Occupy the World - How Change Happens

76% of the people in the United States think the system is broke. 76% of the people are unhappy with the direction this country is taking including the people that have jobs. The obvious truth is obvious and true. Other than a few politicians who have been paid well to keep the status quo, who likes what is going on in this country?

The media continues to hasten the downfall of the system by denying that anything is wrong. I bet with almost no effort I can list at least five things that the right and left agree upon regarding how this country and it's elite are failing us.

1. Eliminate the Federal Reserve and put an end to our currency being controlled by a private banking institution. That is a very popular aim of the both the Tea Party and Occupy Wall Street.

2. Stop sending our children to wars for oil. Yep, everybody is tired of war.

3. Tax the rich at least as much as you tax everyone else.

4. Limit the amount that people can inherit. People don't mind success, they don't mind people like Steve Jobs or Bill Gates EARNING any amount, they don't really like to see someone inherit a few billion dollars tax free through trust funds and then looking down on the rest of us.

5. Stop allowing monied interests from buying our politicians votes. Yep, can't find too many people in favor of buying off politicians.

6. There is way to much monitoring and control over the average citizen life. Cut back on the cameras and the involvement in our day to day lives, it feels oppressive.

7. Don't ask us to work until we are dead for pennies. And while you are at it, stop stealing our pension money, we worked for it.

8. Don't set up one set of laws for the poor and middle class and another for your friends and those who can pay you off. We all see it and we see it all the time.

9. Stop sending our jobs and technology to other countries. If you are an American company than you should hire within America.

10. Don't turn this into a third world country just so the people who are rich can be richer.

This may not be the most eloquent post I have ever written; but, you probably get the point. I talk to conservatives and liberals and these are the things I hear. In the end, people are frustrated because they feel they are being wronged and that they are being lied to. They have tried to change the laws and that didn't work. They have tried to hold peaceful assemblies and replace the crooks on Washington and that didn't work. They are now holding peaceful assemblies just to air their complaints and that doesn't seem to be working either. So what now?

I saw a sign for Occupy L.A., it said, "Capitalism is working just fine, now what?" That sort of summed it up for me. It is the sort of general feeling that if this is the system working well, we have nothing to lose. Ignore the word capitalism, for this is a perversion of that system, this is pure and simple old school "good boy" networks where you have to be connected to get anything.

Warren Buffet said that this is class warfare and that the rich are winning. He was not being sarcastic and he was not in favor of it. He is one of the three richest men in the world, sort of. For all of the money that Mr. Buffet has made, there are families that are much richer and you don't know who controls their money because it is all hidden in trust funds.

When I hear staunch Republican conservatives tell me that they think we are going to see revolution and that they are disgusted with the system, the system has lost it's biggest supporters. The complaints, in the end, are not about capitalism, the complaints are about how the democratic process and our republican form of government has been perverted and taken over by a few for the benefit of the few.

I myself don't really care about politics anymore. That is to say that I think what is going to happen is going to happen. We live in an oligarchy, that is where the few are in charge of everything. In Political Science it is called the Iron Rule of Oligarchy. It means that all societies eventually devolve into control by a few and then you have revolution. It can take a week, a month, a year or many years; but, once the support of the general populace has been lost, it is just a matter of time.

Societies end in one of two ways. Either they are taken over by outside sources or they have a civil war and are taken over by the populace. While this may sound shocking, the truth is that there is a large number of people who manage this society that want it to fail, sort of. There is and has been taught for many decades the belief that we should have a one world government. For many years people doubted this; but, the internet has allowed this to be openly exposed.

One of the most conservative and respected newscasters in history told us so after he retired. Walter Cronkite - YouTube. I will give you the short answer. Mr. Cronkite was a supporter of a one world government for decades and when he retired, an organization that was working behind the scenes to achieve such a thing, gave him an award.

I am reminded of something while I watch the news. During the Irish Potato famine there was an opinion piece in the New York Times, it said that the famine might be the solution to the "Irish Problem". The Irish (I am Irish) didn't like starving or living under English rule, they didn't like it being illegal to speak our language and didn't like having all their property taken away and given to foreigners. The article basically said that letting them all starve to death would resolve the problem. Nothing left to lose except your life.

