it wasn't robbery. Only a complete idiot would believe that. I don't think the motive was racial or we would have seen more and not just in churches. Someone knew she would be alone and the church would be empty. This was planned well in advance. This was personal at least on the killer's part even if she didn't know them.
UPDATE:
I didn't find any 10 year anniversary news articles and it is now the 23rd. I know people were looking the past couple of weeks to see if I would update the story from the searches that brought people here. I couldn't find any. My apologies to the Daniels family for not having anything more to offer. To them I say, be at peace. Pastor Daniels would want you to enjoy your lives and not be bitter. I have watched the news videos, I have seen and heard your words and faces. I know she taught you love and forgiveness. I send you my love and prayers, all I got. I don't believe I will be around another ten years, I am okay with that. I wont delete this blog again because of Pastor Daniels and the fact that people still come here to find out about her. You cannot ever understand me by just reading the posts about Pastor Daniels, I am a burnt out old political operative. I shall leave you with this.
A number of years ago I was asked to preach and did so for five years, never made a penny and it cost me money, never deducted it off my taxes. I worked a full time job while preaching. I thought I gave some decent sermons, people came with questions afterwards, I seemed to have reached them. The one sermon I gave that was the hardest for people to hear was about forgiveness. I asked the congregation, if they believed that we had to forgive to be forgiven and they all said yes. I then asked if we should start by forgiving the person who cheated getting in line first, should they start with the easy ones. That confused them, they knew me. I then said that to be a Christian means forgiving the one you least want to forgive first, the one person you don't feel you should ever forgive must be the first. Forgiveness saves you, God judges people and it is the rejection of forgiveness that hurts us. I told my adulteress ex, that I forgave her and she told me she didn't want any of my forgiveness. I hope she takes it someday because to refuse forgiveness is to pour hot coals on your own head.
Be well.
Thursday, August 22, 2019
How does plastic get in the ocean?
Here are the annual stats.
China - 8.8 million metric tons
Indonesia - 3.2 million metric tons
Philippines - 1.9 million metric tons
Sri Lanka - 1.6 million metric tons
Thailand - 1 million metric tons
Bangladesh - 0.8 million metric tons
United States - 0.3 million metric tons
Now ask me why I don't care if people in the United States use plastic straws.
Only coastal cities put any plastic in the ocean. People landfill their trash close to their societies because it costs too much to ship it. The United States regulates waste disposal. You are not seeing trucks go to the ocean to dump plastic into it, in the United States at least.
We are constantly being lied to. It is so constant that people don't even ask the simplest questions. Do you really believe that when your trash is picked up, the trash company or city separates the plastic bags and straws and then dumps them in the ocean rather than landfilling them in the bags they came in? How bout this, we are told that oil is a billion old dead dinosaurs. If oil is a billion or 100 million years old, it does not biodegrade. Plastic takes up less space than oil because it is a oil concentrate. Therefore plastic takes up less space than oil in the ground.
Where are the large plastic in the oceans, the Pacific, not the Atlantic. Western nations have strict laws regarding pollution that are actually enforced. Asia has theoretical environmental laws that are not enforced.
China - 8.8 million metric tons
Indonesia - 3.2 million metric tons
Philippines - 1.9 million metric tons
Sri Lanka - 1.6 million metric tons
Thailand - 1 million metric tons
Bangladesh - 0.8 million metric tons
United States - 0.3 million metric tons
Now ask me why I don't care if people in the United States use plastic straws.
Only coastal cities put any plastic in the ocean. People landfill their trash close to their societies because it costs too much to ship it. The United States regulates waste disposal. You are not seeing trucks go to the ocean to dump plastic into it, in the United States at least.
We are constantly being lied to. It is so constant that people don't even ask the simplest questions. Do you really believe that when your trash is picked up, the trash company or city separates the plastic bags and straws and then dumps them in the ocean rather than landfilling them in the bags they came in? How bout this, we are told that oil is a billion old dead dinosaurs. If oil is a billion or 100 million years old, it does not biodegrade. Plastic takes up less space than oil because it is a oil concentrate. Therefore plastic takes up less space than oil in the ground.
Where are the large plastic in the oceans, the Pacific, not the Atlantic. Western nations have strict laws regarding pollution that are actually enforced. Asia has theoretical environmental laws that are not enforced.
Sunday, August 11, 2019
Suspicious suicide of Jeffrey Epstein
Jeffrey Epstein the "multi-millionaire" and or "billionaire" died inside a Manhattan Federal jail awaiting trial. Lets get the basic background.
In 2005 a woman contacted the Palm Beach police claiming Epstein hired underage girls for sex, an investigation ensued and he was charged with procuring underage girls for sex. Eventually he plead guilty to another charge. On July 6, 2016 he was arrested for sex trafficking. On July 23, 2016 Epstein was found on the floor of his cell in the fetal position in the corner with marks around his neck. He was sharing his cell with a ex-policeman charged with murdering four people. The media claimed it was an attempted suicide, his cell mate claimed he found Epstein in that condition and had saved him, which conveniently explained why his dna was on Epstein. Epstein was then placed on suicide watch and placed in a cell by himself.
The procedure for suicide watch at the jail involved 24/7 camera monitoring, you are denied anything that you can hurt yourself with and an officer is responsible for personally checking on you every 15 minutes. On August 9, 2019 thousands of documents were released regarding Epstein and others who were accused of using child prostitutes. At 6:30 this morning, August 10, 2019, Epstein was found dead in what the media said was an apparent suicide. Reports in the media now claim he was taken off of suicide watch and that the cameras had failed.
I have not written about Epstein before because as far as I was concerned he was just another wealthy pederast (it is a better word than pedophile as these people do not love the people they take advantage of). I did write about Jimmy Saville because most people in the US didn't know about him or his ties to the wealthy; but, that was a few years ago. When Epstein tried his first attempt at suicide in the jail I didn't write about it; but, did not believe it to be an attempted suicide. I believe it is very likely his cell mate was either being set up or behind it. Here is what we do know, that cell mate wasn't his cell mate when he did commit "suicide", they had been separated. Remember this, his cell mate claimed he found him that way and was reviving him and afterwards, Epstein never accused his cell mate of anything even though he knew they were not going to be in the same cell again and knowing that he would be in a private cell.
