Friday, August 18, 2017

Pastor Carol Daniels, a Grand Jury and Someone Watching the Case

A few months ago a grand jury was asked to look into the Pastor Carol Daniels case. Previously they had put a retired detective on the case as basically a help you out type of consulting job. Putting a retired guy on the case is what you do when you have a retired friend that needs a couple of bucks and need someone to babysit a cold case that you think you cannot solve. My dad was a cop before I was even born. My dad was a famous law enforcement officer my whole life and is even famous today and he taught me this garbage since I was elementary school. I know the law to, I have a doctorate in it. That grand jury was supposed to kill this case and blame it on the dead dealer; but, they didn't. They didn't because it wasn't that drug dealer, if that is in fact what she was. They wanted to blame the dead girl and I wrote that on this blog at that time.

Here is a stone cold fact, the murderer entered through the back door. The police had video of the front door. The police removed and saved to evidence the back door. That is a fact. There are other facts that I have recited over the years and things that can actually be proven. I personally have stated that I have told the OSBI who I am and unless they are the worst police unit in the United States, they have checked me out.

This is an ugly case for the OSBI and they still have missed the obvious. If they had found tire marks behind the church, they would know what the killer drove; but, the killer did not drive there, they walked there. It was dirt behind the church, they knew the killer entered and left through the back, they should have print mark casts from the back of the church and I don't think they do. I think the local cops screwed up the crime scene and that is understandable. Small town cops are not trained in complicated and rare murders. The Kansas City police royally messed up and screwed up the BTK investigation for 40 years.

The grand jury didn't end up blaming the supposed drug dealer because they knew they were going to get called out. I have told people to NOT speculate on specific people being involved in this murder to anyone other than the police. Online speculation is horrifically stupid. You don't ever publicly announce who you suspect until they arrest them or you are warning them.

I recently came across a blog that is really interested in crime.

The Works of KD Burr - UPDATE: The Pastor Carol Daniels Case

There is a line in the post that I believe is referencing me, it says, "One online crime enthusiast, who has religiously followed the case, quipped: "blaming the murder on a dead woman would wrap this up nicely for them [OSBI]." Just to be clear, I am not a "crime enthusiast" if you are referencing me. I detest criminal behavior. In fact, I have requested that someone much more viewed than my pitiful blog investigate and write about just so the family would know that people still cared. I have told the family that I am not a wonderful person and deserve no credit for anything other than my selfish interest in talking about the world I witness. It was nothing personal from me.

The person attached to the linked blog claims to be a writer of crime stories based on true events. If they can show me that they care about the family and if the family approves, I would talk to this person just to get the story heard by more and push the OSBI to take a more serious look even after all of these years.

This case was not closed by the grand jury. If I have done anything that played a role in that then I am glad and my writing was not in vain. I have said this before and I will say it again. I have done nothing other than talk about things I see. That is the only point of my blog at this time. My prayers and thoughts always go out to the family and this case has effected me though I never intended it to. I feel a connection to the family and if and when the murderer is ever caught, I will drive to Oklahoma to meet the family and tell them that she and God would expect all to forgive all sins. I believe they would and do.

K.D., hi honey. You are a pretty young woman who wants to write crime novels. Yeah, I checked you out. You tell me what you have to offer to the family and I will tell you what I have to offer to you, even things I did not publish; but, you first prove you actually care about the family and not about the crime. I have gone after Pastor Daniels church for wanting to outlaw homosexuality. I am not that nice, you better be able to prove that you are nice or you get nothing from me, ever.

Wednesday, August 16, 2017

Short Post, I am Heartbroken

On my first day of sixth grade, in a new school and living in a new place, one of my fellow students decided he wanted to fight the new kid, me. After school had ended we met at an adjacent vacant lot. Many of the other students followed us to watch the fight. I had no idea why this guy wanted to fight me, I didn't know him and knew nothing about him; but, he wanted to prove something to someone.

I was shocked that so many people wanted to stay after school to watch two kids fight and that none cared what the reason was. As I walked to the empty lot I told all those following that I thought they were sick for wanting to watch two children fight. I think that only solidified why the love of my life fell in love with me who I had only met that same day and in that same class. My first day in sixth grade was met with one woman who fell in love with me, the same woman who I fell in love with and one young man who wanted to beat me up just for being me.

A bunch of jerks who claim to be Nazis and Klansmen decided to piss off a bunch of people who believe they are communists and anti-fascists. The media cheers one side on, it doesn't really matter which. What does it matter which side you choose in a fight, the problem is when you seek fights. The problem is when you seek bloodshed and hate. Hate for anyone is evil.

You know what I expect from "thought leaders"? I expect them to teach tolerance and mercy and love and forgiveness, not hate and violence. Not on any side, because the sides are love and hate in the end and anyone who teaches hate creates their own hell. Hate is the world they will live in if it is the only world they create to live in. That breaks my heart.


Sorry, I left out something you are probably asking. Yes, I won the fight. I had him on the ground in a choke hold. He through a few punches that I easily blocked, I waited for him to expend that early energy and then I jumped him and put him down and in a choke hold. I put him in a choke hold and asked him to stop and if he was done. I don't think I have ever thrown the first punch in my life and if I did, I don't remember and the only person that could correct me is probably my brother. If anyone could remind me of something like that, it would be from when I was very young and it would be my brother.

Violence in response to hate is worse than hate, it is hate moved to action. It is the physical manifestation of evil in our hearts. I don't care what the reason is.

Why Doesn't the Corporate Media Denounce all Violence

I have been writing this blog for over 7 years and I dare anyone to show me where I have posted anything racist. What you will find is multiple times when I have mentioned that I am a pacifist. I also openly express my belief that Israel has a right to exist. Yet, if I say anything that defends Trump supporters there will be those who assume that I am a bad right winger which is funny seeing as how I also openly call out our corporate leaders who pay off politicians to destroy the middle and working classes.

After Charlottesville the media and many politicians claimed Trump was a racist because he called out all sides that engaged in violence. I guess this means that Jesus was a racist too. Let's be honest and admit that for about a year and a half left leaning people have been causing riots and using violence with the media not condemning them. When Milo Yiannopolus was about to give a speech in Berkley, "Antifa" and others on the left started a riot to prevent him from speaking and the media seemed to blame him rather than those who actually committed the vandalism. When these same people attacked people for attending Trump rallies, the media sought to blame Trump rather than the people who actually committed the acts of violence.

Charlottesville began when people started calling for the removal of a statue of Robert E. Lee. Lee is not a simple character, in fact he opposed secession from the union. Did you know that before they brought black slaves to England they still killed the poor for fishing in the kings lakes? Before the English oligarchy took control of Ireland, they abused their own poor. Long before they abused blacks, they abused the Irish. That is a historical fact. Color does not matter, the powerful abuse the weak. Should we fight over who should be the weakest?

What if, like the corporate media, we argue over who should have the right to abuse us, the left or the right? Who should be able to control what we say and our thoughts? Nazi's or anarchists? Why are people arguing over who has the right to use violence when none do?

God is none to happy with people who say that violence is right. Thou shalt not kill is actually one of the ten commandments. Love God with all your heart and your neighbor as yourself is how Jesus summarized the commandments. Why is the media arguing over who to hate and who we can abuse and restrict speech from?

Monday, August 14, 2017

Charlottesville and the Spiritual War

Fox - Maxine Waters Blames Trump for White Nationalist Riots: Your Side, Not Many Sides.

Fox- Charlottesville white nationalist rally blamed for 3 deaths, dozens of injuries.

SFGate - David Duke Blasts Trump’s Call for Unity: ‘It Was White Americans Who Put You in the Presidency

I don't care much for the corporate mainstream media. They tend to spin everything to manipulate opinion and emotions rather than present facts. Lets look at Charlottesville and what we do know. Firstly, there was a movement to remove a confederate monument. In response there was a rally to call for keeping it. The rally was called off by the city before it even started even though they had obtained a permit for the rally. After it was called off someone (we are being told it was a 20 year old man who had racist beliefs) drove his car into a crowd of people headed to protest the rally that had already been called off. Somewhere around 20 people were injured by the car and one has died. Two police officers also died when their helicopter crashed though we don't know what caused it to crash.

There are many valid issues raised by this event. Should we remove all evidence of slavery in America? Should we remove statues of Jefferson because he owned slaves? Should we remove all evidence of the civil war? Should we ignore the right of assembly and free speech?

