Monday, October 14, 2019

The Death of Fairness Under the Law.

“We want to make sure that we meet the needs of the investigation and not give the president or his legal minions the opportunity to tailor their testimony and in some cases fabricate testimony to suit their interests,” the California Democrat said Sunday on CBS’s “Face the Nation.”

Wow. The above quote came from Adam Schiff. They don't believe the President should be allowed to know what he is being accused of or by whom. Think about that. Only totalitarians treat the accused that way.

Yahoo - Bloomberg - Schiff says secret testimony aimed at keeping Trump in the dark.

Friday, October 11, 2019

It is not media bias, it is propaganda.

There are countries where you are presumed guilty until proven innocent. Our government is based upon the principal that you are innocent unless proven guilty "beyond a reasonable doubt". This is to prevent the government from prosecuting people based on their political beliefs. This is why we require "probable cause" to even investigate someone. The heart of our criminal justice system is built on the need to ensure a fair trial. A fair trial means the accused: A- Gets the right to confront their accuser; B - Has the right to question witnesses: C - Has the right to have an attorney represent with them: D - Has the right to show additional information: E - Has the right to see all the evidence to be used against them in advance of the trial: F - Has the right to know what they are being charged with once the accusations are charged. This is why you are given a reading of "your rights" (Miranda rights) upon arrest. For the first time in our history, NONE of these rights are being provided to President Trump and the media and the neo-liberals and the neo-cons are all okay with that. Fundamental to making these rights have meaning is the right to talk to you attorney in privacy.

The media and the establishment scream on a daily basis that Trump asking for the same rights is "obstruction of congressional oversight" except, they are not doing oversight, they say they are conducting an "Official Impeachment Inquiry"; but they do not use the word "Formal" because that means you have to follow the rules, the form and that requires that you give due process. The inquiry being done is not official as it has not been sanctioned by the House by vote. By the way, this is still not my post on the Ukraine "scandal". This post is also not just about the impeachment witch hunt. It is about what rules we will all live under.

The second the courts say the President does not have rights to due process, it means you don't either. Many people don't care and that is scary. We are seeing the perversion of fairness. Consider the French revolution, a commoner would point to someone they disliked and say, "I accuse of helping the royals" and they would be hung as guilty, no proof needed. The Soviet Union had a presumption until proven guilty so did the Nazi's. For the past few decades the establishment has been pushing us in that direction. The "#MeToo" movement has clearly said that we should believe all women, something clearly ludicrous to anyone who has lived in a house of women where they constantly call each liars. They don't really believe we should believe all women, they believe we shouldn't believe anything men say.

The same establishment saying Trump is guilty till proven innocent doesn't accept Mueller's finding that Trump did not collude with Russia in the 2016 election. Just a small offside point, the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) which has fought for the rights of Nazi's and Communists has remained completely silent on the Trump inquiry. I have supported those clowns for 50 years and now find them cowards and partisans, rather than protectors of civil rights. I should also mention that in court you cannot use second hand account (someone told me garbage), you have to have heard or witnessed something first hand to testify on it.

You might wish to believe that the denial of basic rights to Trump is one time thing; but, it would be precedent and means it can happen to everyone at anytime. I will tell you this, the Supreme Court will NOT enforce these so called congressional "subpoenas" if they do not comport to and allow for due process. The Democrats in congress know this, that is why they are trying to say "Obstruction of Congressional Oversight" is their charge against Trump without having an underlying crime. The truth is denying someone due process is an obstruction of justice.

For new readers, I did not and don't intend to vote for Trump. I have not voted for a Bush or Clinton. The Nazi's were given more rights during the Nuremberg trials where they were accused of the holocaust.

Thursday, October 10, 2019

Syria and the Kurds

The Kurds are a distinct ethnic group that used to have a nation; but, lost it. It was broken up after World War I. The Kurds ended up in Turkey, Syria and Iran. There are about 50 million of them and they do not have their own nation. ISIS was an enemy of both the Kurds and the Syrian government. The Kurds fought the members of ISIS and we helped them. ISIS was ended and the Kurds wanted independence from Syria and Turkey, basically, they want to create their own country and are willing to have a civil war to do so.

After ISIS was defeated we reduced troops working with the Kurds until we had only 50 left in the area and Trump removed them too. The media has been claiming that we "abandoned" the Kurds; but, we only worked with them to fight ISIS, not to participate in their civil wars in Syria and Turkey. The Kurds and the Turkish were involved in the genocide of Armenians in the past.

Trump removed 50 soldiers from the area and other countries questioned the move. Hmmm, Australia could send 50 more soldiers there, the EU countries could too. I have never discussed why I distrust Trump on this blog, I have merely said I didn't vote for him and wouldn't. I like the fact he is anti-globalism and did not approve the TPP. I do believe that the elites hate Trump because he is against globalism and that is their main problem with him. Bernie Sanders was against those thing too, which is why the DNC cheated him.

Here is what matter, we don't have a treaty with the Kurds, we do with Turkey, in fact they are our partners in NATO. The Kurds have attacked Turkey from inside and outside the country. Technically, as a member of NATO, an attack upon one is an attack upon all. If we stayed in northern Syria and fought with the Kurds against Turkey, we would be guilty of attacking a NATO country, think about that. The reality is, Turkey wants to take over the northern part of Syria where the Kurds are. Supposedly we want to have a regime change in Syria, so what is the problem? Unless we are going to fight for an independent Kurdish nation and take away part of Turkey, why were we still there? Does anyone really want to go to war with Turkey over creating a new country for the Kurds?

I have been patiently saving articles and preparing to write about the "Ukrainian Call Scandal" but I am not ready to post yet. I am waiting on a couple of more shoes to drop. I will say this, Trump committed no crime and none has been specified by his opponents which is why they are not prepared to write articles of impeachment.