Here is another fact, nobody who knew about this case thought Epstein would ever make it to court. People on the left and right all questioned what happened after the first suicide attempt. Prior to his successful suicide, comedian Jimmy Dore was telling a joke that Hillary Clinton had posted on Twitter that she was saddened by the news of Epstein's suicide next Tuesday. It is even less surprising that he died one day after the documents from his conviction were unsealed and listed numerous powerful people who had slept with underage girls.
The media's response is interesting. When Epstein first got convicted the media tried to draw a connection between Trump and Epstein. They pointed out that in 1997 Trump was photographed next to Epstein at a party at Mar-a-Lago along with hundreds of other Palm Beach millionaires. They then pointed out that Trump had once taken one of Epstein's planes from Florida to New York. They fail to mention that flight logs show President Clinton took over 24 flights with Epstein, even though Clinton claims he only took four. There are penalties for lying on flight logs. Nobody has been charged with any. It should be noted that Trump through Epstein out of Mar-A-Lago prior to Epstein being charged with anything and Clinton became Epstein's friend after. While suspicious the real question is why the corporate media is trying to tie Trump to Epstein and trying to ignore or downplay Bill Clinton. It was the media twisting of the truth that made me pay attention to the case; but, even then I didn't write about it and will waiting for evidence.
Some more odd things. One person stated that many people out on bail who are accused of being a pederast commit suicide, ignoring the fact that Epstein was not out on bail and had been denied it. It is also strange that Epstein said he was Not Guilty in his court filings and was actively working with his attorney. He had even offered 70 million as his bail. It was denied. This is interesting in that he did not attempt to leave the country during his prior case.
While I have written about Pastor Carol Daniels for a decade, I have never pointed a finger at any specific person for good reason, I cannot prove it. I can prove that the junkies didn't do it; but, not who did. Maybe video will show up that shows Epstein killing himself, I will hold my breath. I cannot prove there was foul play in Epstein's case, so I wont. I can say it is weird and deserves to be fully investigated. I can also say, that is standard procedure. I expect no answers in this case, I expect the media to ignore it by Tuesday and move on to Trump's newest tweet. The media has become no more that a presstitute for the oligarchs in this country. It only pushes stories that support the establishment. It supports trade agreements that deny you a say in what happens in government. It supports war, non ending war that these people will not be soldiers in. It supports taking away personal transportation from the average person. It supports a cashless society. It supports censorship of all but approved media.
Children, this post is not about Epstein, it is about the media and how blatantly biased they are, how they are fixated on spinning every story for propaganda. You are witnessing the consolidation of acceptable thought into the hands of a few and those few are paid by the oligarchs. The Klan and Antifa don't even remotely represent 1% of this nation, yet, according to the corporate news they are everywhere. The right wing militias have been infiltrated since the 70s and I know this as fact. My father who was in the federal law enforcement told me this in the 70s.
Here is truth, do with it what you will. The media wants you to fear people you have never met. I am as a white as they come, I burn at the least amount of son. I had plenty of friends who were whatever color you want and since the early the early 70s. I have readers who are black, they never called me racist or wanted me dead because I am white. Look at the number of interracial marriages, it continues to go up. I remember when it was illegal in some states. Is this country more afraid of gays than it was during the AIDS epidemic? Show me a tv show that doesn't have gays and explain why gay marriage is only now allowed. Is this country more biased against women? More women are in college than men. All statistics show that minorities, women, gays and even Muslims are doing better in this country than ever before. Those same statistics show that the wealthy are doing better than ever before and the poor of all are doing worse.
Here is something the media doesn't discuss. Every dollar you spend on illegal aliens is once less dollar for the poor and homeless already here. Every dollar you spend on illegal aliens could spent providing healthcare for poor Americans of all colors and minorities make up a bigger percentage of the poor. I find it disgusting that the same people who want war with Iran complain that Trump didn't kill Iranians. I am not a Trump fan, I am a socialist; but, I am honest. The establishment hated Bernie as much as they hated Trump and hate Tulsi Gabbard, they hate anyone against war and they hate anyone focused on the theft of our economy.
In 2005 a woman contacted the Palm Beach police claiming Epstein hired underage girls for sex, an investigation ensued and he was charged with procuring underage girls for sex. Eventually he plead guilty to another charge. On July 6, 2016 he was arrested for sex trafficking. On July 23, 2016 Epstein was found on the floor of his cell in the fetal position in the corner with marks around his neck. He was sharing his cell with a ex-policeman charged with murdering four people. The media claimed it was an attempted suicide, his cell mate claimed he found Epstein in that condition and had saved him, which conveniently explained why his dna was on Epstein. Epstein was then placed on suicide watch and placed in a cell by himself.
The procedure for suicide watch at the jail involved 24/7 camera monitoring, you are denied anything that you can hurt yourself with and an officer is responsible for personally checking on you every 15 minutes. On August 9, 2019 thousands of documents were released regarding Epstein and others who were accused of using child prostitutes. At 6:30 this morning, August 10, 2019, Epstein was found dead in what the media said was an apparent suicide. Reports in the media now claim he was taken off of suicide watch and that the cameras had failed.
I have not written about Epstein before because as far as I was concerned he was just another wealthy pederast (it is a better word than pedophile as these people do not love the people they take advantage of). I did write about Jimmy Saville because most people in the US didn't know about him or his ties to the wealthy; but, that was a few years ago. When Epstein tried his first attempt at suicide in the jail I didn't write about it; but, did not believe it to be an attempted suicide. I believe it is very likely his cell mate was either being set up or behind it. Here is what we do know, that cell mate wasn't his cell mate when he did commit "suicide", they had been separated. Remember this, his cell mate claimed he found him that way and was reviving him and afterwards, Epstein never accused his cell mate of anything even though he knew they were not going to be in the same cell again and knowing that he would be in a private cell.
Here is another fact, nobody who knew about this case thought Epstein would ever make it to court. People on the left and right all questioned what happened after the first suicide attempt. Prior to his successful suicide, comedian Jimmy Dore was telling a joke that Hillary Clinton had posted on Twitter that she was saddened by the news of Epstein's suicide next Tuesday. It is even less surprising that he died one day after the documents from his conviction were unsealed and listed numerous powerful people who had slept with underage girls.