Now there were people protesting to keep the statue who believe the south had a right to be it's own nation and leave the United States (that right however cannot be found in the Constitution except by amending it). Also included in this rally were a number of Neo-Nazis and Klansmen. While I personally find these groups disgusting, do they still have a right to express their support for keeping the statue?

When Black Lives Matter held protests where some called for killing cops, does that mean everyone who attended the rally's felt the same way? No, in fact the media was quick to point out that it was not the official position of the formal group. This is not much different.

We can look at all the separate issues; but, in the end it is an isolated situation. The media would like to tell you that racism is growing and that these groups are growing; but, the reality is that they are dying off and have been nothing but a joke for decades. During the early 1920s it was estimated that the Klan had up to 6 million members, today it is believed they have around 8,000 (though it has more sympathizers). Scientology has more members than the Klan today.

So what is the big picture? Well to begin with Neo-Nazi's and Klansmen did not send our jobs overseas or crash the economy. Neither did Muslim terrorists or gays or blacks or Jews or people who believe that abortion is a right. The biggest problem in this country is the lack of opportunity for the middle class and working class. Racism is real and still continues; but, to view it as the cause of all our problems is merely an attempt to distract from the actual problems themselves. The truth is there are many more homeless people than there are members of the Klan.

Now, here is the real issue and battle. It is spiritual. The bible says that Satan accuses us day and night before God. What do you think he accuses us of? Jesus said that the most important commandment was to love God with all our heart and our neighbor as ourselves. Satan accuses us of not doing that. 

Prohibiting people from saying what they believe is slavery. Stopping free speech is to promote slavery. It used to be illegal to teach slaves to read and write. The English made it illegal to speak Gaelic (Irish language) in Ireland when the British ruled us all. Prohibiting women from controlling their bodies, even when pregnant, is slavery. Prohibiting Nazi's from speaking is slavery. Slavery is wrong, no matter what the excuse. You cannot imprison beliefs.

Mans most basic sin is trying to enslave others and thinking they are better than others. You can be stronger, smarter and more educated and it still does not make you better. If you cut me, do I not bleed? Sorry Shakespeare, I steal good thoughts. We do not have to act on every thought we have and can control our actions. Thoughts are merely emotions put to words and cannot be controlled.


By the way, MSN - Tribune News Service - Rights leaders ask Trump to fire 'alt-right' hero Bannon. The interesting statement in the article is, "Religious and civil rights leaders called on President Donald Trump to fire White House advisers Steve Bannon and Sebastian Gorka, whose association with the white-supremacist "alt-right" movement has come under heightened scrutiny after Saturday's violent clash in Charlottesville, Va."  The article says that "alt right" and "white supremacist" are the same thing.  Does this mean that if you don't believe that color matters then you are not alt right? If you believe in border control; but, don't care about which race is the best than you are not alt right according to the writer of the article. If you believe in border control do you have to be a homophobe? Not according to the articles writer. He missed the talking points. I used to preach to Hispanic gays that did not feel comfortable around transgenders and they were far from alt right. Most were here as refugees from places where they would be killed for being gay. Bigotry is when you think you know everything about someone because of one belief they have or one characteristic they share.

Sunday, August 6, 2017

A Little History About the Law of the Land

If you want to understand the constitution, you have to understand what preceded it. July 4, 1776 is NOT the beginning of the United States. It is when the Declaration of Independence was finalized. The first constitution (actual laws) did not come about until March 1, 1778 when the Articles of Confederation were adopted and in force.

The Articles of Confederation.

The AofC did not really create a nation as we think of one. What they really did was created something more akin to the European Union; but, weaker. One of the things in the AofC was a statement about militias. "No vessel of war shall be kept up in time of peace by any State, except such number only, as shall be deemed necessary by the united States in congress assembled, for the defense of such State, or its trade; nor shall any body of forces be kept up by any State in time of peace, except such number only, as in the judgement of the united States, in congress assembled, shall be deemed requisite to garrison the forts necessary for the defense of such State; but every State shall always keep up a well-regulated and disciplined militia, sufficiently armed and accoutered, and shall provide and constantly have ready for use, in public stores, a due number of field pieces and tents, and a proper quantity of arms, ammunition and camp equipage."

See the part where the AofC used the same term as used in the later Constitution, "well-regulated and disciplined militia"? The exact same reason the current Constitution protected gun ownership. Gun ownership was never considered a personal right by the founders. Sorry guys; but, it just wasn't and more importantly even states were prohibited to have warships without the express permission of the United States. Another interesting point is that Article XI (11) allowed Canada to join the United States if it so chose. And who had the right to vote? That was left up to the individual states and guess what, in the South blacks didn't even count as one vote; but, when they created the constitution, slaves counted as 3/5ths of a vote even though they still could not vote. That meant that the white landowners in the south's votes were each worth 1 and 3/5ths that of people living in the north.

In many ways the Articles of Confederation were a wealthy man's privilege in legal form. It was 13 oligarchies controlling their own individual states, true states rights. The current Constitution was fully ratified in May of 1790 (though 11 states had already ratified and were technically the United States). The US Constitution was meant to limit state rights and strengthen the federal government because the Articles of Confederation had failed so badly.

Lets get back to gun rights for a moment. When preparing the "Bill of Rights", James Madison originally wanted it to say, "The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed; a well armed, and well regulated militia being the best security of a free country: but no person religiously scrupulous of bearing arms, shall be compelled to render military service in person." Notice how the same sentence is about keeping and bearing arms and the ability to refuse military service in person. That in person part meant that you could pay someone else to do your fighting for you and that happened a lot. The Bill of Rights went into effect on December 15, 1791. You know how we know that the Constitution did not give you an individual right to bear arms? Simple, it was ILLEGAL for slaves to own guns in many states. They were counted as 3/5ths of a person according to the Constitution, yet, they could not own guns. I should also point out that Japanese Americans who were put in determent camps during World War II. Heck, in the 1800s the police often required you to turn in your guns before coming into town and that was cowboys. Even today we prohibit felons from owning guns and from voting. Don't tell me you a constitutional strict constructionist if you think felons lose the ten amendments, that my friends is not in the constitution.

A true strict constructionist attempts to determine what the people who approved the Constitution and amendments meant when they wrote it and lets be clear, they didn't believe the same things we do. The Constitution was meant to keep state oligarchies in power while giving greater central control over the nation to the central government. If you want to be really strict in your construction of the Constitution, the abolition of slavery is sort of a dodgy question as there was no Constitutional Amendment abolishing it, that was done by executive decree, specifically, The Emancipation Proclamation and really only applied to Confederate states.

Bees, Sperm Counts and Questions

International Business Times - Sperm Count Declines Worlwide, Western Men See Record Low Fertility. Lets start with the basic facts and point out where the title of the article is intentionally misleading. Sperm counts have NOT declined worldwide, just in the western nations. There has been a 59% decrease in sperm counts in men in Europe, the North America, Australia and New Zealand since 1973. They have found NO decline in South America, Africa or Asia.

Oxford Academic - Temporal trends in sperm count: a systematic review and meta-regression analysis.  Here is a link to the actual published study.

While this has been studied since the early 1970s, scientists still have no idea as to what is causing it, or so we are told. In fact, they have stated that smoking, obesity and even global warming may be causing it; but, those are lies. Lets start with smoking, it has been steadily decreasing in the west since the late 1960s, not increasing. However in the places where sperm counts are not going down, smoking has either remained relatively the same or increased, such as in Asia. Obesity also does not explain it. As for global warming, that is just laughable as global means global and the impact would be worldwide, not just in western countries.

So why doesn't the media care more about this issue? Why aren't western governments freaking out and spending the same amount of attention to this issue that they do to global warming. I mean, after all, at this rate the sperm count in western males will be zero in another 40 years. It's just math. Could this be due to hormones in our foods? Could it be due to chemicals in our environment (actually the west regulates chemicals in our environment much more than does China, India, Africa or South America where sperm counts are not declining)? I guess the only people that don't need to be worried about global warming are people living in the western world because we won't live to see it.

CBS News - 40 percent of U.S. bee colonies died in past year. In 2015 this report came out. Again, very large numbers and no overwhelming concern from the media. It is mentioned; but, not very often, certainly not as often as whether or not Trump likes one or two scoops of Ice Cream or whether or not transgenders should be in the military (all 250 of them). So what is killing the bees? The most likely candidate is pesticides.

