Wednesday, March 22, 2017

Some Clarity on Reality the Media Intentionally Confuses

The mass media is basically propaganda. It is a tool of global corporations and the interests of their owners to influence public policy and elections. Currently the corporate media is just involved in spin and propaganda. How dishonest is the media, well we know that Donna Brazile, the head of the DNC, gave debate questions to Hillary Clinton while working for CNN. and that other reporters asked Clinton's people if they wanted to edit or change their stories. While that is not illegal, it is certainly dishonest and is a form of election tampering; but, nobody seems to care.

The Trump Russia Connection - Corporatists Politicians on the left are attempting to claim that there was improper collusion between Trump and Putin. The media claims that if Trump's team ever spoke to anyone to Russia some law was violated. This is simply not true. The truth is that politicians regularly meet with foreign officials. I personally have met with government representatives from China, Israel, Singapore and other nations while working for the government. The media often discusses how "Russia hacked the election without ever defining hacking. Lets talk about that for a minute.

The term hacking is when you go online and "hack" into someone else's account. To hack an election would therefore be to hack the voting machines and according to the 50 states involved and our intelligence agencies, NO voting machines were hacked. This was further evidenced by the recounts which found no hacking. What does this mean, it means the election was NOT hacked. Now some have claimed that because RT (Russia's version of BBC America) spoke positively about Trump as compared to Clinton that this somehow was illegal or improper. IT IS NOT. In fact the BBC did the opposite, disparaging Trump and praising Clinton. Foreign countries have concerns over American policies.

Another approach the media has taken is to claim that Trump has a Russia connection because he sold units in his building to Russians. What a shock. People from all over the world bought properties in Trump's properties. That is how developers make their money, by selling properties and that is also not illegal or suspicious. The truth is that Trump has NO properties in Russia.

The whole narrative is garbage. As for claims that Russia hacked the DNC servers, also garbage. Lets start with the fact that the DNC has refused to turn over their servers to the FBI to even be examined. This is an important point, how can the media make claims without any proof only the self serving statements by a company that worked for the DNC?

Did Obama Wiretap Trump Tower? - So President Trump tweeted that Obama had Trump tower wiretapped. The media prefers to play verbiage games rather than address the issue. Lets start with this point, after the election President Obama came out and instructed the intelligence agencies to investigate any Trump Russia connections and any Russian influence on the election. He also stated he wanted the report prior to his leaving office.

Many in the media have claimed that Trump was not "wiretapped" and while this is technically true it is also insincere. Phones are not technically "wiretapped" this is because cell phones are instead intercepted as they are transmitted over the airwaves and are not carried over physical telephone lines anymore.

So what do we now know. We know that conversations inside Trump Tower were recorded by the government under Obama. We know that there are transcripts and recordings of some of those conversations and we know that it is illegal to record said conversations without a warrant or permission from a FISA court. The defense used by the media to this is to say that the recordings were "incidental" to other investigations. Huh? We committed surveillance illegally on Americans in America; but, it was an accident. That is patently stupid. It also came out today that Trump himself was recorded during this surveillance; but, again that seems to have been another accident. Who buys this garbage?

Whether you like Trump or hate him, we should not accept what the media spins. I will say it again. Six companies own 90% of all the mas media in the United States. We do not have an independent media, we have a corporate controlled media that is globalist and represents globalist rather than American interests. We need to break up the big media giants using anti-trust laws so that a variety of voices can be heard.

You Have To Keep an Eye on Politicians Making Investing Decisions

We are continuing to see a couple hundred views per day. I do hope that those who enjoy my ramblings would be kind enough to send others here to check out the site. I am currently considering posting on YouTube. I would probably make videos with no pictures of me, just illustrative pictures and a voice recording.

I don't have a problem with public speaking, I am just not sure if I want my face on the internet. The truth is that blogging began dying out just as I started this blog. The chance of getting heard is greater on YouTube than it is on blogger. Two things I do not like about vlogging are the facts that it forces one to act faster and it's focus on images. I prefer the written word; but, if the words are not heard it does not matter and format determines distribution. I don't monetize this site, it pays nothing; but, being more widely distributed would be nice. I seek to cause conversation, not agreement.

Let's talk about pensions, how you are played and how money is stolen from others because of you. That is a head scratcher isn't it. Here is an article, you have to read it to get the joke.

The Mercury News - U.S.-Mexico border wall fight: California considers divesting from companies involved in the project.  The Mercury News is the newspaper for San Jose, a very liberal tech area. People in that area are really in favor of immigration, especially tech people, it keeps wages down. The article talks about how the state legislature wants to make a law telling the pension funds that they cannot invest in any company that helps build the wall between the United States and Canada.

While you ponder how you feel about the wall, you miss the point. While you ponder whether people should or should not buy stock in companies that you think should change their policies or who they contract with. While you ponder these things that are irrelevant, you miss the point. You miss the trick, start by knowing politicians are fraudsters and everything they say is for another reason, their priorities are not what you think, their priorities are them.

The pension fund in question is not owned by the state, it is owned by the people that have paid into the pension, the pensioners. The state does NOT own the pension, it is not their money. A pension is like a bank account, it is forced savings by you and for you in lieu of getting paid more money now. Politicians in California want to tell the pension fund where they can and cannot invest; but, are the willing to pay the pension fund if it loses money because of these investments? NO, they are not. Remember how we have been told every public pension in the country is bankrupt, they are not, now the politicians want to force investment decisions that might hurt the pensions even more with the state being responsible. If the state dictates how the pensions invest, the state takes on legal responsibility for the pensions wins and losses.

The game you are witnessing is not about border walls, it is not about Trump, it is about stealing pension money, directing where it goes and being paid for such help. I have not written about pensions in a while and some of my newer readers may not understand what I am talking about. For them, find the tag at the bottom of this post which says "pension fraud", if you click it you should see all the other posts about this subject. Basically, everything you believe about the state of public pensions is a lie, they are in a great place. I know that is hard to believe; but, remember the media lies to take care of corporate interests. Read the posts.

Pension are being robbed because that is where the money is in the eyes of Wall Street. Thieves do not rob Fort Know, they rob the local bank that is not as savvy or well protected. That is the reason the biggest crooks in the past 20 years are stealing from pensions and 401k's. Read the posts about Elliot Broidy and the CIM Group, read the posts and understand that all the politicians involved benefited from helping developers in their cities.

I have noticed that the new readers are focused on politics. the pension fraud threads are politics and money and propaganda.