The media's response is interesting. When Epstein first got convicted the media tried to draw a connection between Trump and Epstein. They pointed out that in 1997 Trump was photographed next to Epstein at a party at Mar-a-Lago along with hundreds of other Palm Beach millionaires. They then pointed out that Trump had once taken one of Epstein's planes from Florida to New York. They fail to mention that flight logs show President Clinton took over 24 flights with Epstein, even though Clinton claims he only took four. There are penalties for lying on flight logs. Nobody has been charged with any. It should be noted that Trump through Epstein out of Mar-A-Lago prior to Epstein being charged with anything and Clinton became Epstein's friend after. While suspicious the real question is why the corporate media is trying to tie Trump to Epstein and trying to ignore or downplay Bill Clinton. It was the media twisting of the truth that made me pay attention to the case; but, even then I didn't write about it and will waiting for evidence.
Some more odd things. One person stated that many people out on bail who are accused of being a pederast commit suicide, ignoring the fact that Epstein was not out on bail and had been denied it. It is also strange that Epstein said he was Not Guilty in his court filings and was actively working with his attorney. He had even offered 70 million as his bail. It was denied. This is interesting in that he did not attempt to leave the country during his prior case.
While I have written about Pastor Carol Daniels for a decade, I have never pointed a finger at any specific person for good reason, I cannot prove it. I can prove that the junkies didn't do it; but, not who did. Maybe video will show up that shows Epstein killing himself, I will hold my breath. I cannot prove there was foul play in Epstein's case, so I wont. I can say it is weird and deserves to be fully investigated. I can also say, that is standard procedure. I expect no answers in this case, I expect the media to ignore it by Tuesday and move on to Trump's newest tweet. The media has become no more that a presstitute for the oligarchs in this country. It only pushes stories that support the establishment. It supports trade agreements that deny you a say in what happens in government. It supports war, non ending war that these people will not be soldiers in. It supports taking away personal transportation from the average person. It supports a cashless society. It supports censorship of all but approved media.
Children, this post is not about Epstein, it is about the media and how blatantly biased they are, how they are fixated on spinning every story for propaganda. You are witnessing the consolidation of acceptable thought into the hands of a few and those few are paid by the oligarchs. The Klan and Antifa don't even remotely represent 1% of this nation, yet, according to the corporate news they are everywhere. The right wing militias have been infiltrated since the 70s and I know this as fact. My father who was in the federal law enforcement told me this in the 70s.
Here is truth, do with it what you will. The media wants you to fear people you have never met. I am as a white as they come, I burn at the least amount of son. I had plenty of friends who were whatever color you want and since the early the early 70s. I have readers who are black, they never called me racist or wanted me dead because I am white. Look at the number of interracial marriages, it continues to go up. I remember when it was illegal in some states. Is this country more afraid of gays than it was during the AIDS epidemic? Show me a tv show that doesn't have gays and explain why gay marriage is only now allowed. Is this country more biased against women? More women are in college than men. All statistics show that minorities, women, gays and even Muslims are doing better in this country than ever before. Those same statistics show that the wealthy are doing better than ever before and the poor of all are doing worse.
Here is something the media doesn't discuss. Every dollar you spend on illegal aliens is once less dollar for the poor and homeless already here. Every dollar you spend on illegal aliens could spent providing healthcare for poor Americans of all colors and minorities make up a bigger percentage of the poor. I find it disgusting that the same people who want war with Iran complain that Trump didn't kill Iranians. I am not a Trump fan, I am a socialist; but, I am honest. The establishment hated Bernie as much as they hated Trump and hate Tulsi Gabbard, they hate anyone against war and they hate anyone focused on the theft of our economy.
Monday, August 5, 2019
Massacres and Prevention?
About 3,000 people died on 9-11 and no guns were used. China had a epidemic of mass murders and none used guns. There are so many ways to kill large numbers of people that don't involve guns and require no expertise. The truth is that the weather kills more people than gun do and cars kill the most. Guns are not hard to make, the original carbine rifle was made by a prisoner in prison from a truck axel. Sulfur, salt peter and charcoal make gun powder. Killing people is relatively easy, the prisoners don't get guns in prison, yet, they manage to kill one another rather easily. Do you know that more people starve to death each year than are shot to death? Massacres pre-date guns. The Pimpernel is an avowed pacifist, I am not promoting guns, I am questioning lies and stupidity.
Guns are not the weapon of mass destruction, consider the Oklahoma bombing, no guns were needed. A single shooter, or two, with guns cannot kill as many people as one person who knows how to make a bomb with common household items. What makes people think about guns different than other killing devices? What drives someone to want to kill strangers in large numbers? It is not a new thing, it predates Trump. Clinton was President when Columbine happened. Johnson was President when the Texas Tower massacre happened.
Why do guns scare the establishment so much. It is because guns allow you to kill a specific person and not because they allow you to kill many. The elites are afraid of being targeted by people who don't believe in collateral damage. By the way, drones kill with bombs, not bullets and the establishment is okay with that. Why is the media more obsessed with the death of a couple dozen people in Texas than with the death of hundreds of thousands in Iraq? If you protest guns; but, not war, what does that say about you?
Point of reference. 53 people were shot over the weekend in Chicago. Last weekend 47 people were shot in Chicago. In fact, over 1400 people have been shot in Chicago so far this year. No manifestos, no political agendas, the vast majority were crime and gang related. Switzerland has more guns per person than the United States; but, very few gun deaths. What causes the difference in shootings? Why are Americans so casual about taking the lives of one another?
While most of the media say we need "reasonable" gun laws, they are short on specifics and what they really mean is to outlaw all guns or require that you register your guns with local police or even a federal registry. Some will say we need more background checks on purchasing a gun; but, every state requires a background check. We heavily regulate who can own certain weapons, like machine guns; but, we don't address guns other than that felons cannot own one.
Guns are not the weapon of mass destruction, consider the Oklahoma bombing, no guns were needed. A single shooter, or two, with guns cannot kill as many people as one person who knows how to make a bomb with common household items. What makes people think about guns different than other killing devices? What drives someone to want to kill strangers in large numbers? It is not a new thing, it predates Trump. Clinton was President when Columbine happened. Johnson was President when the Texas Tower massacre happened.
Why do guns scare the establishment so much. It is because guns allow you to kill a specific person and not because they allow you to kill many. The elites are afraid of being targeted by people who don't believe in collateral damage. By the way, drones kill with bombs, not bullets and the establishment is okay with that. Why is the media more obsessed with the death of a couple dozen people in Texas than with the death of hundreds of thousands in Iraq? If you protest guns; but, not war, what does that say about you?