We have 30 million people unemployed in this country and an insane amount of people needing government assistance just to eat. There are calls in congress to limit food subsidies for the poor. How many people are you willing to watch starve to death when there is enough food to feed everyone? Will it solve the homeless problem, the unemployment problem or the poverty problem and is that an answer that you can live with?

When you hear people make fun of the Occupy Wall Street movement, ask them how many people they are willing to watch starve to death in the United States. I know what Jesus will ask, he will say when he was hungry you did not feed him and when he was cold you did not clothe him. He will then say that he never knew you.

People need to understand that you cannot hurt or anger all of the people all of the time, this is pretty simple stuff to understand. I shall explain one of the risks. If the people who are unhappy with the way things are begin using the same techniques as the wealthy to take down the system, it will fall like bricks. What if they began paying those who work for the system to tell on the system, a crook is a crook. There is no honor among thieves.

When three fourths of the people believe the country is headed in the wrong direction and are sick and tired of being abused, you had better find a way to have class agreement rather than class warfare. Lets consider that for a minute, let me explain how we are looked at. We have heard congressmen say that the president is promoting class warfare, that means that they believe their are different classes of citizens. I don't recall that in the Constitution. A class system is one in which your rights are determined by your wealth and your congress believes in it.

This is how change happens. When you start ignoring the masses and increasing your open control and disregard for the system then they cease believing in it also. The 60's protests were simple compared to what is coming, those protests were issue driven and this protest is about how wrong the whole system is. The left believes the system is corrupt and perverted and the right believes the system is corrupt and perverted, so, why does the media insist that everything is okay?

The Powers that Be are really confused about now

In Oakland the police disbanded an Occupy Oakland encampment. They also managed to shoot an Iraq war veteran. Acorn didn't shoot the veteran and the Communists didn't shoot the veteran, the Jews did not shoot the veteran, nope, the police shot the man and he hadn't done anything other than stand in the street. When these things happen, there are consequences.

YouTube - Occupy Phoenix:Veterans with AR15s keeping the occupation safe

Hundreds of marines and ex-marines have been discussing what happened on Reddit

How I feel, as a United States Marine, about what occurred in Oakland.

After the Oakland suppression occurred, the protesters returned the next day. Fearing more bad publicity the idiot of a mayor said that she was glad that everything worked out peacefully and that they could stay a little longer. Do you understand how stupid and laughable that sounds to everybody.

Today the media had articles all across the United States about how expensive it was to the poor cities and counties to have to have the police on overtime. They are appealing to people's pocketbook; but, people who are unemployed or barely employed don't really care and the police are happy to get the overtime.

I have no political affiliations, gave that once I saw how corrupt the system is. I conduct church on Sundays and am a pacifist. Anybody who has followed this blog or reads the older posts can see that I am clearly not a Communist or a member of Acorn or a hippy or stupid or unwilling to work. My salary had me in the top 5% income bracket for people who actually work for a living (as opposed to true income, trust funds for the elite). I am not a member of Occupy anything other than occupy yourself with service. I am however a student of history.

I mention the above because I want my reader to understand my position and I do have one. I believe that Jesus taught us to be good slaves. At the same time I understand the position of the Tea Partiers and Occupy movements. People are sheep and always have been, that is the vast majority of people. The majority just found out that they are sheep when they thought they were not and they don't like it. My job in life has always been the one of a sheepdog. Protect the sheep and make sure we are headed in the direction the shepherd is taking us. I don't like the shepherd, he is a hired hand and does not care about the sheep. They are bad shepherds. For those of you who know your bible, you will understand what I am saying.

Here is where the problem begins, I will not be a sheepdog for swine pretending to be shepherds. The sheepdog does not hate the sheep, they hate him; but, he does not hate them, his joy is in helping his shepherd; but, not when the shepherd harms the sheep wrongly. The police are supposed to be sheepdogs; but, some will act like predators. What happens when there are too many predators, you have no sheep and the shepherd dies too. Of course this is an analogy; but; it is God's analogy. The people who truly own everything have forgotten the basics. Sheep are sheep and sometimes they won't listen. What do you do when the sheepdogs don't listen also? You lose. That is what you do because you cannot get anything done.