It is bad enough that western societies have dropped their birth rate by refusing to have children, in the future they won't be able to. Oh, and just in case you think this is a "white male" thing, it is not, it is all westerners, blacks, whites and Arab, Asian, African immigrants who move to the western world. The drop is not genetic, it is environmental.

Saturday, August 5, 2017

Speech Crime

USA Today - Suicide texting case sets bad precedent, experts say.

CNN - The text messages that led up to teen's suicide.

A 17 year old girl got regular text messages from her boyfriend where he said he was going to kill himself. At first she tried to get him to go to therapy and much later told him to just do it. He did. He killed himself. She was charged with murder and ended up getting two and a half years for involuntary manslaughter.

Murder by speech. Murder by text message? It was not murder, it was not manslaughter. It was suicide. My wife left me for another man and took everything I had. I did not commit suicide, though I was quite ready to die. Even Jim Jones actually put a gun to people's heads to make them drink the Koolaid. Please tell me, was she responsible for not stopping him. She didn't bring up the idea, he did. I guess she wasn't a very good psychologist at 17. Maybe she was a really dumb child; but, she was still a child. She is now paying for his sin, not hers.

Tell me you have never wished someone dead. Tell me you have never told another to just die or wished that they would. We are going to charge you for the air you breath, a carbon tax. And, we are going to hold you guilty for bad thoughts and bad words, hate speech. Do you think that slaves wished their masters dead? The most oppressive slavery starts by outlawing words and then thoughts.

Thursday, August 3, 2017

What Is Free Speech?

Does freedom of speech mean the freedom to be heard? Does it mean the freedom to explore ideas that are wrong in the opinion of the majority or specific groups? Does it include the right to call other people "nigger" or "faggot" or "Nazi" or "bitch" or "fuckhead"? Does it include the right to discuss the history of those words or what they used to mean? Does it include the right to discuss similarities amongst the people who use those terms? Can I at least discuss whether or not whites can say "nigger" or just blacks? My regular readers know that I do not use such terms in this blog; but, can I if it helps us to ask other questions? Am I free to bring up these issues? How can I talk honestly about the KKK if I don't use these words to explain what they believe?

What is freedom of speech and why does it matter? Can we outlaw the letter N or F? What if racists and homophobes started just using the letter instead of saying the word, could we outlaw that and would we want to outlaw a letter? You cannot outlaw a concept or a belief set. You cannot make it illegal to hate blacks or gays. You cannot legislate the ten commandments. How do you make it illegal for people to love Satan or a rock more than God? You cannot even legislate the first commandment because you cannot outlaw beliefs or love.

YouTube is attempting to regulate what people can discuss and they want to use computer programs to do it. Billionaires intend to regulate what you can say over the internet by telling computers what you can and cannot say. After the programs are written they will tell you it is fair because the computer is choosing what is good and bad. Computers cannot make moral decisions. They have no soul and do not have to live with the consequences because they have no life, they are just formulas being run by calculators, nothing more.

More books were sold last year as computer files than as physical books. More e-mails are sent in a day than are physical letters in a year, I will bet you. They don't even teach handwriting in school anymore. Try getting hold of a printing press and the ink and the paper. The infrastructure that would allow publishing written materials is going bye bye and what will be left will be very expensive.

Now lets talk about the internet. Do Muslims in Saudi Arabia have the right to use the internet to say they hate Jews on Arab websites? Do blacks in Africa have the right to discuss how the Europeans should all die for having stolen their people and their lands? Do American Indians have the right to use the internet to discuss how the white man came and took their lands and should all die? Do I have the right to say that a quarter of the English should starve to death as they starved my family, the Irish to death? Will I be free to read the New York Times editorial that said that the famine in Ireland might solve the "Irish Problem"? Should I be able to read Nazi propaganda from the 30s and 40s online so that I can understand how they did what they did?

If it is legal to have the Playboy channel on cable then should it be illegal to post the pictures online? I personally would not like it to be illegal for Penn Jillette of Penn and Teller to be prohibited from saying people that believe in God are idiots. FYI, he doesn't tend to do that, he is usually a respectful atheist as he is also a Libertarian and one of the best magician ever. Heck, I would be more than comfortable and happy to actually have an in depth religious discussion with him. As much as I know he believes in free speech who hid probably not agree with the next part of this post.

If the only way to communicate with the world is the internet than restrictions on what you can and cannot say are immoral if they prohibit the free exchange of ideas, even ones I find repulsive or threatening. You cannot legislate consent. It is wrong for Facebook, YouTube and Google to regulate belief when they are the center of social discussion.

If China regulates what you can say on the internet we call it repression and an immoral prohibition of free speech. If Facebook does it then people on the right will say it is capitalism and fine because Facebook is not the government. How does that work in a nation where all social media is controlled by corporations?

If you say that I can start my own Facebook you would be lying to yourself as the European Union now claims the right to fine you for what goes on the internet. What if we placed the exact same rules on the internet that we place on the U.S. mail? It is illegal to send child pornography using the mail system. It is however legal to send a letter to another saying that your brother in law is a no good nigger faggot xenophobe. Should your free speech end when you use a computer to speak it?

Just so you know, the current YouTube algorithm and Facebook rules could prohibit you from ever seeing this post because they would not judge the content properly. If blogger were to apply the same rules, this single blog could mark me as not being searchable.

Wednesday, August 2, 2017

I Know, I am not Writing Much

MSN - USA Today - Robots stealing all human jobs isn't the problem we should worry about. This is. Let my shock fill me, the greatest minds in technology see a future coming very soon where they don't need workers. And yet, they see the problem as being one of people finding purpose when their labor is no longer needed. Kids, I have been telling you this for almost a decade and I have previously pointed out that the Unabomber, Ted Kaczynski, had written his manifesto about this exact issue and has been quoted by numerous tech geniuses.  His manifesto is titled, "INDUSTRIAL SOCIETY AND ITS FUTURE", which you can read by clicking the link. The link is to the Washington Post.

US News - AP - Where Does Democracy Stand This July Fourth?  Fascism begins when they convince the people that democracy does not work and the wealthy and powerful never have ever believed in democracy, they believe in oligarchies. That is history.

Vanity Fair - Read the Letter Aaron Sorkin Wrote His Daughter After Donald Trump Was Elected President.  I want you to read this, read the article in the link. It is important. Multi millionaires are afraid of Trump and of regular old working class and middle class people because they see us as the mindless great unwashed. Read the letter in the link. Read the mans own words, "And it wasn’t just Donald Trump who won last night—it was his supporters too. The Klan won last night. White nationalists. Sexists, racists and buffoons. Angry young white men who think rap music and Cinco de Mayo are a threat to their way of life (or are the reason for their way of life) have been given cause to celebrate. Men who have no right to call themselves that and who think that women who aspire to more than looking hot are shrill, ugly, and otherwise worthy of our scorn rather than our admiration struck a blow for misogynistic shitheads everywhere." Unlike me, elitists believe they matter more than the rest of us. I am Aspergers and many who are look down on normal people. I don't. The strong look down on the weak, the smart look down on those less smart and all are wrong. Read the motto of this blog, "You Matter". I did not say you only matter if you are a genius or strong.

I met the most wonderful woman in the world on my first day of sixth grade. She was really smart and had just skipped a grade. Imagine going from 4th grade straight to 6th grade and still getting all As. She met me and could see that I didn't just have no respect for the other students, I didn't respect the teachers and knew I knew more than them and proved it daily. My teacher begged my parents to have me skip grades; but, my mother knew it would mean I would never respect others and wouldn't let it happen. I thank God for my mother keeping me back and letting me learn that even normals matter. Oligarchs and elitists don't believe what I believe, I believe everybody matters and we can all learn more. I just believe in sharing the information we learn, they don't. The girl I met in 6th grade saw my arrogance and disrespect for those less intelligent and poked me in the eye to let me know that she saw them for what they were and didn't want me to hurt them. She taught me that "you matter", not me, that everyone matters and I have loved her heart for that ever since that day, even now although she has passed on. The people who believe they are your betters have no respect for you and do not believe you matter anymore than their dogs and cats. They don't see you as important as they see themselves. Julia saved me from that.

BBC News - Sperm count drop 'could make humans extinct'. What the hell do I care about global warming if people will stop being able to have children?

The Guardian - Britain to ban sale of all diesel and petrol cars and vans from 2040. You know, whenever I tell people that you won't own your car and they will all be self driving and electric, like I have written about for a decade, they say, "Not in my lifetime". Should I assume they believe they will be dead within 23 years?