Point of reference. 53 people were shot over the weekend in Chicago. Last weekend 47 people were shot in Chicago. In fact, over 1400 people have been shot in Chicago so far this year. No manifestos, no political agendas, the vast majority were crime and gang related. Switzerland has more guns per person than the United States; but, very few gun deaths. What causes the difference in shootings? Why are Americans so casual about taking the lives of one another?
While most of the media say we need "reasonable" gun laws, they are short on specifics and what they really mean is to outlaw all guns or require that you register your guns with local police or even a federal registry. Some will say we need more background checks on purchasing a gun; but, every state requires a background check. We heavily regulate who can own certain weapons, like machine guns; but, we don't address guns other than that felons cannot own one.
Tuesday, July 30, 2019
The Dumb Debate in Detroit
Things are not going well for the Democratic party and tonight's debate was no different. If you think that Mueller's testimony was a disaster, this was only a partial disaster. The establishment Democrats want open borders and the left of the party wants universal healthcare but wont say how they would fund it. As a group they all fail to address the issue of outsourcing of jobs or re-establishing Glass Stiegel. They did all agree that Trump is bad. Compare these debates to the 2016 Republican debates and you can see just how boring and lackluster this debate was.
It is highly bizarre to me that there is so little variation among the Democrats. I cannot see anyone running other than Tulsi Gabbard that has a chance to win back midwestern voters. Calling them racist is not going to do it. Not one of the Democratic candidates is offering the Midwest anything to improve their lives. Paying off all student loans and giving reparations for slavery to people who have never been slaves with taxes from people in the Midwest is not going to get their votes. Giving healthcare to illegal aliens and not Americans is not going to get votes in the Midwest.
During the 2016 election I couldn't go a day without having something to write about, it was an exciting primary season, this one is a sleep fest. As for the Democratic party establishment, they really messed up by prohibiting Fox from holding one of the debates. In order to win, you have to win over independents and people who might support your views but voted for Trump in the last election.
Pimpernel spent decades in the political arena and have even written speeches for politicians. I have personally advised politicians on both sides on how to respond to certain things. Where are these politicians advisors? The truth is sad, the establishment Democrats are not following the advice of their advisors, they are doing the bidding of their donors.
The Democratic party abandoned the working class and the unions and are now funded by big tech and the banks. It is a simple fact. They hoped to win via demographics or coastal elites, college students and illegal immigrants; but, they forgot about the electoral college. Hillary Clinton famously said that she won in the places that had the highest GDP. She basically only won on the coasts where people are doing better. They are attempting to win in liberal areas; but, are funded by globalist corporations that are fiscally conservative and against regulation. Kids, oil and vinegar do not mix.
There will be no Republican debates this year, there is nobody of any meaning that is going to run against Trump as a Republican. Jeb is not coming back and Rubio and Cruz and Carson are all aligned with Trump now.
Let me explain how bad this is. My long term readers know I supported Sanders last time and that I did not vote for Trump or Clinton. I have also made it clear that I would never vote for a Clinton or Bush. I was happy that Trump won over Clinton because she would have signed the Trans Pacific Partnership and that would be the beginning of the end of democracy in America. Given the choice, I would probably vote for Tulsi Gabbard; but, the primaries will be long over before they come to my state and she will not make it to the end because her own party and the liberal media are against her. Maybe she can do a Trump and beat the odds; but, she is going to have to attack her own party first to get them to be fair with her. People may have forgotten this but during primary debates Trump was asked if he would support whoever the Republican nominee was and he said he would if he had been treated fairly by the party. Did anyone notice how the Democratic candidates have not been asked the same question?
UPDATE:
I couldn't put words around it; but, here it is. You don't win the Democratic primaries based on what you all agree on. Everyone running is saying Trump is the bad orange man; but, you have over 20 people running. If they all agree Trump is bad, why should anyone choose you over another person who believes the same? The candidates are running on who hates Trump the most and they all hate him completely. We got that, now what makes you better than the other Democratic candidates.
It is highly bizarre to me that there is so little variation among the Democrats. I cannot see anyone running other than Tulsi Gabbard that has a chance to win back midwestern voters. Calling them racist is not going to do it. Not one of the Democratic candidates is offering the Midwest anything to improve their lives. Paying off all student loans and giving reparations for slavery to people who have never been slaves with taxes from people in the Midwest is not going to get their votes. Giving healthcare to illegal aliens and not Americans is not going to get votes in the Midwest.
During the 2016 election I couldn't go a day without having something to write about, it was an exciting primary season, this one is a sleep fest. As for the Democratic party establishment, they really messed up by prohibiting Fox from holding one of the debates. In order to win, you have to win over independents and people who might support your views but voted for Trump in the last election.
Pimpernel spent decades in the political arena and have even written speeches for politicians. I have personally advised politicians on both sides on how to respond to certain things. Where are these politicians advisors? The truth is sad, the establishment Democrats are not following the advice of their advisors, they are doing the bidding of their donors.
The Democratic party abandoned the working class and the unions and are now funded by big tech and the banks. It is a simple fact. They hoped to win via demographics or coastal elites, college students and illegal immigrants; but, they forgot about the electoral college. Hillary Clinton famously said that she won in the places that had the highest GDP. She basically only won on the coasts where people are doing better. They are attempting to win in liberal areas; but, are funded by globalist corporations that are fiscally conservative and against regulation. Kids, oil and vinegar do not mix.
There will be no Republican debates this year, there is nobody of any meaning that is going to run against Trump as a Republican. Jeb is not coming back and Rubio and Cruz and Carson are all aligned with Trump now.
Let me explain how bad this is. My long term readers know I supported Sanders last time and that I did not vote for Trump or Clinton. I have also made it clear that I would never vote for a Clinton or Bush. I was happy that Trump won over Clinton because she would have signed the Trans Pacific Partnership and that would be the beginning of the end of democracy in America. Given the choice, I would probably vote for Tulsi Gabbard; but, the primaries will be long over before they come to my state and she will not make it to the end because her own party and the liberal media are against her. Maybe she can do a Trump and beat the odds; but, she is going to have to attack her own party first to get them to be fair with her. People may have forgotten this but during primary debates Trump was asked if he would support whoever the Republican nominee was and he said he would if he had been treated fairly by the party. Did anyone notice how the Democratic candidates have not been asked the same question?