I speak in parables, analogies and nonsense; but, what I say is true. I know my history. When plain speak fails to get attention and examples are ignored then history repeats itself. Life for many will soon be bad. You cannot ignore the sheep and sheepdogs no longer care what you think. You do not lead sheep to fields of thistles, even the sheepdog knows that. What happens when nobody listens, there are no shepherds. Don't hurt the sheep or it all goes bad for all.

This sounds familiar

I don't have much time to post; but, I read these two articles and they stated quite nicely things that I have posted on in the last two weeks. It is almost as if they had read my stuff and expanded on it. It means that others see the Occupy movement and the Tea Party movement in the same way and it is far from over.

Huffington Post - How the Legal System Was Deep-Sixed and Occupy Wall Street Swept the Land

Huffington POst - Occupy Wall Street as Seen Through Machiavelli's Lens

What is the point, it should be obvious. The government has legalized for the privledged what is illegal for anyone else. As it gets exposed more and more, rather than correct the problems, our politicians tell us that this is the way it should be for the "job creators". This is particularly amusing as the jobs they create are in other countries.

In Oakland the police have removed the Occupy Oakland people from their encampment (in an illegal manner by the way). They were given less rights than the homeless in violation of State Law. The police removed them; but, did not let them take their possessions and that is not legal in California. The police in Oakland also shot a Iraq vet with a plastic bullet in the head. What do you think would happen in court if that had been done during a homeless cleanup? It happened while people were chanting, "You are supposed to protect us". The police are supposed to protect and serve the citizens, not the powers that be.

The media just continues to lie. First they called the protesters Communists, then Anti-Jewish and now they all supposedly work for Acorn. Can you imagine how stupid that sounds to the protesters or the people that know them? I guess next week the media will say they are Nazi sympathizers. Throwing everything against the wall to see if something will stick merely shows desperation and exposes the insincerity of the media.

What a dweeb Rick Perry is

Lets be clear, I don't care who wins the election, this is not about them, it is about the process. The electoral process is one in which we vote for the best of the worst because we make the wrong choices along the way. Rick Perry should never have been a candidate for President, none of them should, they are all against the average person and they all believe in privilege, they all believe that a few should be allowed to avoid the law rather than benefit from what they have done for people who have earned it.

Mr. Perry talks about how "bold" he is; but, he is still their shill (as they say in Las Vegas (look up shill in WikiPedia). Rick Perry's message (according to CNBC is “I hope what they will see is that America's a fabulous country and it gives them the opportunity to go say your piece, go protest on the street. But at the end of the day America's about having the opportunity to take care of your family.” Is that what it is about, is America about ensuring that if you work hard you will have comfort, I don't see it for the Baby Boomers, I don't see it for me and I don't see it for those that are younger than me. I don't see it.

Go back and read all my posts, I am willing to give up for those that will live longer and that is what this is all about. It is about making the fight something about a group rather than the rules of the game. It is about making a privledged class by birth rather than by right, if we avoid both than we choose randomness and that nobody can succeed. What rule of life does that look like and why bother doing anything if we are penalized for success and not rewarded for sacrifice? Is that the world you wish to live in? Or is it only the world you wish to live in if you "win"?

Propaganda and Lies, how to know

A few decades ago an expert in propaganda spoke at my school. It was during the cold war and he was sent to teach us how to spot communist propaganda; but, all propaganda is the same, the methodology.

Today, I was reading the L.A. Times online and saw something funny. The top article in the section I saw said, "Student loans add to angst at Occupy Wall Street". Fair enough, it talked about how many of the protesters in their 20s were faced with student loan debts and no job prospects. The article right under it said, "Obama to reduce student loan debt payments". Isn't that nice.

The first article was published at 8:08 and the second at 8:11 and they were written by two different people. The one about how Obama is going to reduce payments, that was the first article; but, it showed up second. This is a case of problem, reaction and solution. It is an example of trying to buy people off. It would have been much easier for one person to write both stories, heck they were published at about the exact same time. I have to believe that the L.A. Times had an editor and knew they were both being published.

Anyways, one of the things we were taught was to look at how articles were grouped together. Let's say every time you read an article about a person, lets say Obama, every time you read an article about there is an article about prostitution next to it. This is a very subtle way of implying a connection when none exists. That is one of the tools of propaganda. I will not call it subliminal because you are aware of what the article says in a conscious manner, it is more conditioned response.