Do you want to know how they view you? Let their words speak for themselves.

Here is an e-mail from Bill Ivey of Global Cultural Strategies to John Podesta. WikiLeaks - The e-mail between Ivey and him, from Ivey. Here is the important line of the communication, " And as I've mentioned, we've all been quite content to demean government, drop civics and in general conspire to produce an unaware and compliant citizenry. The unawareness remains strong but compliance is obviously fading rapidly. This problem demands some serious, serious thinking - and not just poll driven, demographically-inspired messaging."

The one thing the powerful really fear is a second French revolution where they just get wiped out for their crimes against the world. The thing they fear is you paying attention to what they are doing to keep control over you.

There is a biblical reason for all of this, bad shepherds who are hired hands and nothing more and sheep and even sheep dogs. The Pimpernel knows how the game ends, the powerful do not. Enjoy what you have, take care of one another and don't sweat it. Life, like motion, is just the passage of time. YOU MATTER.

Wednesday, July 26, 2017

Transgenders in the Military

Body dysmorphic disorder is basically a mental disorder whereby the person rejects their body as it is. The person with the disorder may starve themselves to death (anorexia) or seek out unnecessary body modification (the person who wants to be turned into a cat or other extreme forms of plastic surgery) or even the removal of healthy body parts (transgenderism).

Lets just deal with some basic facts. If you don't like the political implications then at least don't be a science denier. Do not associate transgender with homosexuality, they are different things. I have known many gays and only one was transgender. It is estimated that the suicide rate for transgender people is 41%. The problem they face is that no matter where you go, there you are. You do not change because you change your body, you keep the same mind and pain.

I have previously written that I don't care about who uses the bathroom and I still don't. I do have a problem with body mutilation. Funny thing is there are people who don't believe in circumcision but are completely fine with complete sex change operations. If someone came into a doctors office and said they were a one armed man in a two armed body and wanted one of their arms remove, what would your response be? Wouldn't you treat it as a psychological problem?

President Trump tweeted out that he wouldn't allow transgender people in the military and we shouldn't. The military should not be where you go to get free transgender operations. You also should not be able to get the prison system to pay for it. Neither gives free face lifts.

For me the issue is even simpler. Has there suddenly been a rash of people who have had sex change operations signing up for military service that I haven't heard about? This is a made up problem, it is a distraction from real issues. You want to know a real issue? Universal healthcare is a real issue and universal healthcare should not include sex change operations or face lifts, those are highly elective and should be paid for by the person. While I support a woman's right to control their own body and favor free condoms and birth control, abortions are an elective surgery too and should also be paid for by the person choosing it. The right to choose does not include the right to not pay for your choices. In fact, I believe their should be a tax on most plastic surgery to pay for universal healthcare. I don't know the current number but 60% of all surgeries used to be elective plastic surgeries, like liposuction and face lifts. Both of which take doctors away from doing necessary surgeries.

Male and female are not descriptions of gender identification, they are medically defines by your chromosomes, not by your opinion. XX or XY genes. Putting silicon breast implants in someone and removing their penis does not make them a woman or change their genetic makeup (though that may come someday). Find me a biologist that would disagree.

Another place where we find science deniers is on the issue of abortion. In everything except abortion we accept genetics as determining your species. Genetically unborn babies are still human. Life, according to science, is when a being exhibits certain traits, such as gas exchange, cell duplication and other actual conditions that can be married. To say that an unborn baby is not a living human is scientifically a lie. To say that we have a right to control what a woman's body is slavery and I am against outlawing abortion because I don't believe in slavery; but, that doesn't change the science.

The fact is that these issues only truly effect the person involved. So why is the discussion of transgender people in the military getting so much discussion right now. Simple, to distract from the GOPs failure to get Obamacare repealed or do anything about taxes. It's funny how Republican politicians who are against gay marriage are suddenly outraged that Trump said transgender people should not be in the military. The same people who are against universal healthcare supporting transgender rights in the military. That alone should raise a red flag and rather than getting upset, you should understand how you are being manipulated.

As an aside, the way you know you are hearing a nonsense argument is the set up. Why do people always seek to talk about gays when talking about child molesters and transgender  people, it is not the same thing. Two men having sex is not the same as a grown adult man having sex with a ten year old boy. A man having his penis removed is not the same as a man who has sex with other men. I personally find comparing having women and blacks in the military to having people who want to remove healthy parts of their body vastly different and an insult to the women and minorities in the military. I should also point out that I have zero problem with gays in the military.

Tuesday, July 25, 2017

I am Angry

In this life you cannot buy true love or true loyalty. You cannot buy the truth, character or honor. All of these things are given freely or not at all.

A few years ago I had a relative working for a wealthy person who lived near the Reagan Presidential Museum. My relative lived on the property. There was a fire near the museum and it was out of control. I think it was called the Simi Valley fire but I really don't remember for sure. My relative called me to say that we couldn't meet because he was watering down the roof of the house of the person he worked for so that it wouldn't catch fire. I drove out to the place and helped. The fire got within feet and I personally saved this man's horses and got someone to evacuate them.

When the fire had been put out and the problem was over, the person my relative worked for didn't even bother to say thank you to me for helping. I didn't say anything about it, I just went home. I have helped many people in my life and I have leant many more money. I have discovered that most never pay you back either and that you should never expect either help or repayment in any form. In fact, I have made people's careers and had them stab me in the back, including people I personally promoted.

The sense of betrayal can bitter and I know, my wife left me for another man, the hardest betrayal of all. Yet, somehow I forgave her in my heart and him. I still think about it sometimes; but, yea, I forgave them, they have to live with what they do and did, not me. The time to really practice forgiveness is when you are angry, that way it gets easier to forgive.


I'm really mad. When I was asked to preach around five years ago, I wrote a post which asked what I would tell my kids. How do I tell my kids that I am going to be preaching? That was the post. Where the hell does someone find the ego to claim that they can explain the bible or who God is? For me, I was asked to. In fact, I was tricked into preaching. I thought it was a one off. Sort of like a guest lecturer. I didn't think it would cost me thousands and pay me nothing or last for years.

To me, agreeing to preach is a sacred honor, not a duty. I did not berate people for being bad, I challenged them to be better. I preached to gays. I didn't tell them to hate their gayness, I told them to be good gays. To honor their commitments, even relationship ones. People forget this bit from the bible; but, it is a good one as are they all. The question was raised whether believers in Christ should stay with spouses who were not believers. The answer was that as you came to Christ, so you should honor your past marital commitments. God does not tell us not to love another and once committed to them we should fulfill that promise. Gays don't understand that (and neither do Christian ones), they think those moral rules do not apply to them because they are gay. I told them that is wrong and unfortunately the statistics for gay divorces is even higher than that for straights.

I wrote about how hard it was to tell people I was going to preach when I am imperfect. Atheists view Christians as children who believe in fairy tales. I had a real job, I had a real high profile difficult job. I have a doctorate and national honors. I was recognized as an expert in multiple fields. People in other countries know who I am. My opinion was sought and still is. When I started taking in the homeless these people freaked. I took them in before I began preaching.

Most people do not believe God is real. Most people will say they believe in a God; but, the reality is that they don't believe in a real God. A sentience that can hear your every thought. He can. That is one of the more intimidating things about him. I have the feeling this blog might get a lot more interesting in the future. If anyone starts thinking about "A Christmas Carol" down the road they might make a comment when they do.

Going to church for most is just a ritual, it is just a thing you do. Most Catholics do not believe that the Pope speaks the innate word of God.

I have told the story of Abraham more than once. God asked Abraham to kill his first born and he was going to until God told him not to at the last minute. God told the Jews to kill all the Arabs in Israel and they didn't do it. They knew it was wrong; but, had used the opportunity to get some land. Free will means God lets you choose. Sometimes God tells  us to do the wrong thing. We choose when to argue the point or fail to define ourselves. There is a difference and difference is what we choose. What we choose defines us, not God. Think you cannot argue with God. Abraham argued with God over destroying Sodom and Gomorrah. Why didn't he argue with God over killing his first born?

When we choose to sell our time, we choose more than does a slave; but, not totally as we are still under duress. When I choose to work or whom I choose to work for,defines me; but, the need for money creates duress, pressure. Everybody works for somebody, how much does it matter to you who you work for or does it only matter what you are paid? If both matter than where is your line.