UPDATE:
I couldn't put words around it; but, here it is. You don't win the Democratic primaries based on what you all agree on. Everyone running is saying Trump is the bad orange man; but, you have over 20 people running. If they all agree Trump is bad, why should anyone choose you over another person who believes the same? The candidates are running on who hates Trump the most and they all hate him completely. We got that, now what makes you better than the other Democratic candidates.
Tuesday, July 9, 2019
Monday, July 1, 2019
Thursday, June 27, 2019
Immigration Laws and Changing Attitudes
Ever since the 2016 primaries there has been a lot of talk about immigration enforcement and immigration policies. At the same time there has been an attempt to muddy the waters around the issues by playing games with the terminology used. People who entered the country without permission used to be called illegal immigrants; but, now they are said to be "undocumented workers" which is slightly misleading. Not all people entering the country illegally come as workers and many entered with documentation but stayed past their visas. Now, the term is changing again and anyone who came from another country is just referred to as an immigrant.
Before getting into why the change on how we view immigrants, we should look at the differences between different groups. A legal immigrant coming here must prove many things about their history and have a valid passport from their country of origin. They have to show they have a sponsor or are self-sufficient (through valid skills or economic assets). People who entered this country legally on a student or visitors visa and stay past their time usually have skills and economic resources. People who enter illegally usually have no skills and little if any money. In fact, people who enter the country legally usually speak English to varying degrees and those entering illegally usually do not.
Historically, since the 1930s there has been almost universal agreement that immigration should be regulated and that illegal immigration was bad for American workers as illegal immigrants would work for lower wages are received no benefits. This made them particularly attractive in the agricultural and construction industries. People such as Caesar Chavez decried and complained about illegal immigration for that reason. In fact I cannot think of a single union that supported illegal immigration. The Democratic party was historically against immigration of all types. As recently as the 1980s and up until 2014, Democrats were against illegal immigration and called for limits on legal immigration. Bill Clinton, George Bush, Obama and Hillary Clinton all called for strengthening the borders and removing illegal immigrants. In fact Obama deported more illegal immigrants than any president in history. So what changed?
What changed was the attitude of the people who own this country and this world. You can call them the .1% or the "elites" or the global establishment. These groups began seeking open borders. While some would like to believe it is "people on the left", they are sadly mistaken. Both the Koch Brothers (severely "right wing") and George Soros (severely "left wing") are in favor of open borders. Strange isn't it?
Last night at the Democratic debate, three of the ten candidates chose to make lengthy statements in Spanish. They sought to garner support of non-citizens apparently. Most on the stage talked about giving healthcare to illegal aliens and other benefits. What was sadly missing from the conversation was a discussion of giving those same benefits to the homeless in this country or even the working poor. Why? Why was there no real discussion about homelessness in this country? Why was only one candidate willing to bring up the fact that in the next few years millions of Americans will have no work because of self driving technologies and Artificial Intelligence?
Many conservatives believe the reason illegal immigration is being pushed so hard is just to get Trump out of office; but, that is not the reason. There is nothing that prevents one from talking about illegal immigration and homelessness. In fact, there are far more illegal aliens than homeless which should make it an easier problem to deal with. It is easier to help 500,000 citizens (over 100,000 of whom are veterans) than 22 million people who came here illegally.
The media asked set up questions regarding immigration; but, failed to ask the simplest and important question. If you are not for open borders, who should be kept out? If you enter this country illegally and we allow you to stay, should you have to give something back such as community service? Should you have to learn the basics of what is legal and illegal in this country? Should you have to learn English? Should you have to keep the government informed as to where you live? Should you have to renounce your foreign citizenship? Why is nobody in the media discussing these basic issues? Keep asking yourself these questions over the next two years.
Monday, June 24, 2019
Google and election interference
This is why I don't use Google and use Yahoo instead.
UPDATE:
So, Project Veritas did a video showing that Google their searches to prevent Trump from getting re-elected. I posted the video above and the source video has been removed from YouTube. Here is a link to a story that discusses what happened and has the video.
Project Veritas - Insider Blows Whistle & Exec Reveals Google Plan to Prevent "Trump situation" in 2020 on Hidden Cam.
Medium - This is not how I expected Monday to go! This is a response by Ms. Gennai.
Sunday, June 23, 2019
"Big Kill" on Netflix
For what it is worth, I was looking for something to watch and ended up watching the western "Big Kill" on Netflix. Mediocre ratings on Rotten Tomatoes; but, I loved it. A guy from "Last Man Standing" was in it and I really like him. It reminded me of old made for TV movies from the 70's, not too deep, not too serious and just a lot of fun. I don't get paid for, or do movie reviews as a rule. Just a shout out to my readers that if they have Netflix, they might give it a try. A great quiet Sunday evening lazy movie night.
Thursday, June 20, 2019
Wednesday, June 19, 2019
Monday, June 17, 2019
The timing of the bs.
So, in the last two months the race for 2020 has begun. LOL. The establishment has decided that they must kill dissenting voices. They regularly attack Tulsi Gabbard (my preferred candidate) and Trump. The same establishment trolls tell you neither has a chance in the polls (worked out last time, rofl). They seek to censor all dissent and tell you that your decisions are because the Russians have confused you while calling for Trump's impeachment. I have told people on social media that that the left can win if they offer the Midwest policies that will help them. I have told in response that the people in the Midwest that voted for Obama are just bigots and racists. Why is it that Democrats cannot offer policies that would help in the Midwest? The average Trump voter in the Midwest wants universal healthcare and an end to war. These people want war, they want war with nations that own their national resources, such as Iran. They want chaos. They live off confusion, emotion and bs.
Thursday, June 13, 2019
Beware Hypocricy
This is just too funny.
The outrage of the day. Trump is asked what he would do if a "foreigner" said they had dirt on an opponent. Hmmm, what if an Australian said they had dirt on an American political campaign? I guess we would have to ask Mr. Downer. These idiots don't understand that it is going to come out that Australia, Italy and England worked to keep Trump out of office. Don't forget Hillary paid foreigners to provide dirt on Trump.
The outrage of the day. Trump is asked what he would do if a "foreigner" said they had dirt on an opponent. Hmmm, what if an Australian said they had dirt on an American political campaign? I guess we would have to ask Mr. Downer. These idiots don't understand that it is going to come out that Australia, Italy and England worked to keep Trump out of office. Don't forget Hillary paid foreigners to provide dirt on Trump.
Wednesday, June 12, 2019
Just a singer
Ask yourself what he is talking about. Read the lyrics and ignore the music. What story is he telling?