If I want you to find some food disgusting then every time I feed you the food, lets say tacos, I will put a foul smell in the air, lets say dead fish. I am attempting to get you to have what is called a Pavlovian response. In this case, they are attempting to buy off the Occupy Wall Street crowd by reducing their student loan payments. They are attempting to get us to believe that this is what they 20 somethings are really mad about; but, it isn't and it isn't going to work or change one darn thing. It is funny that this comes out the same day that the Oakland police and other cities began cracking down on the protesters. This is what you do to see if you can keep them from coming back, you throw them a cookie.

It is so pitiful watching the wealthy try and confuse those who have nothing and those who have lost everything. It doesn't work that way. Those in power never understood why they were in power, they thought it was because they knew how to manage people, it was not, it was so that they could help people grow in a civilized manner. It was never about keeping them down, it was about growing them properly. When the leadership no longer helps to grow a civilization then the civilization rises up and gets rid of the leaders or it dies along with it's leaders. It is very Darwinian, very Toynbee and very much nature.

The purpose of leaders is not greater rewards for those who give more, that should occur; but, should never be the leader's reason. A leader should always be a leader because he believes in his society more than his importance. We are corrupt because our leaders no longer believe that.

A population, a citizenship's purpose should always be to contribute to make the society closer and stronger and to choose leaders (if they have developed to that degree) that will look at the greater good rather than the good of just those who will get them elected. The citizenship is also corrupted. If we want a great society, then both the leadership and the people must be willing to give of themselves for the greater good of all.

Let's hear it for Pension Abuse

The Los Angeles Times had the following to say, "Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa has grown increasingly bold — some say too aggressive — in his attempts to influence panels that guide the city's huge retirement funds."

Los Angeles Times - Villaraigosa puts teeth into his stand on pension funds

You should read the article, as always; but, here is the short. The Mayor appoints the majority of the people to the Pension Board, now mind you this is not City money, it is a trust fund. In the past the Mayor has appointed all sort of people to the Boards including the since convicted Elliot Broidy. Thes same Boards have lost millions and millions in "alternative investments".

The Los Angeles Times article said that a couple of Board members were removed for voting against the Mayor. This is an easy, if the Mayor's members vote on bad ideas, lose additional millions and are found guilty of anything then he has violated the trust and should be charged with such.

This is exactly the type of thing that is bothering both the Tea Party and the people of the Occupy movement. I hope everyone on the City Hall lawn reads about it.

A Slight Fever

I went to church yesterday and was find; but, by the time I got home I couldn't eat and developed a fever. Darn thing kept me up all night with the chills and the sweats. I still haven't slept and I trying to stay awake so I can sleep tonight. I say this by way of explaining if my writing isn't very good.

I was reading the news and came across more stupidity from the media. Occupy Wall Street and the others are not about seeking an answer, it is about identifying the unifying truth for most of us, we are not treated fairly and insiders run the show. It is not anti-capitalist (though some may be), it is not anti-government (though many are against our current form of government) and it is better to consider what it is about, what it is in favor of.

These protesters and most people in the country feel they have been cheated. They want to be treated fairly. They don't like privileged classes. I read an article today that talked about the 1% of income earners not be mostly in the financial industry. It completely misses the point, this is not about the 1% of people getting salaries more than others, it is about the 1% that own 90% of this country, the ones who control the government and the media, not the well paid CEO's that work for them.

Now here is the answer to why they will not listen, they know what this is all about, they understand it is about changing the system to be fair and open. If you have an oligarchy there is no reason they are going to like that, it means giving up unfair control. It is about making sure that people can have a reasonable lifestyle, with reasonable freedoms and a reasonable chance to get ahead and we don't have that.

There are two kinds of special treatment, one is earned and the other is inherited. Most people would agree that the war vet who lost a leg and stole some food should be treated better than Linsey Lohan for stealing jewelry. If Steve Jobs changed the world then maybe he deserves to be treated a little better at a restaurant. Still, if he had killed his wife then we probably wouldn't support him as much. What we see are people who are given special treatment and immunity from prosecution and conviction because they have the money.