The moment you take to the pulpit, you know people are laughing at you. Try doing that when you control hundreds of millions a year. Try telling your kids who saw your wife leave you for another man, go preach and preach forgiveness. You better believe it when you say it. I don't mind it when Atheists laugh at me, it just gets in the way of knowing one another. I do mind it when Christians think people being willing to risk their reputation in order to preach are stupid.

We are imperfect in every way and perfect in none. Should a atheist murderer stop being an atheist or a murderer first? Wait, Jesus said what the most important commandment was, love God with all your heart ... and your neighbor as yourself or something very much like that. Once you meet the most important commandment, loving all completely, you begin working on the others one. You just wont have to because you meet the love one and all the others become second nature.

Monday, July 24, 2017

Why Europe Wanted Unfettered Migration.

Have you ever met wealthy people who feel they are superior to you? I have. I have seen the face of those who feel the world owes them. I knew a billionaire; but, he was not that way and neither was his family. Most self made people believe in meritocracy. The wealthy in England used to look down on new money, self made people. Self made people do not run this world.

We tax just about every form of income except one, inheritance. When we attempt to tax that it is referred to as a death tax. You cannot tax the dead, they are dead and own nothing. Why don't we tax inherited income as we tax earned income? We tax lottery winnings as income. Why? If I inherit money isn't it still income to me?

"Old money", people whose family have a history of running the world, feel entitled and look down on the rest of us. They send their children to special schools to learn how to manage the world and the rest of us. They don't learn the same things in school, not even the dumb ones.

I want you to see what young rich children learn, lets look at one of the schools they attend. Phillip's Academy, Andover.

Course of Study.

They can learn Latin, Chinese, Arabic, Russian or a bunch of others. They take classes in all of the arts. Read the course of study by clicking the link above. That is what their high schools are like. Do I have to explain what public high schools teach? The playing field has never been level and probably never will be. We make the situation even worse by not giving all children a free education equal to the education that those they compete with will have.

I had a friend in college, he was born to wealth. He lived in a penthouse in Boston and would piss away $25,000 on a weekend in Vegas in the 1980s. Very few people make it into grad school and most of them come from money because they can afford it and could afford to have gone to one of the better schools. I used to beat those people to a pulp academically; but, I have a over 155 IQ. All the education in the world cannot beat an idiot savant like me. Why shouldn't everyone get the same level of education? Because they don't want a fair race or meritocracy, they believe this is their world and we are parasites on it.

The non-populists elitists don't want a fair fight. They avoid a fair fight by keeping the vast majority ignorant and uneducated, only smart enough to read comics. Read that course of study, read the class outlines, read the whole darn thing to understand who your children are competing with. Imagine what the world would be like if all children were taught that well.

Imagine how kids that grew up with the superior education look at their contemporaries. I know how they look at us. In my first year of law school they didn't bother with me. After I got my first American Jurisprudence Award, they all wanted to be my friend and study partner. What none of them knew as that unlike everyone else, I was asked to apply to the school. I didn't seek them out, they sought me out. I didn't know the school until they invited me to attend. Did you know that we were not allowed to work the first year of law school? That was to keep out the poor. I lived on $25 a week and that included my cigarettes. This is not a meritocracy.

There is a term, it is offensive. House Nigger. A house nigger was a slave that didn't have to toil in the field, they ate better than the other slaves, they dressed better than the other slaves and were treated better. You had to treat them better because they could kill you with a knife as you slept because they were often your personal valet. Yet, they were still called niggers. I hope you find that offensive because I do and that is how old money looks at everyone else regardless of sex, race, color or sexual orientation or religion. We argue over which is worse, white, black, gay. straight, Muslim, Jew, whatever. They just question who is annoying them the most at the moment. I said it before, there are three guys on crosses, a Jew, a black and a white guy and they start arguing over who has it worse.

If you understood what I just wrote than maybe you can understand this. A document from the United Nations written in about 2000 has just come to light. It shows what I have written about for years, that the population curve n Europe is below sustainable levels. A nation or culture needs to have 2.11 children for every couple and we ain't making that in the west or Japan. We are not looking at overpopulation, we are looking at under population. We are looking at not having a replacement society in Europe.

If you wish to know why Europe is taking in so many "refugees", it is simple, they need people to replace their native populations that have chosen not to have children. If your slaves don't have children you buy new slaves. You move sheep by herding them. We don't even teach civics in school anymore. We don't teach the average person's kids how to manage societies.

Replacement Migration: Is It a Solution to Declining and Ageing Populations?

Yep, the United Nations was talking about the need for large numbers of people to migrate to Europe to replace their existing people in 2000. Were you told about that? Did you know that conversation was going on? What makes you think you live in a democracy, you live in an oligarchy.

Friday, July 21, 2017

Just some quick news

MSN - CNBC - This is your captain faces pilot shortage. This article is a lie. We could easily train enough people to be pilots which is a good paying job.

CBS - Boeing To Test Self-Flying Planes.  It is cheaper to build self flying planes.

VICE - The Mayor Who Loved China. This is the same mayor who wants to build a 10 story tall Buddha in the middle of the Mojave desert.

Wednesday, July 19, 2017

I Will Write Again

Sorry guys but I haven't seen anything worth writing about. I have however watched some really interesting YouTube videos and thought I might post one of them.

Tuesday, July 11, 2017

Hypocrites and Donald Trump Jr.

So the new line of garbage is that Donald Trump Jr. met with a Russian and that the Russian offered to give information about how Hillary was getting money from Russians or some such garbage. Well, Hillary did get money from Russian bankers, they paid Bill a half million dollars to give in speech in Russia after she approved the deal where 20% of U.S, Uranium is now owned by Russia. The Huffington Post posted this.

Huffington Post - Exactly Why Donald Trump Jr.’s Meeting With A Russian Lawyer Could Be Illegal.

The article claims that it is illegal for anyone to get anything from a foreigner that might be useful to a candidate. It claims that a Russian offered Donald Trump Jr information about Hillary and that could be a crime. Lets break this down. Firstly, they misstate the law, information is not a brief. The law is about money or promises of money or something else of similar nature. Secondly, you can refuse to take money but not hear someone. Thirdly, there is no claim that Donald Jr used anything was told, in fact, the campaign for his father never claimed Hillary was doing what the Russian who spoke to Donald Jr claimed she was. Finally, and the real point of this post, the DNC hired an English ex spy to write a dossier to hurt Trump, you know the one that claimed Trump had prostitutes piss on a bed that the Obamas had slept in. That is the hypocritical part.

Wednesday, July 5, 2017

CNN and Abuse of Power

"CNN is not publishing “HanA**holeSolo’s” name because he is a private citizen who has issued an extensive statement of apology, showed his remorse by saying he has taken down all his offending posts, and because he said he is not going to repeat this ugly behavior on social media again. In addition, he said his statement could serve as an example to others not to do the same."
"CNN reserves the right to publish his identity should any of that change."

Someone of Reddit modified a video of Trump at a wrestling match smacking the owner of the wrestling channel and put "CNN" over Vince McMahan's face. Trump retweeted it and hilarity ensued as the corporate media flipped out and claimed it could endanger reporters lives. CNN tracked down the person who made the video and he apologized. CNN said he sounded nervous. CNN then discussed exposing his identity to the world and the quote from above is what CNN wrote and posted.

CNN and the others in corporate media do not understand social media, they are only compounding their arrogance and lies for all to see. It is funny that the corporate media decries attacks on free speech while at the same time threatening and attacking people for exercising free speech on social media. If what CNN did was meant to threaten others, it backfired and the anti-CNN memes are now flowing at lightening speed. They may not like it; but, the corporate media no longer controls the narrative.

Sunday, July 2, 2017

Trump, CNN and a Wrestling Video

Someone on Reddit made the video above and President Trump posted a copy of it on Twitter. The corporate media's response was to say that Trump is calling for violence on reporters. Wait, this is the same media that called for Trump's impeachment prior to the election actually being held. This is the same media that defended Kathy Griffin showing Trump's decapitated head as a bad joke. This is the same media that said the voters were stupid and the same media that supported a play about Ceaser which ends with Trump being stabbed to death. Nobody cares what the media thinks anymore.

This is how the media reacted to Trump's winning the presidency. Why would we expect them to ever be honest or reasonable about Trump.