I'm just a wandering on the face of this earth
Meeting so many people
Who are trying to be free
And while I'm traveling I hear so many words
Language barriers broken
Now we've found the key
And if you want the wind of change
To blow about you
And you're the only other person to know, don't tell me
I'm just a singer in a rock and roll band.
A thousand pictures can be drawn from one word
Only who is the artist
We got to agree
A thousand miles can lead so many ways
Just to know who is driving
What a help it would be
So if you want this world of yours
To turn about you
And you can see exactly what to do
Please tell me
I'm just a singer in a rock and roll band.
How can we understand
Riots by the people for the people
Who are only destroying themselves
And when you see a frightened
Person who is frightened by the
People who are scorching this earth.
I'm just a wandering on the face of this earth
Meeting so many people
Who are trying to be free
And while I'm traveling I hear so many words
Language barriers broken
Now we've found the key
And if you want the wind of change
To blow about you
And you're the only other person to know, don't tell me
I'm just a singer in a rock and roll band.
How can we understand
Riots by the people for the people
Who are only destroying themselves
And when you see a frightened
Person who is frightened by the
People who are scorching this earth.
Music is the traveller crossing our world
Meeting so many people bridging the seas
I'm just a singer in a rock and roll band.
We're just the singers in a rock and roll band.
I'm just a singer in a rock and roll band...
Sunday, June 9, 2019
Caleb Cain, Censorship and Questions
The New York Times has just published a story about a 26 year old named Caleb Cain who claims that he was brainwashed to become a "alt-right" person by videos on YouTube.
New York Times - The making of a YouTube Radical.
Mr. Cain oddly enough joined YouTube on March 17, 2019 according to has YouTube channel, Faraday Speaks. Now, every YouTube account includes a channel even if you never post a video. My channel says I began using it in 2011. I had used YouTube prior to that but had to join to watch certain videos.
Mr. Cain also began a Twitter account which he apparently joined in January of 2019. Twitter@FaradaySpeaks. where he calls himself "Caleb Cain - Former Alt-Right.
Mr. Cain's channel is connected to four other channels. Three of them are actively anti-alt-right; but, one is bizarre. The channel is called Hans, has 40 subscribers and no content. It looks oddly enough like a drop box, a shared place for hidden comments. Why else would anyone subscribe to a channel with absolutely no content?
On March 21, 2019 Mr. Cain posted his first video. Which I show below.
In the video he claims that in 2014 he was depressed and turned to YouTube for self help videos, found Stephen Molyneux and ended up watching more and more "alt-right" videos leading him down a road to racism and radicalization. Eventually he found a left winger on YouTube and became normal again,
Timing is everything. You see in the last week YouTube has been called on to delete channels by conservatives. The poster boy for this call was of course the Carlos Maza writer for the NBC partly owned Vox publication. Now, right now, the New York Times publishes this major story about how this poor young mad was brainwashed into the alt-right.
Now, point of interest. In the comments section for Mr. Cain's video is a pinned comment from a YouTuber called ContraPoints. The comment was, "thanks and much <333 a="" alt-right="" and="" atalie.="" be="" bias="" cain="" care="" claims="" commented="" comments="" continue="" contrapoints="" cured="" deal="" depression.="" desire="" down.="" everything.="" everything="" for="" found="" have="" he="" here="" his="" hunger="" i="" if="" in="" is="" knowledge.="" let="" love.="" mr.="" much="" my="" of="" on="" one="" owe="" owes="" p="" person="" played="" please="" question="" read="" remember="" responding="" response="" safe.="" see="" sharing="" so="" states="" t="" take="" thank="" that="" the="" they="" this.="" to="" trying="" videos.="" we="" while="" who="" will="" with="" won="" you="">
I recommend you watch Mr. Cain's second video as he gives a little more background.
You will hear him early in saying he is reading from a script. In fact, his whole speech is scripted; but, he has memorized much of it. Hmmm. Heck, he even says at the beginning of the video that has written an article for a major publication.
If you are really interested in who this guy is, there is an interview with him.
YouTube - NonCompete - Farady Speaks Video.
Vox - How YouTube sent one man down an alt-right rabbit hole.
Expect this guys story to change over time. It reminds me of the Jesse Smollett story, something here just aint right.
New York Times - The making of a YouTube Radical.
Mr. Cain oddly enough joined YouTube on March 17, 2019 according to has YouTube channel, Faraday Speaks. Now, every YouTube account includes a channel even if you never post a video. My channel says I began using it in 2011. I had used YouTube prior to that but had to join to watch certain videos.
Mr. Cain also began a Twitter account which he apparently joined in January of 2019. Twitter@FaradaySpeaks. where he calls himself "Caleb Cain - Former Alt-Right.
Mr. Cain's channel is connected to four other channels. Three of them are actively anti-alt-right; but, one is bizarre. The channel is called Hans, has 40 subscribers and no content. It looks oddly enough like a drop box, a shared place for hidden comments. Why else would anyone subscribe to a channel with absolutely no content?
On March 21, 2019 Mr. Cain posted his first video. Which I show below.
In the video he claims that in 2014 he was depressed and turned to YouTube for self help videos, found Stephen Molyneux and ended up watching more and more "alt-right" videos leading him down a road to racism and radicalization. Eventually he found a left winger on YouTube and became normal again,
Timing is everything. You see in the last week YouTube has been called on to delete channels by conservatives. The poster boy for this call was of course the Carlos Maza writer for the NBC partly owned Vox publication. Now, right now, the New York Times publishes this major story about how this poor young mad was brainwashed into the alt-right.
Now, point of interest. In the comments section for Mr. Cain's video is a pinned comment from a YouTuber called ContraPoints. The comment was, "thanks and much <333 a="" alt-right="" and="" atalie.="" be="" bias="" cain="" care="" claims="" commented="" comments="" continue="" contrapoints="" cured="" deal="" depression.="" desire="" down.="" everything.="" everything="" for="" found="" have="" he="" here="" his="" hunger="" i="" if="" in="" is="" knowledge.="" let="" love.="" mr.="" much="" my="" of="" on="" one="" owe="" owes="" p="" person="" played="" please="" question="" read="" remember="" responding="" response="" safe.="" see="" sharing="" so="" states="" t="" take="" thank="" that="" the="" they="" this.="" to="" trying="" videos.="" we="" while="" who="" will="" with="" won="" you="">
I recommend you watch Mr. Cain's second video as he gives a little more background.
