Friday, July 21, 2017

Just some quick news

MSN - CNBC - This is your captain retiring...world faces pilot shortage. This article is a lie. We could easily train enough people to be pilots which is a good paying job.

CBS - Boeing To Test Self-Flying Planes.  It is cheaper to build self flying planes.

VICE - The Mayor Who Loved China. This is the same mayor who wants to build a 10 story tall Buddha in the middle of the Mojave desert.

Wednesday, July 19, 2017

I Will Write Again

Sorry guys but I haven't seen anything worth writing about. I have however watched some really interesting YouTube videos and thought I might post one of them.


Tuesday, July 11, 2017

Hypocrites and Donald Trump Jr.

So the new line of garbage is that Donald Trump Jr. met with a Russian and that the Russian offered to give information about how Hillary was getting money from Russians or some such garbage. Well, Hillary did get money from Russian bankers, they paid Bill a half million dollars to give in speech in Russia after she approved the deal where 20% of U.S, Uranium is now owned by Russia. The Huffington Post posted this.

Huffington Post - Exactly Why Donald Trump Jr.’s Meeting With A Russian Lawyer Could Be Illegal.

The article claims that it is illegal for anyone to get anything from a foreigner that might be useful to a candidate. It claims that a Russian offered Donald Trump Jr information about Hillary and that could be a crime. Lets break this down. Firstly, they misstate the law, information is not a brief. The law is about money or promises of money or something else of similar nature. Secondly, you can refuse to take money but not hear someone. Thirdly, there is no claim that Donald Jr used anything was told, in fact, the campaign for his father never claimed Hillary was doing what the Russian who spoke to Donald Jr claimed she was. Finally, and the real point of this post, the DNC hired an English ex spy to write a dossier to hurt Trump, you know the one that claimed Trump had prostitutes piss on a bed that the Obamas had slept in. That is the hypocritical part.

Wednesday, July 5, 2017

CNN and Abuse of Power


"CNN is not publishing “HanA**holeSolo’s” name because he is a private citizen who has issued an extensive statement of apology, showed his remorse by saying he has taken down all his offending posts, and because he said he is not going to repeat this ugly behavior on social media again. In addition, he said his statement could serve as an example to others not to do the same."
"CNN reserves the right to publish his identity should any of that change."

Someone of Reddit modified a video of Trump at a wrestling match smacking the owner of the wrestling channel and put "CNN" over Vince McMahan's face. Trump retweeted it and hilarity ensued as the corporate media flipped out and claimed it could endanger reporters lives. CNN tracked down the person who made the video and he apologized. CNN said he sounded nervous. CNN then discussed exposing his identity to the world and the quote from above is what CNN wrote and posted.

CNN and the others in corporate media do not understand social media, they are only compounding their arrogance and lies for all to see. It is funny that the corporate media decries attacks on free speech while at the same time threatening and attacking people for exercising free speech on social media. If what CNN did was meant to threaten others, it backfired and the anti-CNN memes are now flowing at lightening speed. They may not like it; but, the corporate media no longer controls the narrative.

Sunday, July 2, 2017

Trump, CNN and a Wrestling Video


Someone on Reddit made the video above and President Trump posted a copy of it on Twitter. The corporate media's response was to say that Trump is calling for violence on reporters. Wait, this is the same media that called for Trump's impeachment prior to the election actually being held. This is the same media that defended Kathy Griffin showing Trump's decapitated head as a bad joke. This is the same media that said the voters were stupid and the same media that supported a play about Ceaser which ends with Trump being stabbed to death. Nobody cares what the media thinks anymore.

This is how the media reacted to Trump's winning the presidency. Why would we expect them to ever be honest or reasonable about Trump.


Here is the bottom line issue. If you continually attack someone, expect them to respond. Pretty simple. Between May and June the mainstream corporate media spent 353 minutes attacking Trump for a false Russia collusion claim that they have zero evidence of. This same media spent only 1 minute discussing tax reform, 3 minutes discussing infrastructure, 5 minutes discussing the economy and jobs and 17 minutes discussing healthcare. We have all seen Trump be attacked for just stupid stuff like how many scoops of ice cream he has at dinner or that he likes his steaks well done and the media is offended that he fights back and expects you to be upset by it too. Look at the comments online, real people are not upset, real people think it is hilarious.

Not Writing, Just Thinking

Sorry kids, the Pimpernel hasn't felt something worthy of writing about for a few days. I will say this much, I am still thinking about making YouTube videos. I feel more people might hear what I have to say and feel I don't get enough comments here. I spoke to my brother about that tonight. He said that he didn't think my blog seemed to invite comments. He seems to believe that my posts don't really ask questions; but, rather answer them. I don't know what I think about that.

I guess it is like when I was preaching. If someone had asked me why they should believe in God, I would have told them that I don't care what you believe in. It is not my job to tell you what to believe in, it is my job to tell you what I believe in. I want you to think about that for a second.

I write to tell others what I see. I am totally fine with people not seeing the same thing and ignoring me or even questioning me. It is not my job to convince anyone of anything, the bible says that we should have an answer for the hope that lies within us. I have answer for why I believe what I believe.

I don't make money from this and have decided if I would monetize a YouTube video, if I choose to make them; but, I am not monetizing this blog and never have. I have written thousands of posts for almost a decade and have never made a penny. I deeply feel for the Daniels family; but, I have made it very clear I never thought they would ever read my stuff and did not write about the case for any personal reason, I just thought there was too many garbage answers being given. I absolutely wish someone with more attention and viewership would talk about the case. I actually reached out to a YouTuber, who has many more views than I, about the case, someone that talks about such things and asked them to do a video about the case. They have not and did not respond to me, I will not mention who it was.