Here is the bottom line issue. If you continually attack someone, expect them to respond. Pretty simple. Between May and June the mainstream corporate media spent 353 minutes attacking Trump for a false Russia collusion claim that they have zero evidence of. This same media spent only 1 minute discussing tax reform, 3 minutes discussing infrastructure, 5 minutes discussing the economy and jobs and 17 minutes discussing healthcare. We have all seen Trump be attacked for just stupid stuff like how many scoops of ice cream he has at dinner or that he likes his steaks well done and the media is offended that he fights back and expects you to be upset by it too. Look at the comments online, real people are not upset, real people think it is hilarious.

Not Writing, Just Thinking

Sorry kids, the Pimpernel hasn't felt something worthy of writing about for a few days. I will say this much, I am still thinking about making YouTube videos. I feel more people might hear what I have to say and feel I don't get enough comments here. I spoke to my brother about that tonight. He said that he didn't think my blog seemed to invite comments. He seems to believe that my posts don't really ask questions; but, rather answer them. I don't know what I think about that.

I guess it is like when I was preaching. If someone had asked me why they should believe in God, I would have told them that I don't care what you believe in. It is not my job to tell you what to believe in, it is my job to tell you what I believe in. I want you to think about that for a second.

I write to tell others what I see. I am totally fine with people not seeing the same thing and ignoring me or even questioning me. It is not my job to convince anyone of anything, the bible says that we should have an answer for the hope that lies within us. I have answer for why I believe what I believe.

I don't make money from this and have decided if I would monetize a YouTube video, if I choose to make them; but, I am not monetizing this blog and never have. I have written thousands of posts for almost a decade and have never made a penny. I deeply feel for the Daniels family; but, I have made it very clear I never thought they would ever read my stuff and did not write about the case for any personal reason, I just thought there was too many garbage answers being given. I absolutely wish someone with more attention and viewership would talk about the case. I actually reached out to a YouTuber, who has many more views than I, about the case, someone that talks about such things and asked them to do a video about the case. They have not and did not respond to me, I will not mention who it was.

I want to know my readers opinions. Should I start doing YouTube videos? I would have more viewers; but, would video of me talking about these things detract from the written word? Would the people that read my writing like to hear my voice, I won't show my face, I'm just not that pretty. I have been told that I write the way I sound in person. I can't judge that. You decide. NO, you give your opinion, I decide what I do. Peace and thanks for caring enough to keep reading my nonsense.

Tuesday, June 20, 2017

The Illusion of White Privilege

Let's start with a joke. A Jew, a black man and an Irishman are all being put to death on crosses and they begin arguing over who is being better treated and why. Now that is the definition of stupid.

I have previously stated that I am Irish, well, American of Irish descent. I have also stated that the English starved one fourth of us to death with the Irish famine. That included people in my family. How many people starved their slaves to death? Not to many, they saw it as the same as starving their horses to death. Slave owners saw their slaves as their property. The Irish had no value to the English at all. I want you to take a moment and think about that, it is not the point I am going to make but is in and of itself something to consider. You see it is about human value.

When I was young I resented the English as I learned of what they had done and were still doing to my nationality. I was about 11 when Bloody Sunday happened. You can look it up or just listen to U2. I heard how the news spun it all and watched as Britain justified it. I saw the propaganda machine at work. I felt a quiet anger as my anger usually is. Anger makes me contemplative and strategic, it is my warning bell to look deeper and find my opponents weakness. I began asking myself what would be acceptable responses to the English by the Irish Republican Army and violence seemed to make sense. It is the simplest of questions, is it okay for the oppressed to kill their oppressor. A simple question that misses the moral issue while making you think it nails it; but that is not the point of this post either.

Lets look at the life of the average Englishman. Is he doing that well? How has he been treated historically. Ever see Braveheart?  The English monarchy treated nations as slaves to the king including their own. The owners of this world do not see color and they don't see sex and they don't see age, they see slaves and competitors for owning the slaves. Should I complain about English privilege?

Define privilege. It means to get a step up on others. It means that someone starts the game with a bigger advantage. Now who should the person given no advantage blame? The person who was started one step ahead, two steps ahead or a thousand steps ahead? Divide and conquer means starting one group in front of another while you are a thousand steps ahead. You get them to righteously fight amongst each other. I have described how musical chairs is the same thing. While 99% of you fight over the increasingly diminishing number of chairs, I take them all but one so you fight each other over the one last chair while I have the rest.

I could have used male privilege as my example or any other privilege you believe exists in a bigoted (the word means universal and generalized, attributing a common thing to a group) way. What is the greatest privilege in the world? What can you be born into that will give you more advantage from the start till the end of life? I think I know the answer and I think the answer is wealth. Beauty and strength can be taken in a moment as can fame; but, money can empower the ugliest, meanest, weakest and most corrupt person in the world for life and beyond. Money is the one thing the world makes sure can be passed on to your children.


I received a comment to this post which you can read in the comment section. The response included a link to a video which I have watched. I am not impressed by the video as it fails to meet certain basic requirements. Lets start with looking at the actual law and not just someone's comments on it.

Legislative Assembly of Ontario - Bill 89, Supporting Children, Youth and Families Act, 2017.

The video claims that Canada passed the law to support gender fluidity and multiculturalism. That is not true. In fact, Canada has had a problem for a long time. Canada used to remove native children from their homes and send them to boarding schools to teach them to be more like Canadians.

If you read the actual bill and know Canadian history you come to understand that they are trying to undue a history of oppression of native Canadian Indians. Here is a quote from the actual law, "One of the additional purposes in the current Act is to recognize that services to Indian and native children and families should be provided in a manner that recognizes their culture, heritage and traditions, and the concept of the extended family." The truth is that the law is aimed at foster care and adoption primarily. The people that made the video in the comment below (click on the word comments at the bottom of this post to read it and see the video) are right wing extremists, I looked at their other videos. The rumour is wrong, it is not illegal to call your children son or daughter in Canada. 

As for the case mentioned in the comment video, here is the actual document submitted by the family to the court.


Two girls were put in foster care while waiting to be reunited with their biological family. Mr. Baars was working on becoming a minister and did not believe in holidays. Imagine having a Foster family that will not allow you to celebrate your birthday because they are Jehovah's witnesses. Here is an actual quote of what the Baars claimed, "Ms. Lindsay’s comments did not relate to any actual situations we were facing as foster parents.  We had not interacted with any prospective adoptive couples, nor would we be doing so, because the plan with our foster girls was that they would be reunited with their biological family. We repeatedly protested this offensive allegation.  We assured Ms. Lindsay that we would treat any same-sex adoptive parents as people worthy of dignity and respect.  Yet, Ms. Lindsay, without any factual basis or grounding, persisted in telling us that because of our religious faith, we would discriminate against same-sex couples.  Ms. Lindsay told us that she intended to prevent us from ever encountering a same sex couple, and that she intended to close our foster home."

The couple were responsible for meeting with prospective adoptive parents and refused to do so according to their own words. The case had nothing to do with sexual orientation, it had to do with the responsibility of foster parents and they refused to do their job. This case also predates the new law.

Sunday, June 18, 2017

Happy Father's Day

To all my readers, friends and family that are father's or care for children I wish you a happy father's day.

Saturday, June 17, 2017

Three Articles For You To Read

The Guardian - Faking 'wokeness': how advertising targets millennial liberals for profit.

Breitbart - Jerry Brown Plays President; Signs Climate Deal with China.  When a Governor or Mayor signs a international agreement, who gets to vote on it?

Wired - Humans Can’t Expect AI to Just Fight Fake News for Them.  People are seriously using artificial intelligence to determine what you can and cannot say in public. Hmmm, just like the question of whether or not NBC has the right to post an interview with someone the coasts hate, Alex Jones, except it lets anyone decide who is offensive to the civic body. Whoever controls your speech is your master, not your equal.

Friday, June 16, 2017

Alex Jones and Megyn Kelly

I have known about Alex Jones for about ten years. I became aware of him because of a man named William Cooper. Mr. Cooper did a radio series on Mystery Babylon which basically gave the history and beliefs of occult groups throughout history. It was a good series and I have an interest in secret societies. Now, Mr. Cooper and I would not agree on a whole lot of things; but, his series is well worth listening to. Mr. Cooper also claimed that Mr. Jones was an alarmist and a liar.

YouTube - Bill Cooper Says Alex Jones Is a NWO Shill.

Mr. Cooper was bigger than Jones at the time; but, Mr. Cooper was killed by police a month or two after 9-11. After Cooper died Jones continued to get bigger and is now one of the largest voices on the "alt right". Cooper and Jones had roughly the same audience, a sort of Libertarian, super-Patriot, distrustful of the government approach.