I have never liked mobs. I don't like large groups of people who are not organized in a manner that they can be reasoned with. But I know history and I know what can happen when your citizenry becomes a mob. It means that they lack confidence in the basic system. There is a need to go back to fundamentals, to fundamental justice. There is a need to stop rewarding people for bad behaviour.

The issue is not the thousands in the occupy movement, it is the 37% that support them. The percentage of people that support the current system is about 30% and that is getting lower. Stop the next ten people you meet and ask them if they think the system treats them fairly. Ask them if they think the rich get special privledges.

Moammar Gadhafi

This post may upset some people. The United States has openly admitted to torturing it's enemies. How are Bush and Obama any different that Gadhafi? He tortured people and lived extravagently while the people of Libya were highly controlled.

Gadhafi was a horrible person who believed his own lies and he did terrible things to innocent people. We do not know how many people he had tortured or killed and never will. We will know how bad he was because whatever we discover, it will be worse. He was still human, he was still an emotional, self aware being. He was still human.

I saw the video of him in his last minutes, he was bloodied, confused and being driven around on the hood of a truck for all to see. They did not rip his eyes out, cut off his nose, tongue, eyes of more delicate parts. They shot him in the head. He was not tortured as he had done to so many others, beaten; but, not truly tortured, not the really bad stuff that takes days.

As I saw him being manhandled and carried away from the truck, as he wiped the blood from his face and you could tell he was alive, he looked confused. I bet he was. He did not hate Libya and he loved Libyans, he just believed his was the only way. As sick as it is he believed he was doing what was best for Libya. He was willing to die for it, he had hundred of millions and could have left the country; but, he didn't because he believed he was supposed to be in charge to protect the country from westerners.

I never liked the man, he was a horrible person and I don't seek to justify anything he did, I am pacifist and cannot justify anything he did nor would I even try. Yet, he was still a person, he was still a bundle of emotions and urges. He still felt pain and greed and loss and emptiness and fear and joy and love and anger. All the emotions you feel, he felt. The problem was that he either did not care what others felt or thought they did not feel the same emotions as he did. God made us all in his image, we are all as complex and complete as each other.

As I watched him being walked down the street, I wondered if he understood what he had done to others. I wondered if he understood that they felt even greater pain than he was feeling. I wondered if he finally understood and felt regret for having treated others so poorly and having forgot their humanity and pain. If he did then he would felt regret and guilt and we cannot find grace, we cannot find forgiveness in our own hearts until we feel guilt and regret and are then capable of knowing forgiveness. The innocent cannot understand grace, the guilty cannot understand it, only those who are saved can be guilty and understand innocence because they know they are not. That is salvation.

Did Gadhafi finally know his guilt, if so then we should pray for his soul. We all sin; but, it is through guilt that we find salvation and it is only found in grace. I wish him grace for he will need a lot of it, I cannot imagine living with such guilt for eternity, I could not wish that on any self-aware being. I cannot only wish salvation for all, for we are all human and flawed, imperfect.

Occupy Wall Street and the Tea Party

The people that run the world, the people that set the direction for societies are scared. Unfortunately for them, they are making the same mistakes that have been made in the past when confronted by a population that is fed up and has nothing to hope for. The lies have been too many for too long and all legitimacy is being lost.

We have 30 million people without jobs in the United States, most houses are upside down, the people's retirements and pensions have been raided in order to give money to thieves on Wall Street and the government and internet are destroying and idea of privacy. All the spin in the world cannot keep people from seeing this and that is the problem for the media and those who support the status quo.

In Boston and Denver police have used force to break up peaceful demonstrations. This type of response will only have one effect and that is to further separate the police from the people and that is when things get worse for a society. People really need to learn from history.

We no longer live in the 1930's and people will not willingly go into permanent poverty, we have learned how to work together to protest, we learned that in the 60's and the kids of today are even better at it. People today are also much more willing to use violence.

When both the "Occupy Wall Street" and "Tea Party" began the media's first effort was to ridicule them. That is an indication of just how much the media is controlled by the status quo, by the powers that be. Next the media attempted to limit the change being sought, they spouted off about how these movements are vague and don't have clear points. They said that the movements needed to focus on a couple of specifics in order to be effective. They still don't get it, these movements are not about a couple of things, these are about people who no longer have any faith in how our society is run.