I want to know my readers opinions. Should I start doing YouTube videos? I would have more viewers; but, would video of me talking about these things detract from the written word? Would the people that read my writing like to hear my voice, I won't show my face, I'm just not that pretty. I have been told that I write the way I sound in person. I can't judge that. You decide. NO, you give your opinion, I decide what I do. Peace and thanks for caring enough to keep reading my nonsense.

Tuesday, June 20, 2017

The Illusion of White Privilege

Let's start with a joke. A Jew, a black man and an Irishman are all being put to death on crosses and they begin arguing over who is being better treated and why. Now that is the definition of stupid.

I have previously stated that I am Irish, well, American of Irish descent. I have also stated that the English starved one fourth of us to death with the Irish famine. That included people in my family. How many people starved their slaves to death? Not to many, they saw it as the same as starving their horses to death. Slave owners saw their slaves as their property. The Irish had no value to the English at all. I want you to take a moment and think about that, it is not the point I am going to make but is in and of itself something to consider. You see it is about human value.

When I was young I resented the English as I learned of what they had done and were still doing to my nationality. I was about 11 when Bloody Sunday happened. You can look it up or just listen to U2. I heard how the news spun it all and watched as Britain justified it. I saw the propaganda machine at work. I felt a quiet anger as my anger usually is. Anger makes me contemplative and strategic, it is my warning bell to look deeper and find my opponents weakness. I began asking myself what would be acceptable responses to the English by the Irish Republican Army and violence seemed to make sense. It is the simplest of questions, is it okay for the oppressed to kill their oppressor. A simple question that misses the moral issue while making you think it nails it; but that is not the point of this post either.

Lets look at the life of the average Englishman. Is he doing that well? How has he been treated historically. Ever see Braveheart?  The English monarchy treated nations as slaves to the king including their own. The owners of this world do not see color and they don't see sex and they don't see age, they see slaves and competitors for owning the slaves. Should I complain about English privilege?

Define privilege. It means to get a step up on others. It means that someone starts the game with a bigger advantage. Now who should the person given no advantage blame? The person who was started one step ahead, two steps ahead or a thousand steps ahead? Divide and conquer means starting one group in front of another while you are a thousand steps ahead. You get them to righteously fight amongst each other. I have described how musical chairs is the same thing. While 99% of you fight over the increasingly diminishing number of chairs, I take them all but one so you fight each other over the one last chair while I have the rest.

I could have used male privilege as my example or any other privilege you believe exists in a bigoted (the word means universal and generalized, attributing a common thing to a group) way. What is the greatest privilege in the world? What can you be born into that will give you more advantage from the start till the end of life? I think I know the answer and I think the answer is wealth. Beauty and strength can be taken in a moment as can fame; but, money can empower the ugliest, meanest, weakest and most corrupt person in the world for life and beyond. Money is the one thing the world makes sure can be passed on to your children.

UPDATE AND A COMMENT RESPONSE:

I received a comment to this post which you can read in the comment section. The response included a link to a video which I have watched. I am not impressed by the video as it fails to meet certain basic requirements. Lets start with looking at the actual law and not just someone's comments on it.

Legislative Assembly of Ontario - Bill 89, Supporting Children, Youth and Families Act, 2017.

The video claims that Canada passed the law to support gender fluidity and multiculturalism. That is not true. In fact, Canada has had a problem for a long time. Canada used to remove native children from their homes and send them to boarding schools to teach them to be more like Canadians.


If you read the actual bill and know Canadian history you come to understand that they are trying to undue a history of oppression of native Canadian Indians. Here is a quote from the actual law, "One of the additional purposes in the current Act is to recognize that services to Indian and native children and families should be provided in a manner that recognizes their culture, heritage and traditions, and the concept of the extended family." The truth is that the law is aimed at foster care and adoption primarily. The people that made the video in the comment below (click on the word comments at the bottom of this post to read it and see the video) are right wing extremists, I looked at their other videos. The rumour is wrong, it is not illegal to call your children son or daughter in Canada. 

As for the case mentioned in the comment video, here is the actual document submitted by the family to the court.

FRANCES BAARS and DEREK BAARS vs THE CHILDREN’S AID SOCIETY OF HAMILTON.  

Two girls were put in foster care while waiting to be reunited with their biological family. Mr. Baars was working on becoming a minister and did not believe in holidays. Imagine having a Foster family that will not allow you to celebrate your birthday because they are Jehovah's witnesses. Here is an actual quote of what the Baars claimed, "Ms. Lindsay’s comments did not relate to any actual situations we were facing as foster parents.  We had not interacted with any prospective adoptive couples, nor would we be doing so, because the plan with our foster girls was that they would be reunited with their biological family. We repeatedly protested this offensive allegation.  We assured Ms. Lindsay that we would treat any same-sex adoptive parents as people worthy of dignity and respect.  Yet, Ms. Lindsay, without any factual basis or grounding, persisted in telling us that because of our religious faith, we would discriminate against same-sex couples.  Ms. Lindsay told us that she intended to prevent us from ever encountering a same sex couple, and that she intended to close our foster home."

The couple were responsible for meeting with prospective adoptive parents and refused to do so according to their own words. The case had nothing to do with sexual orientation, it had to do with the responsibility of foster parents and they refused to do their job. This case also predates the new law.