I prefer not to post videos by Jones, I posted the one with Brad Sherman because my post was about Mr. Sherman and I wondered why he had gone on Mr. Jones show as politically they have nothing in common. I think I know the answer and the timing had a lot to do with it.

Back to Mr. Jones. Mr. Jones started getting a lot of discussion in the mainstream corporate media during and since the election. Then during a custody battle with his wife the mainstream media made it an issue and lied about what had transpired in court. It was obvious what the corporate media was doing, they were setting Jones up for constant attacks. They wanted people to stop listening to him and only listen to the corporate mainstream media, the same reason they went after internet comedian and gamer PewDePie (who by the way has vastly more followers than Jones or anyone on television.

Well, apparently weeks ago Megyn Kelly contacted Jones and wanted him for an interview for her new show. He agreed to go on and taped the interview himself. Megyn Kelly is supposed to air the interview this Sunday. She posted a preview of the upcoming interview.

Now, the preview made it absolutely clear that she went after him over things he said about Sandy Hook and she should have. As a consequence of NBC posting the preview Kelly was criticized for interviewing him at all.

There were plenty of other people in the media who said the interview should not be on air. In addition, advertisers pulled their ads from the show. Even Mr. Jones told her not to air it because it would be unfairly edited.

Now Jones is stating that he will air the complete interview unedited. By the way, Jones has been interviewed before my mainstream media, he was even interviewed by Piers Morgan and nobody complained about it. So why all the controversy now? Nobody complained when Brad Sherman went on his show after the TARP bailout. He was even on Jessie Ventura's show multiple times.

The media is pushing Jones as the anti-government conspiracy guy. Why? The media says he is followed by millions of people; but, in fact he has 2 million subscribers to his channel and many people will only watch others on his channel. What was the genesis of all of this? The White House gave a press pass to someone working for Jones' network and the media did not like that or the fact that others outside the mainstream media were allowed into the White House press briefings.

Sunday, June 11, 2017

Congressman Brad Sherman Should Be Removed From Office

Sometimes I regret that I deleted the first two versions of this blog. Not long after the stock market crash I wrote a couple of posts about Congressman Brad Sherman of California. I actually live in his district; but, did not at the time of the crash. I did write about him since starting this blog anew "Brad Sherman in the News". I wrote that in July of 2010. It was a follow-up with little detail.

I found out about Mr. Sherman during the voting on the TARP bailout of the banks. Here is a clip of what he said at the time.

He then went on the Alex Jones Show to talk about his statement in congress. When the TARP bill came out he was quoted as saying that people had told certain congressmen that if they did not pass the TARP bill that Martial Law would be instituted.

And how did Mr. Sherman vote? GovTrack - H.R. 384 (111th): TARP Reform and Accountability Act of 2009.  He voted to approve the bill. On his website it only states, "According to USA Today and The Washington Post, Congressman Sherman led the effort to prevent taxpayer dollars from being used for unlimited bailouts to Wall Street giants." Which sort of implies that he voted against it when in fact he voted for it; but, lets look a little deeper at Mr. Sherman.

Here is a link to his official Brad Sherman Resume.  He graduated in Law Magna Cum Laude from Harvard and even taught at the Harvard Law International Tax Program. He is a smart man and in addition to being a lawyer and worked at one of the big four CPA firms. He has even been on the Financial Services Committee since 1997.

So here we have Mr. Sherman and legal and financial expert and how did he vote when it came to repealing Glass Steagall? GovTrack - S. 900 (106th): Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act. He voted to repeal Glass Steagall which resulted in the economic bubble and crash because it allowed banks to gamble with your money, with your pension money and the economy as a whole. This financial and legal expert was partly responsible for the crash.

The truth is that Mr. Sherman is either incompetent or worse. Why would someone who understood finance not understand what would happen if Glass Steagall were elimina when anyone knowing financial history knew that getting rid of it was a bad idea for the majority of us and would only benefit the banks. After eliminating Glass Steagall, Mr. Sherman was still on the Financial Services Committee and did not raise alarms when the economy saw a inverted yield curve, the number one indicator that a crash is coming.

Investopia - The Impact of an Inverted Yield Curve.

Now Mr. Sherman has announced that he is going to file articles of impeachment against President Trump. Fox - Reps. Green and Sherman announce plan to file articles of impeachment. This is ludicrous. One person I respect in congress is Dennis Kucinich. He is to the left of the Democratic party and is a true progressive and what did he have to say? Kucinich said, “It is destructive to America to proceed with an impeachment at this stage of the presidency” Kucinich, a Fox News contributor, said last month. “This is not the first thing you reach for, because when the first big move a party makes is towards impeachment, it’s very difficult for the American people to conclude that it is anything but a partisan issue.”

To be fair, I believe Sherman is returning a favor to congressman Al Green. Mr. Green called for it first and Sherman is the only congressman joining him on this current push. Hmmmm. Oh yeah they serve on the Financial Services committee together. Below is a video of Mr. Sherman discussing his calling for impeachment.

I want to review what Mr. Sherman said at this press conference. At 9:05 into the video, Mr. Sherman begins by saying that this is like Watergate and that the files that were stolen were electronic ones. He then states that the theft of files was done by Russian citizens; but, the truth is we have no evidence of that. The truth is that the FBI has not been allowed to examine the DNC server. The only people to see the server were from a private contractor to the DNC. Oddly enough Mr. Sherman does not insist that the DNC server be given to the FBI so that it can be examined by them. Also, we should remember that WikiLeaks has said the information was provided to them and was not hacked. Kim Dotcom has stated that he was involved in it and that Seth Rich was the leaker.

Not being able to prove that the DNC was hacked or by whom, Mr. Sherman says the Presidents crime is covering up the theft. If you cannot prove a crime you cannot prove a cover-up. You cannot be guilty of covering up something that didn't happen. Mr. Sherman goes on to say that they only need "probable cause" to impeach. Probable cause can be defined as it is more likely than not that someone is guilty of specific actions constituting a crime. NOT UNSUBSTANTIATED RUMORS. No prosecutor would propose what Mr. Sherman and Green meets the ground for taking someone to court.

Mr. Sherman likes to play it fast and loose with the law and the truth. He states that judges have been impeached for being drunk on the bench and that it is not a crime. Should we have impeached President Obama for drinking beer? Trump doesn't drink. A drunk judge cannot do his job, there is no similarity between the two. Judges can get impeached for failure to be able to do their jobs and that includes senility and Mr. Sherman knows that and was intentionally being misleading. Mr. Sherman then goes on to say that based upon rumors in the New York Times he believes Trump's meeting with Mr. Comey may have impeachable. There is a big problem with this as the Times article was wrong and under oath Mr. Comey explicity stated that he was never told to stop an investigation and that he had assured Mr. Trump on three occasions that he was not investigating him.

The truth of the matter is, and I reported on it at the time, that for over a year people have been discussing impeaching Trump if he were to be elected. Whether you like Trump or hate him there is a bigger issue at stake and that is democracy and the right of the people to choose their President as laid out in the constitution. Mr. Sherman is seeking to pervert the law to achieve a political goal and he knows it.

There is a guy named Alan Dershowitz, he is a very famous law school professor, he teaches at Harvard and agrees that there is no case for going after Trump at the moment. According to him, it doesn't matter why Trump fired Comey, he had a constitutional right to and Dershowitz is not a Trump supporter. ANYONE, who is against Democracy is your enemy and Brad Sherman is against Democracy and your right to pick your representatives. That's a problem. We should never allow someone to represent us in congress that does not believe we have the right to pick our representatives. Mr. Sherman is more than welcome to post a comment and I will publish it as long as there is no profanity or claims that a specific person broke a law without proof, the same way I deal with everyone else on this blog including how I deal with accusations in Pastor Carol Daniels murder. I do not do rumors as fact.


I woke up this morning and Mr. Sherman had submitted his article of impeachment for consideration. I am linking to a copy of the actual submittal for your reference.

Impeaching Donald John Trump, President of the United States, for high crimes and misdemeanors.

Specifically the article claims that Trump requested that Comey stop investigating Russian involvement in our election. The problem is that it never happened according to Comey and even if it had, it would not be a crime. The truth is that the President gets to tell the FBI Director what to do.

I need to be clear. I don't need to like Trump or his policies to believe in our right to pick our President.