You can attempt to pit people against one another, divide and conquer; but, that doesn't work when all sides are against the system. This is not about left or right or conservative or liberal, this is a lack of confidence in all of them. While the wealthy complain that this is about class warfare they are correct, that is exactly what it is and it doesn't get better.

The issues are really simple in the end. The Tea Party movement wants what we had back again. The Tea Party wants this country to play by the rules; but, they see how the rules only apply to us and not to the wealthy or well connected. Arnold Schwarzenegger demonstrated this the most clearly when he paroled a murderer because he was the son of a political ally, Arnold said that is what you do for friends. That shows a complete contempt for the rules that apply to the rest of us. The Tea Party knows that it us against them.

The problem is that there are now two distinct societies, that is what happens when you destroy the middle class. There are the rich and the poor. The currently popular attempt by the media is to say that the protestors should really blame the baby boomers for their problems. Anything other than what it is really about, it is about the distribution or wealth and the distribution of rights.

When all else fails the media attempts to make people see things in terms of religion (think about the needless argument over whether or not Mormons are Christians, why would any politician even bother bringing it up) or race or age, they question the motives of people, they question their logic, they eventually promote the use of force and when that happens the government loses any ability to communicate with the protestors because they will no longer believe anything they are told and we are just about there.

Revolutions happen in stages, they grow into revolution when the government fails to give in to the population. 1% of the population owns 99% of everything, how could this possibly be fair? Is it fair that the rules don't apply to some of us? Is it fair that the educational system ensures that most people will never even get a chance to compete? The game is rigged and everybody knows it, the response to the protestors only exposes it more. If the police begin really being abusive to our children then they will no longer be respected.

I do not promote revolution, I remember history. It was so obvious to everyone when the protests in Egypt occurred or when they occurred in Libya, it is no different here except there haven't been any deaths yet. The protests are not going away, they are only growing and they are growing internationally. Some of the wealthy and powerful get this, Warren Buffet gets it and always has. Bloomberg does not get it, Cain does not get it. This will be a seminal moment in history, this decade will. The internet has allowed people to see just how rigged the game is and more importantly that the people in power don't care about them or fairness.

Societies need a strong middle class to survive and thrive, to grow. When you eliminate the middle class, you eliminate incentives and condone corruption at all levels. When the people in power do not follow the rules, their rules have no power.

We now have the forum for a real leader to emerge, he will be the one who is able to take the aspirations of both the Tea Party and the Occupy Wall Street crowds and combine them into a new vision of government and how we distribute wealth. People do not have a problem with people becoming successful because of hard work or being smarter, they have a problem with people becoming wealthy because the government gave them different rules than the rest of us. People have a problem with you stealing their pensions and then blaming them for your theft. The police in New York would be well advised to remember that a man who had lost tens of millions of their pension funds and then said that their pensions were too generous.

"Things fall apart, the center will not hold". Without a middle class, there is no center, there is nothing holding people together other than shared outrage. There is nobody to support because it is all just a show and the audience knows it. Let us say that we manage to avoid a revolution, what will these people teach their children? They will teach them that the system is rigged, they don't have a chance and to not trust the police. They will teach them to hate the wealthy and ignore the laws. That would be a slow death for the country.

Is there a way to correct this situation? Yes, there is; but, it requires fairness and it requires justice. One of the protestors thought that college should be free. People in the media accused him of being a socialist and crazy. Well, this country became strong because of the public education system. There is no reason for a kid to spend $150,000 to get a degree just so he can be poor. There is no incentive.

The protesters believe in private property, they believe in consumerism, they like the cookies of this world. They are mad because they no longer believe they can share in having them and that is what they are being told by the media and the government. They are being told that they will have to work till they die, not have a pension, not have adequate medical care, never own a home, go for long periods without any work and that their lot in life will not get any better. At the same time they are being told that the connected ones will have whatever they like and not have to live by the same rules.

This is not a political post, this is a post on societies and how they collapse. This is a social post. What is amusing is that the powers in the United States don't even understand why Saudi Arabia escaped a revolution, the rich began giving people more, they started sharing more of the wealth. This is not about wealth, this is about the fair distribution of wealth, this is about putting an end to rewarding people for stealing your money. This is about not wanting to reward people for bad behaviour anymore.