You will hear him early in saying he is reading from a script. In fact, his whole speech is scripted; but, he has memorized much of it. Hmmm. Heck, he even says at the beginning of the video that has written an article for a major publication.
If you are really interested in who this guy is, there is an interview with him.
YouTube - NonCompete - Farady Speaks Video.
Vox - How YouTube sent one man down an alt-right rabbit hole.
Expect this guys story to change over time. It reminds me of the Jesse Smollett story, something here just aint right.
Thursday, June 6, 2019
Corporate Censorship
Louder With Crowder
Pimpernel is a big time supporter of free speech, something considered so important that it is the first amendment to our constitution. The courts have put limitations on it historically and rightly so. Libel laws are the best example; but, one can include yelling fire in a theater when there is none. Incitement to violence and putting out certain private information about someone (posting naked pictures of your ex for instance) are also restricted. The limitations on free speech are few in the United States.
While the government is limited in preventing free speech, private companies are not. This leads private companies to limit speech to what is generally accepted. If I believe ignorantly that the earth is flat, should that be restricted? What if I say it as a joke? Freedom of speech means you have a right to be wrong, if you do not then who gets to determine what the truth is? If I have a right to say we should have open borders, do I have a right to say I want the borders controlled?
Well, the big social media companies are restricting these things, especially YouTube. We are headed down a very dangerous path. If these companies can restrict what you say on their platforms, they can also restrict what you say in your e-mails and trust me that is coming too. You might laugh at this thought; but, the tech is the exact same tech. Imagine this situation, a group of neo-Nazis use the internet to create e-mail lists of all their members to send messages to one another to arrange gatherings and spread misinformation about Jews or Blacks, or whoever. What happens if Gmail wants to stop it and uses algorithms to prevent them from having those conversations. Is there a reason that could not happen? The tech is there.
In the past, you could write what you wanted in personal letters, they were protected by the first amendment, not so for e-mails. If we are to have freedom of speech on the internet then the rules must follow the nations rules and in the United States that means freedom of speech.
Algorithms cannot detect comedy or sarcasm. Don Rickles regularly insulted people, it was his act and everyone knew it was just a joke. Will his videos be taken down from YouTube? This is very important, critical to all political speech as by its nature it is divisive, people have different opinions. Should I be allowed to say that I believe in the death penalty, should I be allowed to say I believe abortion should be legal. Both call for taking a human life (DNA defines your species). Should people in Palestine be allowed to post videos calling for the death of Israel? Should Muslims be allowed to call for taking over countries in the middle east? Should the Klan be able to post videos showing what they believe? Should you be able to read Mein Kampf on line? Should you be able to read books written that supported slavery to understand what logic they followed. "Those who don't remember the past are bound to repeat it".
Who should make these determinations and under what rules? For the moment social media platforms are making the rules for you and they are not consistent.
Pimpernel is a big time supporter of free speech, something considered so important that it is the first amendment to our constitution. The courts have put limitations on it historically and rightly so. Libel laws are the best example; but, one can include yelling fire in a theater when there is none. Incitement to violence and putting out certain private information about someone (posting naked pictures of your ex for instance) are also restricted. The limitations on free speech are few in the United States.
While the government is limited in preventing free speech, private companies are not. This leads private companies to limit speech to what is generally accepted. If I believe ignorantly that the earth is flat, should that be restricted? What if I say it as a joke? Freedom of speech means you have a right to be wrong, if you do not then who gets to determine what the truth is? If I have a right to say we should have open borders, do I have a right to say I want the borders controlled?
Well, the big social media companies are restricting these things, especially YouTube. We are headed down a very dangerous path. If these companies can restrict what you say on their platforms, they can also restrict what you say in your e-mails and trust me that is coming too. You might laugh at this thought; but, the tech is the exact same tech. Imagine this situation, a group of neo-Nazis use the internet to create e-mail lists of all their members to send messages to one another to arrange gatherings and spread misinformation about Jews or Blacks, or whoever. What happens if Gmail wants to stop it and uses algorithms to prevent them from having those conversations. Is there a reason that could not happen? The tech is there.
In the past, you could write what you wanted in personal letters, they were protected by the first amendment, not so for e-mails. If we are to have freedom of speech on the internet then the rules must follow the nations rules and in the United States that means freedom of speech.
Algorithms cannot detect comedy or sarcasm. Don Rickles regularly insulted people, it was his act and everyone knew it was just a joke. Will his videos be taken down from YouTube? This is very important, critical to all political speech as by its nature it is divisive, people have different opinions. Should I be allowed to say that I believe in the death penalty, should I be allowed to say I believe abortion should be legal. Both call for taking a human life (DNA defines your species). Should people in Palestine be allowed to post videos calling for the death of Israel? Should Muslims be allowed to call for taking over countries in the middle east? Should the Klan be able to post videos showing what they believe? Should you be able to read Mein Kampf on line? Should you be able to read books written that supported slavery to understand what logic they followed. "Those who don't remember the past are bound to repeat it".
Who should make these determinations and under what rules? For the moment social media platforms are making the rules for you and they are not consistent.
Wednesday, June 5, 2019
Trying Something New - Video of the Day
My first video is going to be from a progressive liberal comedian who still manages to tell the truth.
Jimmy Dore
Jimmy Dore
Tuesday, May 28, 2019
What The Powerful Have As Priorities
Bilderberg 2019 Agenda.
1. A Stable Strategic Order
2. What Next For Europe
3. Climate Change and Sustainability
4. China
5. Russia
6. The Future of Capitalism
7. Brexit
8. The Ethics of Artificial Intelligence
9. The Weaponization of Social Media
10. The Importance of Space
11. Cyber Threats
The List of Attendees.
It includes representatives of the Washington Post, New York Times, Google, Warner Media and others in media, none of whom report on what is discussed and goes on. I should also note that this is the first time in 10 years that climate change made the agenda.
1. A Stable Strategic Order
2. What Next For Europe
3. Climate Change and Sustainability
4. China
5. Russia
6. The Future of Capitalism
7. Brexit
8. The Ethics of Artificial Intelligence
9. The Weaponization of Social Media
10. The Importance of Space
11. Cyber Threats
The List of Attendees.
It includes representatives of the Washington Post, New York Times, Google, Warner Media and others in media, none of whom report on what is discussed and goes on. I should also note that this is the first time in 10 years that climate change made the agenda.