Thursday, June 8, 2017

New Post Coming About Brad Sherman

I was writing this post about Congressman Brad Sherman and really getting into his past, which I have written about before. He is one of the people responsible for the economic crash and is now asking for Trump to be impeached. I have been following this little weasel for years and wrote about him multiple times years ago. He hasn't changed, he is still a corporate shill.

So, I was writing about him and got distracted, had to talk to someone. I am like 90% finished with what I was going to post about him and am too tired to finish it tonight. I will finish it tomorrow and post it. This guy deserves to be removed from office. Not because of the impeachment garbage; but, because he is such a shill.

Politics is a business and you sell yourself to the interests that you like or that pay you the most. There is a balance between those benefits; but, you still up selling your influence, that is politics as an industry. Mr. Sherman sold out us all to benefit the interest of a few. Mr. Sherman is a Judas sheep. If I were to meet him I would ask him about the Logan Act and his association with him basically lobbying for another country while in office.

Now my longtime readers know, the Pimpernel doesn't pick fights or sling accusations he cannot back up. My readers know I never called for Obama's impeachment; but, I did say that Bush was a traitor because of the Patriot Act. I believe in the right of the people to pick their representatives. Mr. Sherman does not and that makes him as bad as Bush. Left or right does not matter, corporate shills are corporate shills.

I need another day to finish the post because he has proven himself bad enough to be worthy of my full attention.

Tuesday, June 6, 2017

Smart Cities and Automated Labor.

Curbed Los Angeles - City Council votes to dedicate $27M to Vision Zero, its plan to end traffic deaths.  Vision Zero, ever hear of it? Nope, you probably have not. It is a multinational plan, not a Los Angeles plan, not a state plan and not a national plan. It's avowed purpose is to make streets safer; but, it's real intent is to make the streets friendly to self-driving vehicles and keep personal vehicles out of the major cities. They don't tell you that. Here is a couple of lines from the article.

"Buscaino said he wants to prepare LA for driverless cars with a “smart streets” strategy, which could employ sensors, kiosks, and other tech designed for automated vehicles.

(It should be noted that if the streets were truly smart, they would also be dramatically reduced in size, as autonomous vehicles will not need as much on-street parking and the ability to share them would mean far fewer cars on the road.)" Yep, your tax money at work to stop you from using the roads."

Smart Cities DivePump the brakes: Cities aim to eliminate traffic fatalities with Vision Zero goals. Some general information about which cities are instituting Vision Zero.

Los Angeles Daily News - Botts’ Dots, after a half-century, will disappear from freeways, highways. You know the little bumps that are used to separate lanes and remind you that you are crossing into another lane, they are going to get rid of them and thereby make it safer for self-driving cars and more dangerous for human controlled cars. Do you see the pattern to all of this yet?

FOX - Stan the robotic parking valet gets to work at Paris airport.

Yahoo - AFP - First robotic cop joins Dubai police.  Robotic cops do what they are told. Do you think repressive governments will use them to control people? Just think how many people Stalin, Hitler and Mau could have killed with no regrets and no push back from the police or soldiers.

MSN - MarketwatchWhen Bill Gates and Mark Zuckerberg sound the same dire warning about jobs, it’s time to listen.  They ask a simple question, how will people find a sense of purpose when their labor is no longer needed. As the article points out, the issue of a laborless future is being looked at today by CEOs. For me the problem is that the majority people can't see it coming or be involved in the discussion until they do.

Reuters - Waymo working on self-driving trucks.  Waymo is part of Google.

The Kansas City Star - About half of all U.S. retail jobs could vanish due to computerization, analysis finds. The real issue of the future will not be a minimum wage, it will be any wage.

Daily MailArtificial intelligence will outperform humans in all tasks in just 45 years and could take over EVERY job in the next century, experts claim.  This is what is driving all of the changes you are seeing and you don't know it. - Elon Musk: Automation Will Force Universal Basic Income. Must is one of the good guys; but, "conservatives" hate his idea. The money won't come from your taxes because you won't have a job.

The big question remains. What do we do as a society when we no longer need people's labor. It is a moral question and a structural one and if you don't think about it, you will not have a say in it.

Read more here:

Monday, June 5, 2017

London Bridge Attack and the Globalist Perspective

Lots of people are wondering why the governments of Europe refuse to address the issue of how Muslim immigration from the poorest Arab countries of the least educated people from those countries is effecting their nations. Your average conservative will say it is because they are letting radicals into their country and that is true to a degree; but, most of the people who committed terror attacks in England were second generation and were radicalized in the United Kingdom. Liberals will tell you we just have to be more tolerant of their cultures, to be multi-cultural rather than adopt English culture as the Indians and Pakistani's have in the past. They mayor of London has said that terror attacks are just the reality of life in modern European cities. On it's face that is insanity; but, he actually meant it because he doesn't believe in borders and he understands that will be one of the consequences.

The assumption I begin with in politics is that things come about because the people in power want them to. Who benefits must always be the question, follow the money that determines what happens. The perspective of all globalists and the European Union is that having many groups in constant conflict has a value beyond bringing in new cuisines. What is the value they find in it economically and socially? Lets start by looking at Theresa May's (the English Prime Minister) response to the murders on the London bridge by Muslim extremists.

Time - Read Prime Minister Theresa May's Full Speech on the London Bridge Attack.

What did she blame the attacks on? Firstly she blamed it on sectarianism (religion, any religion that people believe in). Her solution is constant and growing internal security and surveillance. The second cause she found for the violence was the internet. She said it allowed people to gather and discuss wrong ideas. Her solution is to internationally regulate what you can say online and monitor all your online communications to make sure your not a bad person. She then states that we must attack ISIS in Syria; but, Syria was not involved in ANY of the three attacks that England has experienced in the last three months alone or ever. Her fourth solution is longer detainment for people not found guilty of crimes but suspected of thinking about committing a terrorist act. In fact, there had been discussions and a trial balloon floated at the idea of suspending the English elections.

John Oliver of Last Week Tonight posted a clip from his show last night where he talked about the London bridge attack, he laughed and said the English way was to laugh it off and said the real threat was Putin. I saved the clip; but, it is no longer up, I am sure it will pop up somewhere. Yep, found another copy.

These things just don't disappear. He starts by saying that "In no way is Britain under siege", just upset. How many people were killed in the last three irritating events, how many at the Manchester bombing alone? He literally laughs at the idea that some Britain' s might be worried or concerned. He claimed that the Britain's are more upset by people making tea in a microwave than the terror attacks. He then shows a gay man in England whos says that he will keep doing what he does because he won't let the terrorists win. Fair enough; but, they didn't ask this gay man if he felt threatened by the extreme Muslims who attack gays. He ends by saying that the biggest threat to the United States is Putin and Trump and that Putin had said that some Russians could have been involved in hacking the DNC; but, that is not quite what he said, just how Oliver summarized it. 

After 9-11 happened Jon Stewart and others gave heart felt sorrow and expressions of love for their city, Oliver didn't do that, he laughed about what happened in London, watch the video, he made fun of it and then attacked Trump and Putin. This man has sold his soul and wants to sell you on the establishment agenda while appearing to be anti-establishment. He also thought Britain leaving the EU was the worst thing that has ever happened, yet he left Britain and the EU. Lets not forget that he works for one of the six multinational companies that own 90% of all the media in the United States.

Here is a few questions for you. If we are facing overpopulation then why increase the number of people in Europe by immigration? If we have a problem with greenhouse gasses in the west than why increase the number of people through immigration and thereby increase the greenhouse gas emissions from those same countries? If we cannot assimilate people without terror attacks than why bring in more people who don't agree with western beliefs and not require them to assimilate? What is the benefit? 

I want to focus on the media for a second. I am going to post a video by a guy I find amusing but frequently think oversimplifies things.

I will not post it; but, Alex Jones has an even longer copy of the tape of the staging of this event. Specifically CNN was involved in arranging a show of support from what we are told Muslims for London and against terrorists. They also made it appear to be spontaneous, which it wasn't.

The Muslims did not crash the world economy, neither did the gays, the jews, xenophobes, Nazi's or Putin or Trump or Melania or Ivanka or the illegal aliens. Nope, it was the western banks that crashed the economy and rigged the markets afterwards. It was after the worldwide markets crashed that we attacked Libya, Syria and everyone else in the middle east. A distraction. By sending them to the west we have brought in a new boogie man so that we will ignore the real boogieman, our wealthy and our leaders.