In some cities they have attempted to remove the protesters, as if that would somehow cause the protests to end. Activity just goes underground and our institutions get compromised and weakened. The media hopes to pit the Tea Party and the Occupy Wall Street crowds against each other, to misdirect them; but, the reasons are all too obvious and it will not work except in the theater of the absurd that we call politics and this goes beyond politics because both groups know that the middle class has been destroyed and they don't have a chance for a decent life.

Who could honestly look their child in the eye and tell them that if they work hard, educate themselves and act with integrity that they will have a decent life? That is the problem, no honest parent would say that anymore. Worse yet, who would believe them if they did tell them such a thing?

In all things act in love and in all things be peaceful.

Sometimes it is nice to know there is always hope

The world is in pretty bad shape right now and it will get worse before it gets better. I read so many news sources just to keep up with what is going on that sometimes I feel bad that times are so hard for so many. Those who have followed this blog for sometime know that I do not think things are as they should be and that I am very unhappy with somethings that are coming in the future.

Having said what I have, sometimes I come across things that remind me of how it could be and why it should be. I came across this article and video on the Huffington Post, I will link to it at the end. It is of a little girl and her birthday present. In the video the little girl is very innocent and obviously raised well. There are still families that have their priorities straight, there are still people that want to raise healthy families in love. A child who grows up in such a family remains innocent longer, you don't want them to grow up too quick.

Disneyland Birthday Surprise: Adorable 6-Year-Old Little Girl's Reaction

When life is hard, put a smile on someone else's face and you will smile too. Share joy.

We Have Finally Become "A Brave New World"

"Brave New World" is a book by Aldous Huxley. The novel is set in the future when people can clone copies of themselves to harvest them for body parts as needed. People could never imagine a society so corrupt that they would be capable of making copies of themselves just to take parts from them, they could not imagine such a think when he wrote the book.

Well ladies and gentlemen, the technology is now here. This article entitled, "Report: Stem cells created from cloned human embryos" from MSNBC is about how science can now clone you from a cell and then get stem cells from your identical embryonic self to heal you. Morally it is even more corrupt then to take the stem cells from an unknown source.

This type of thing will initially be considered the same as saving up your own blood when you are about to get surgery; but, it is more than blood, it is your biologically identical self, it is you. People will justify that it is their body and they can do with it what they want including cloning it. Truth is, it is not you, even if fully grown it will be it's own self, you do not share the same carbon molecules and are unique, you matter and so does everyone else. The corruption is in thinking that anybody doesn't matter or worse yet, thinking you are all that matters.

Women who had agreed to donate their eggs for research were paid $8,000. When the scientists for this project needed eggs the women were asked if it was okay to use it for either project, they were paid the same either way and didn't care what happened to them. This is a morality question and we need to consider it very carefully. The women basically agreed to be cloned and have their clone killed in exchange for $8,000. They agreed to be paid for murder and the cost was only $8,000. I am pretty sure they didn't look at it that way; but, that is what happened.

I do not believe in stem cell research, I do not believe in cloning, I do not believe in "upgrading" our bodies through technology. I do believe we can use technology to replace missing parts; but, not stem cell or cloning technologies. I do not believe in integrating technology with our minds. I think humans should be humans and not hybrids.

People seem to really like the vampire movies and shows these days. If you could live forever; but, it meant continually living off of new life, would you do it? That is what is so morally bankrupt about this, many will choose to be vampires.

I will give my ex-wife credit for something. She always told me that when she died she wanted to donate her body to science. She believed that the parts might be useful for others. I personally couldn't do it, I don't feel comfortable doing it and I am not sure that I would accept a body part from another person. A personal decision and I respect those who differ with me on the matter. There is a difference between giving up body parts to be incorporated into another and creating a new life. That is my moral line in the sand. Donating body parts to science is admirable; but, not to donate them so that a new life can be created just to be killed. It is not the same.

By the way, just because I don't post as often doesn't mean that I have stopped reading the news or having an opinion. I just don't have the time to post everyday, I will only post when I see something that deserves being discussed.

Sorry the last post was so short

I am finding less and less time to post. There is however no shortage of things going on. Keep your eyes on the news and watch as nothing gets fixed. Have a great week.