Monday, May 27, 2019
Purely Political Impeachment.
On a daily basis the corporate media discusses the need to impeach Trump, for what is not clear. I want to go back to how this began to show that this is purely political. Before Trump had even secured the nomination, the elites were saying he should be impeached if elected.
Politico - Could Trump Be Impeached Shortly After He Takes Office?
Perhaps people have forgotten this video calling for the electoral college to ignore the election and just vote for whoever they want.
The Politico article went so far as to say that Trump was going to round up Muslims and put them in concentration camps. The supposedly "liberal" corporate media calls for him to attack Iran, North Korea and Venezuela daily. The same media calls for us to stop enforcing immigration laws when just a few years ago the same ones called for building a wall or other type of barrier. We had to endure months of the media calling for him to be impeached for sleeping with a porn star once.
One of Trump's first acts was to pull out of the TPP, a trade agreement that would have let private courts to be used so that companies could sue nations who had laws that they did not like.
WPR - Why Trump's Exit From the Paris Agreement Could Start a Trade War.
The fact is that while the TPP allowed nations to set their own CO2 limits voluntarily, the TPP was going to make those choices mandatory and both were going to start serious enforcement in 2030.
Politico - Could Trump Be Impeached Shortly After He Takes Office?
Perhaps people have forgotten this video calling for the electoral college to ignore the election and just vote for whoever they want.
The Politico article went so far as to say that Trump was going to round up Muslims and put them in concentration camps. The supposedly "liberal" corporate media calls for him to attack Iran, North Korea and Venezuela daily. The same media calls for us to stop enforcing immigration laws when just a few years ago the same ones called for building a wall or other type of barrier. We had to endure months of the media calling for him to be impeached for sleeping with a porn star once.
One of Trump's first acts was to pull out of the TPP, a trade agreement that would have let private courts to be used so that companies could sue nations who had laws that they did not like.
WPR - Why Trump's Exit From the Paris Agreement Could Start a Trade War.
The fact is that while the TPP allowed nations to set their own CO2 limits voluntarily, the TPP was going to make those choices mandatory and both were going to start serious enforcement in 2030.
Thursday, May 23, 2019
China, Climate and the Paris Accord
We are being told contradictory things. We are told the Paris Climate Accord will save our planet. We are also told that if we don't stabilize CO2 emissions by 2030 that the world will be doomed by 2050. We are told this by the exact same people; but, the facts are a little different.
The human activity caused CO2 was 37,077,404 gigatons in 2017. China produced 10,877,218 of those emissions or roughly slightly more than 1/4. The United States produced 5,107,393 of them. Australia produced 402,253 of them. China has been praised for taking a leadership role in the Paris Accord after the United States pulled out of the agreement. At the same time, China plans of increasing emissions by 100% by 2030, much of it from burning coal. By the way, since 2005, the United States has reduced it's emissions by about 1/6th.
A video showing the changes by year.
During the recent elections is Australia, their "Labor" party called for Australia to reduce their emissions by 45%. That wouldn't even make a dent in total emissions with China increasing their by 100%. This should make you wonder why the United Nations doesn't discuss this in their climate reports. This should make you ask why the media doesn't discuss it. In fact, 66% of the electrical energy in China comes from coal burning which is more than double the percentage coming from coal in the United States and China will be doubling the number of coal powered plants between now and 2030.
If every country in the world, except China, kept steady at their carbon emissions, we would still see a 25% increase in total emissions due to China alone. Include India in that equation and we are easily looking at a 35% increase overall.
Wikipedia - List of Countries by Carbon Emissions.
Why are we moving manufacturing to the country that is the biggest user of coal and producer of CO2 if we are concerned about CO2 emissions? Why don't the climate scientists, the media pundits or Bill Nye discuss this? Why don't climate scientists use the scientific method and prove their theories using experiments?
Time - It Didn't Take Long For China to Fill America's Shoes On Climate Change. Reads like propaganda to me and leaves out the facts I just mentioned.
National Review - The Key Charade of the Paris Agreement.
Western countries companies will tell you how they have reduced their CO2 emissions, their carbon footprint when in fact all they have done is outsource the emissions to China. You are told that if you don't eat meat one day a week, you will save the world; but, that is not even remotely going to offset China doubling their emissions.
People in the western world are being lied to. You are being told that if you live with less, the world will be saved while jobs and industry are being sent to the biggest polluters resulting in a net increase in CO2 which is in fact harmless.
The human activity caused CO2 was 37,077,404 gigatons in 2017. China produced 10,877,218 of those emissions or roughly slightly more than 1/4. The United States produced 5,107,393 of them. Australia produced 402,253 of them. China has been praised for taking a leadership role in the Paris Accord after the United States pulled out of the agreement. At the same time, China plans of increasing emissions by 100% by 2030, much of it from burning coal. By the way, since 2005, the United States has reduced it's emissions by about 1/6th.
A video showing the changes by year.
During the recent elections is Australia, their "Labor" party called for Australia to reduce their emissions by 45%. That wouldn't even make a dent in total emissions with China increasing their by 100%. This should make you wonder why the United Nations doesn't discuss this in their climate reports. This should make you ask why the media doesn't discuss it. In fact, 66% of the electrical energy in China comes from coal burning which is more than double the percentage coming from coal in the United States and China will be doubling the number of coal powered plants between now and 2030.
If every country in the world, except China, kept steady at their carbon emissions, we would still see a 25% increase in total emissions due to China alone. Include India in that equation and we are easily looking at a 35% increase overall.
Wikipedia - List of Countries by Carbon Emissions.
Why are we moving manufacturing to the country that is the biggest user of coal and producer of CO2 if we are concerned about CO2 emissions? Why don't the climate scientists, the media pundits or Bill Nye discuss this? Why don't climate scientists use the scientific method and prove their theories using experiments?
Time - It Didn't Take Long For China to Fill America's Shoes On Climate Change. Reads like propaganda to me and leaves out the facts I just mentioned.
National Review - The Key Charade of the Paris Agreement.
Western countries companies will tell you how they have reduced their CO2 emissions, their carbon footprint when in fact all they have done is outsource the emissions to China. You are told that if you don't eat meat one day a week, you will save the world; but, that is not even remotely going to offset China doubling their emissions.
People in the western world are being lied to. You are being told that if you live with less, the world will be saved while jobs and industry are being sent to the biggest polluters resulting in a net increase in CO2 which is in fact harmless.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)